I'm curious if any of you with Exchange 2003 that use recipient
filtering also use the SMTP tar pit feature. If so, can you give
comments on its effect on mail flow/performance if any?
Thanks in advance for any advice/comments.
Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
A hea
Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Tar Pitting
I'm curious if any of you with Exchange 2003 that use recipient filtering
also use the SMTP tar pit feature. If so, can you give comments on its
effect on mai
Thanks, Carl. I had thought that it wouldn't affect performance but
there was a statement in a MS article that said tar pitting may delay
the delivery of legitimate mail.
I appreciate the reply!
Bill Lambert
Concuity
847-941-9206
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
recipients included in this message, the delay would not be significant.
Carl
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
Thanks, Carl. I had thought that it wouldn't affect performance but ther
So, the tar pitting component does not remember from one message to the
next - even in the same connection?
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
The only
]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
So, the tar pitting component does not remember from one message to the next
- even in the same connection?
_
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:05
Got it - it's not IP based but single message based - if that makes
sense.
thanks
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
What is there to rem
//domainsforexchange.net/>
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2008 21:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
Got it - it's not IP based but single message based - if that makes sense.
thanks
From: Carl Housema
CTED]
Sent: 05 June 2008 21:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
Got it - it's not IP based but single message based - if that makes sense.
thanks
_
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin I
.aspx?kbid=842851
Simon.
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2008 00:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
I'm afraid that Carl is 100% correct for Exchange 2003, the version used by the
OP. Perhaps a change w
ccepted and all recipients are valid
are not delayed by tarpitting."
Carl
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting
It is all recipients - because it slows down any response that generates
5.
;
> Carl
>
>
>
> *From:* Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:17 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Tar Pitting
>
>
>
> It is all recipients - because it slows down any response that generates
> 5
Pardon my asking, but why would you want to enable/use tar pitting?
What does it do other than slow down an SMTP conversation?
John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 -
Iridium - 717.633.3823
Roshain - 079 - 736
>Pardon my asking, but why would you want to enable/use tar pitting?
>What does it do other than slow down an SMTP conversation?
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Windows-based-SMTP-Tar-Pitting-Explained.html
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Imag
14 matches
Mail list logo
