Re: [exim] desire for free case

2007-08-08 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 21:42 -0700, Robert Van Horn wrote: Hi, I have users that would prefer to ignore case in their email addresses. tiffany would like to be able to receive email as Tiffany, or tiFfany for that matter. The section in the documentation about case of local parts doesn't seem

Re: [exim] Serious Problems .. over 100,000 messages in the queue

2007-08-08 Thread Andrew Rosolino
I added a RBL and it seriously blocked almost every single e-mail going out and no one go their e-mail. I tried using these Reject mail at SMTP time if the sender host is in the zen.spamhaus.org, or bl.spamcop.net rbl For some reason I had it set to accept for all users and just forward it.. i

Re: [exim] What would you tell the CIO in an ABCs of Email overview?

2007-08-08 Thread Angel Marin
Esther Schindler escribió: Comments and corrections are welcome, particularly if they also include praise. :-) ABC: An Introduction to E-mail Management Helping nontechnical managers calibrate expectations, learn the key issues in e-mail management and identify issues in setting

[exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Mike Brudenell
Greetings - I've just realised I have a problem with a couple of new mail servers I'm bringing into service very shortly. These are being added to our existing cluster of servers. Whilst the new machines can deliver mail for any user whose mailbox is stored on them they can't deliver

Re: [exim] Serious Problems .. over 100,000 messages in the queue

2007-08-08 Thread Jeremy Harris
Andrew Rosolino wrote: I added a RBL and it seriously blocked almost every single e-mail going out and no one go their e-mail. I tried using these Reject mail at SMTP time if the sender host is in the zen.spamhaus.org, or bl.spamcop.net rbl Probably you added the dnsbl test in the wrong

[exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Chris Hills
Hi The server is running CentOS 5 with exim-4.63-3.el5 and dovecot-1.0-1.2.rc15.el5. The relevant configuration is as follows:- [routers] localuser: driver = accept check_local_user local_part_suffix = +* local_part_suffix_optional # transport = local_delivery transport =

Re: [exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:58 +0100, Chris Hills wrote: [routers] localuser: driver = accept check_local_user See http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch15.html for the details of check_local_user. When it runs it tries to set $home, which is where yours is falling

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Mike Brudenell
Greetings - I've made a little progress, but am still having problems. Please can someone give me any advice: my deadline is really close now! On 8 Aug 2007, at 09:26, Mike Brudenell wrote: Obviously this is a case for manual_route, but... How do I detect whether: * the message arrived

Re: [exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:15 +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch15.html for the details of check_local_user. When it runs it tries to set $home, which is where yours is falling down. You probably need to define $home yourself in the router

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:23 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote: So my first two routers now read: # This router sends all locally originating messages to a central smart host. send_local_origin_to_smart_host: driver = manualroute

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Mike Brudenell
GGGHHH! On 8 Aug 2007, at 11:42, Graeme Fowler wrote: Can you change the logic in your first router to: send_local_origin_to_smart_host: driver = manualroute route_list = * mta.york.ac.uk condition = ${if eq{$sender_host_address}{}{yes}{no}} transport = remote_smtp

[exim] Mailbox is full in delivery failure notifications and Exim 4.67: still not working?

2007-08-08 Thread Mike Brudenell
Greetings - Back in April someone asked whether it was possible to get a Mailbox is full informative text included in delivery failure notifications when system quotas were in use, as it does when Exim-imposed quotas are used. Philip replied that there had been a problem with

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Philip Hazel
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Mike Brudenell wrote: I'm *sure* I remember Philip mentioning how to test whether a message arrived over SMTP or not during the course, but I currently I can't locate the information. Test $received_protocol if you really mean exactly what you say above. If you

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Philip Hazel
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Mike Brudenell wrote: When a message can't be delivered because the recipient's mailbox is full an entry gets added to the hints database. When a subsequent message arrives delivery is attempted and, when it fails, Exim appears to consult the hints database and then

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Mike Brudenell
Greetings - On 8 Aug 2007, at 12:19, Philip Hazel wrote: When a message can't be delivered because the recipient's mailbox is full an entry gets added to the hints database. When a subsequent message arrives delivery is attempted and, when it fails, Exim appears to consult the hints

Re: [exim] DomainKey signing based on Envelope or From Header

2007-08-08 Thread Tom Kistner
Erik Schorr wrote: It's very odd that we can set the selector to use for signing, but not override the domain reported in the domainkey-signature header. Is there a workaround for this? Perhaps a feature being worked on? Am I on crack and just trying to break a rule in the DK spec? You

Re: [exim] desire for free case

2007-08-08 Thread Michael Sprague
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:42:19PM -0700, Robert Van Horn wrote: Hi, I have users that would prefer to ignore case in their email addresses. tiffany would like to be able to receive email as Tiffany, or tiFfany for that matter. The section in the documentation about case of local parts

Re: [exim] Special routing for incoming non-SMTP mail: help needed urgently

2007-08-08 Thread Philip Hazel
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Mike Brudenell wrote: 1. Send Message 1 to an address on the test server. Delivery is attempted. Message gets deferred. Queue runs within the 5 minute maximum retry period attempt delivery and defer the message again. A queue run after the 5

Re: [exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Chris Hills
Graeme Fowler wrote: Actually, that won't work either if you end up with $home trying to be a nonexistent directory, because your error is coming inside the pipe transport you're using for delivery. You need to do one of: - remove check_local_user from the transport, or - set $home to

Re: [exim] desire for free case

2007-08-08 Thread Michael Sprague
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:45:28AM -0400, Michael Sprague wrote: On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:42:19PM -0700, Robert Van Horn wrote: Hi, I have users that would prefer to ignore case in their email addresses. tiffany would like to be able to receive email as Tiffany, or tiFfany for that

Re: [exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Chris Hills
For now I have changed the router as follows and this seems to work ok:- localuser: driver = accept check_local_user local_part_suffix = +* local_part_suffix_optional transport = dovecot_delivery transport_home_directory = /tmp cannot_route_message = Unknown user # stat

Re: [exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Nigel Wade
Graeme Fowler wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:15 +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch15.html for the details of check_local_user. When it runs it tries to set $home, which is where yours is falling down. You probably need to define $home

Re: [exim] Message delivery when home directory does not exist

2007-08-08 Thread Chris Hills
Nigel Wade wrote: As part of the user registration I send a welcome message, and delivery of this message creates the initial home and Maildir directories. Without this the POP/IMAP daemon throws a wobbly due to the missing home directory. On a side note, our current production email

[exim] String expansion

2007-08-08 Thread Marcin Krol
Hello everyone, Following string expansion works: ${if eq{${lookup{da7.promo.pl}lsearch*{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}}{} {remote}{local}} local ${if eq{${lookup{not.local.domain}lsearch*{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}}{} {remote}{local}} remote However, I need to actually

Re: [exim] String expansion

2007-08-08 Thread Marc Sherman
Marcin Krol wrote: Hello everyone, Following string expansion works: ${if eq{${lookup{da7.promo.pl}lsearch*{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}}{} {remote}{local}} local ${if eq{${lookup{not.local.domain}lsearch*{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}}{} {remote}{local}} remote

[exim] moving spam to a different folder

2007-08-08 Thread alexis
Hello all, is there any way to move spam marked messages (reading the spam headers) to a different folder than new inside the user maildir? Fact is, some users still use dialup and other users use gprs/edge to read their emails. First group has the speed problem. Second group is charged by the

Re: [exim] moving spam to a different folder

2007-08-08 Thread John Robinson
On 09/08/2007 00:56, alexis wrote: So what i want to to is to move out the marked spam to a different folder reachable by imap and leave the inbox that read's the pop3 clients with the non marked email. Any help? Certainly possible. I score spam in the data ACL, from which I end up with