[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Wouldn't cached mode provide relief if this was the cause?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Milosavljevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Wouldn't cached mode provide relief if this was the cause?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Milosavljevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance
-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Wouldn't cached mode provide relief if this was the cause?
-Original Message-
From: Mark
For this type of benchmarking and troubleshooting; you should be
running the Exchange Troubleshooting Assistant tool, and the
Exchange Best Practices Analyzer.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Mark Milosavljevic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Performance on our Exchange 2003 box has deteriorated and
25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2008 5:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Good morning Mark:
I don't think you have missed anything. Trying to run 500 users
on a 3 drive RAID 5 array (which means you're
Wouldn't cached mode provide relief if this was the cause?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Milosavljevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Hi John,
No full text indexing
suspect that a
replacement server with much better disk array performance will be
required.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2008 7:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
-Original Message-
From: Mark Milosavljevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Are there any guidelines I should be using in sizing server for 500
mailboxes /100 gig total stores
Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Sounds to me like your I/O subsystem is slammed and needs to be
upgraded.
(Slammed is a technical term.) :-)
The 1221 event log entries that should be spit out when online
maintenance
finishes - how much free space do you have in your database
://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Milosavljevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
The raid 5 is composed of 3 disks each 73.4GB Ultra 320 10K rpm
]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2008 7:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Stores are not large - 100 gig in total (raid array has 144 gig
available for stores). Disk layout is operating system raid 1, stores
raid 5 and logs single disk.
I would look
In addition to the stuff Michael has said, there are some client side
considerations.
http://www.blkmtn.org/outlook-settings-and-considerations
I think your bigger problem is elsewhere, but if you had a sudden
uptake of Google Desktop Search, people leaving thousands of items in
their inbox and
]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2008 4:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
I'm taking a shot in the dark here, but as long as CPU and memory are
not being overly taxed, the user can get away with expanding his storage
into an external array. Either a 7
Stores are not large - 100 gig in total (raid array has 144 gig
available for stores). Disk layout is operating system raid 1, stores
raid 5 and logs single disk.
I would look at migrating the stores to RAID 10. RAID 5 isn't so great
when there's a lot of writes going on and is better suited
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
How often is online maintenance completing?
How many disks are in the RAID5 storage array? What speed?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2008 4:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
I'm taking a shot in the dark here, but as long as CPU and memory are
not being overly taxed, the user can get away with expanding his storage
into an external array. Either a 7
:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
Stores are not large - 100 gig in total (raid array has 144 gig
available for stores). Disk layout is operating system raid 1, stores
raid 5 and logs single disk.
On-line maintenance takes about 24 hours. Server
B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2008 10:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
An average disk queue length of 10 is abysmal.
Running a defrag will not help and may very well hurt.
How large are your stores? What
I'm seeing our backlog working off now. I expect we'll have a
conversation with our rep soon.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
I just try
, 2008 6:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
An average disk queue length of 10 is abysmal.
Running a defrag will not help and may very well hurt.
How large are your stores? What is the hardware of the disks? How often
is online maintenance completing
An average disk queue length of 10 is abysmal.
Running a defrag will not help and may very well hurt.
How large are your stores? What is the hardware of the disks? How often is
online maintenance completing?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
21 matches
Mail list logo
