Stupid Question

2001-08-15 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Specs: 2 Exchange ORGS(Exchange 5.5 SP4), exist on the same WAN, different subnets. NOS = WINDOWS 2000 AS(SP2) - We are on a 2000 Domain(forest) Both Exchange servers exist in the same Forest   Scenario: We wish to be able to fully share emails, GAL, directory, etc.. as if it was part of

stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread PRamatowski
Especially since backscatter was mentioned here not long ago:( What their admin said: Jon found that the IP address her email is coming from (199.193.13.250) is blacklisted at backscatterer.org. Microsoft has picked up that blacklist and won't allow it into our system. Does MS/forefront use ba

RE: Stupid Question

2001-08-15 Thread John Matteson
Simple answer to stupid question.. Different ORGs are not able to share anything. You can put up the InterOrg Directory Replicatior and get CR's in the directory for the opposite org, but that's really not "sharing".   I think, in theory, you could move the orgs to E2k,

RE: stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread Kennedy, Jim
: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: stupid question Especially since backscatter was mentioned here not long ago:( What their admin said: Jon found that the IP address her email is coming from (199.193.13.250) is blacklisted at backscatterer.org. Microsoft has picked up that blacklist and won&#

RE: stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread PRamatowski
t I know bs.org wasn't in our environment by default. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: stupid question I would be shocked if MS has backscatterer.org automatically built into their spam fi

RE: stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread Kennedy, Jim
-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: stupid question We're the ones that are being listed. Their admin says their exchange server is blocking us because MS is using backscatterer. I found nothing that says MS uses it[1] but figured I'd ask before sticking my foot all the way in when I re

RE: stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
I'm having to restore a computer backup from 2001 to get that data!! Damn, it's been a long time since I ran that website. ~Me From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: stupid question Ok

RE: stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread Michael B. Smith
Smith Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:07 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: RE: stupid question I'm having to restore a computer backup from 2001 to get that data!! Damn, = it's been a long time since I ran that website. ~Me From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@ely

RE: stupid question

2011-07-21 Thread PRamatowski
ed the listing is fixed, otherwise you are at risk to get listed again if new abuse becomes known -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: stupid question Replied to wrong

Outbound SMTP queue stupid question

2008-11-04 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Firstly, thanks for suggestions on DNS host providers that can handle SPF for my home Exch2K3 server. I ended up going with editdns... easy and free. Now, after having made the change, I'm tuning a few things on my spam filter and have noticed outbound msgs in my SMTP queues for users/domains I

RE: Stupid question on update rollups

2013-01-25 Thread Shanks, Brandon C
Correct. Brandon From: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife [joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stupid question on update rollups The latest rollup has the updates from all past rollups as well, correct

RE: Stupid question on update rollups

2013-01-25 Thread Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
To: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Stupid question on update rollups Correct. Brandon From: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife [joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stupid q