Re: [exim] Completely lost

Hi guys Thanks for the responses I will be having a go at this later today and will report back my success or lack of it On 14/08/2012 07:46, "Klaus Ethgen" wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA512 > >Hi Hill, > >Am Mo den 13. Aug 2012 um 18:3

Re: [exim] Completely lost

# ### end acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt # From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Monday, 13 August 2012 16:43 To: Hill Ruyter Subject: Re: [exim] Completely lost Hi Hill, Your particular type of filtering

[exim] Completely lost

Hi guys I have been using exim4 for many years and there are some things that I have never managed to get my head around I am coming for help and I know many will say I should read the docs but that is part of the problem. I don't understand! I am running Exim on an Ubuntu server which I know d

Re: [exim] Gmail's new 'suspicious sender' flag

Reading your email the following occurred to me. I have a very old email address that I have not used actively for a number of years. You would think the only thing in there would be spam but surprisingly enough there are emails from legitimate services I also no longer use, like for example a v

Re: [exim] Gmail's new 'suspicious sender' flag

Sent from my iPad On 10 Jul 2011, at 19:55, Jeff Lasman wrote: > On Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:30:09 am WJCarpenter wrote: > >> (I pay no attention to either of these cases except for occasionally >> looking at the logs out of curiosity. They're both relatively small >> compared to various oth

Re: [exim] Problem with TLS connection

everyone for their help though in getting me up and running again Yours Hill From: W B Hacker Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:29:48 + To: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] Problem with TLS connection Hill Ruyter wrote: > Hello again > > Whenever I make a change to the config

Re: [exim] Problem with TLS connection

should be using to make SMTP connections over TLS Regards Hill From: Heiko Schlittermann Organization: schlittermann -- internet & unix support Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:14:12 +0200 To: "" Subject: Re: [exim] Problem with TLS connection Hill Ruyter (Thu May 19 11:30:40 2

Re: [exim] Problem with TLS connection

Thank you Heiko I think I understand You have correctly surmised that I had 587 in the TLS_on_connect_ports list I had incorrectly thought that I needed to put the port number I was wishing to use for TLS connections in this list. I have changed the configuration to just include 465 in that l

Re: [exim] Problem with TLS connection

Hello Heiko And the list too this time >[Your mail was not directed to the list, I'm not sure, what's your >intention. I'm replying in private mail therefore. ] I had not realised I was not replying to the list Hill Ruyter (Wed May 18 16:29:30 2011): > Hi >

[exim] Problem with TLS connection

Hi all I am having a problem with my exim since a recent power outage and I don¹t know what has changed I am getting the following error on TLS connections from my client. If I turn off SSL at the client end I can send mail but that is not ideal Any help as to what I should be checking much

Re: [exim] matching envelope from and from

009-06-05 at 15:56 +0100, Hill Ruyter wrote: > > I basically want to say > > if envelope-from is not equal to from and from is equal to me then > drop > > You'll stop receiving mailing list messages, then... look at the Exim > list mails: > > Return-path: > F

[exim] matching envelope from and from

I am getting a lot of mail recently that is passing my HELO tests and callouts but it has clear fakery that I could test for if I knew how the envelope from and from address are not the same in fact the from address is pretending to be me I basically want to say if envelope-from is no

Re: [exim] Debian and Exim

I run Exim on Debian I must admit I was unaware of the Debian list so have normally asked questions here I don't believe I have mentioned before I run Debian so have not been sent to the other list I do, however, run the monolithic config rather than split not that it would make much differenc

Re: [exim] acl black art help wanted

> -Original Message- > From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] > On Behalf Of Ian Eiloart > Sent: 18 May 2009 10:51 > To: W B Hacker; exim users > Subject: Re: [exim] acl black art help wanted > > > > --On 17 May 2009 13:40:46 +0800 W B Hacker wrote: >

Re: [exim] acl black art help wanted

. Thanks again for your time (especially since it was a weekend) Hill -Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of W B Hacker Sent: 17 May 2009 06:41 To: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] acl black art help wanted Hill Ruyter wrote: >

Re: [exim] acl black art help wanted

- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Hill Ruyter Sent: 17 May 2009 00:48 To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: [exim] acl black art help wanted Hi I am really struggling with acl config in my exim I have tried to read the documentation but find

[exim] acl black art help wanted

Hi I am really struggling with acl config in my exim I have tried to read the documentation but find it quite confusing I also downloaded the ols lists mentioned here, there was one for helo checking that looked interesting I got really confused when the ols acl comments sai

Re: [exim] Blocked because of a name

Thanks I had not thought of that Is that a common search string for that word Just to clarify it was not my server blocking rather a user on my server that was being blocked by someone she regularly sends mail to. Interesting though that if v*ra was being searched for would vera.surname n

[exim] Blocked because of a name

Hi While we are all talking about blocked emails etc. I thought I would post this curiosity I discovered a little while ago Perhaps someone can shed some light . A relative of mine is called Vera and I gave her an account on my email server Her emails were getting blocked by some reci

Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses

esses On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:15:44 +0100 "Hill Ruyter" Wrote: >>snip snip<< > I run my own email server at home on an Ubuntu box > I have done many things to adhere to commonly accepted standards I have > a static IP > My ISP has set my PTR for me This is all that

Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses

Behalf Of W B Hacker Sent: 15 May 2009 16:29 To: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Richard Salts wrote: >> >> *trimmed* >>> For instance using the BATV domain variant I'd send out emails with

Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses

--On 15 May 2009 13:11:02 +0100 Hill Ruyter wrote: >> >> What I seem to see here is an assumption that the only people who should >> be allowed to run an email server are those doing it as a business and if >> you want to run a little linux box with a couple of domains

Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses

>Richard Salts wrote: > >*trimmed* >> >> For instance using the BATV domain variant I'd send out emails with a signed >> envelope such as localp...@prvs-tag.example.com. My trick dns server would >> then only publish the record for a specific TAG as a subdomain with a time to >> die of 2 days o

Re: [exim] Blocked mails

ginal Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Hill Ruyter Sent: 14 May 2009 15:19 To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Blocked mails Hi Thanks for your assistance so far I was unsure about posting the domain names but here they are

Re: [exim] Blocked mails

2009 14:29 To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Blocked mails On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 14:03 +0100, Hill Ruyter wrote: > Is there anything I can do to fix this problem? Firstly you could not mask the domain names in your post, but anyway: contact Hotmail. It's the only option you hav

[exim] Blocked mails

Hi I have been away for some time and I really should do some house keeping on the server. The first issue I need to resolve has me stumped, mostly because I am stupid so I am hoping for some useful pointers. I have tried the documentation but I am probably lookin in the wrong place.

Re: [exim] missing authentication

Hi all not sure if this helps but this is what I use on a passwd like file it is identical to passwd just in a different place so that users do not have system accounts Kind regards Hill server_condition = "${if crypteq{$3}{${extract{1}{:}{${lookup{$2}lsearch{/other/directory/etc/passwd}{$va

Re: [exim] REPOST: Possible TLS weakness in Exim? (to be noticed with Opera and Exim 4.50 from Debian stable)

gh a processing overhead. Kind regards Hill Ruyter - Original Message - From: "Philip Hazel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; "Florian Weimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:48 PM Su

Re: [exim] SORBS

ers list can't fix it for me (I'll get back in my cave now) Regards Hill Ruyter - Original Message - From: "W B Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 4:17 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Hill Ruyter wrote: &g

Re: [exim] SORBS

my SORBS issue now but just in case would you let me know anything interesting from your logs Many thanks in advance and sorry again to the other list members Kind regards Hill Ruyter -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org

Re: [exim] exim loggin

users of this requirement and that their contacts will need to put your users' address in their hotmail safe list to ensure delivery. This may be a pain for them but if they want to be sure to have mail delivered to hotmail they will have to get hotmail accounts ;) Hill Ruyter - Ori

Re: [exim] exim loggin

Hi This may be a REALLY stupid suggestion ... But have you checked the junk mail folder in hotmail? Regards Hill - Original Message - From: "Mark Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:27 AM Subject: [exim] exim loggin > Hi, > > I'm new to exim (4.5) and lo

Re: [exim] Not sure how to block this spam ?

Thank you John That was very clear and I now understand much better what is happening I guess I will read up and start some more aggressive spam filtering by switching on more stuff in SA-Exim and you were right it is "envelope to" Thanks again Hill Ruyter - Original Message -

[exim] Not sure how to block this spam ?

Hi I am receiving spam to one of my email domains now that does not have my address in the TO or CC headers which I thought should not work as the server only delivers to addresses that are configured. When I look at the headers there is a field called "envelope for" which contains the addres

Re: [exim] SORBS

Regards Hill - Original Message - From: "W B Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Chris Lear wrote: >> * Chris Lightfoot wrote (10/11/06 11:12): >>> On Thu, Nov 09,

Re: [exim] SORBS

list as I guess you are right it is rather off topic Thanks again for all those who have advised me without condescending to me Kind Regards Hill - Original Message - From: "Marc Sherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [exim

Re: [exim] SORBS

Dominick McGlinchey (the same name as the "most wanted Irish terrorist") would always get questioned and body searched going through Heathrow but he always got on the plane ! Hill Ruyter - Original Message - From: "Ian Eiloart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hill Ruy

Re: [exim] SORBS

would like to have everything nice and clean and tidy so I will be in discussion with my ISP Hill - Original Message - From: "Marc Sherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> H

Re: [exim] SORBS

D]> To: "exim users" Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> That is the thing >> I am a business customer but I am trialling their ADSL2+ service >> this has some limitations i.e. no fixed

Re: [exim] SORBS

Hi That is the thing I am a business customer but I am trialling their ADSL2+ service this has some limitations i.e. no fixed addresses yet but I get the benefit of high bandwidth at 512k prices ;) Hill - Original Message - From: "Tom Kistner" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [exim] *Suspect* Re: SORBS

LD) by mail.ruyter.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1GiG4a-0002yS-Ef; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:00:29 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Hill Ruyter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [exim] SORBS

Hill - Original Message - From: "W B Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:10 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> I would like to garner opinion here >> >> I

Re: [exim] SORBS

- Original Message - From: "W B Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:10 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> I would like to garner opinion here >> >> I have found tha

Re: [exim] SORBS

Hi sorry I meant I am being blocked by someone based on my being listed in SORBS When I check with SORBS it is because I have a dynamic IP The word dynamic appears in the PTR so this is what they have picked up Kind regards Hill - Original Message - From: "Dave Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[exim] SORBS

address block belong to so there is an audit trail I am just stuck with a dynamic address at the moment Any thoughts opinions or causes of action open to me are welcome Kind Regards Hill Ruyter -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http

Re: [exim] Support Vacuum

document... PHEW ! ... That saved me a job ;o) Yours Hill Ruyter -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Support Vacuum

if I change it then update-exim4.conf will break ? Regards Hill - Original Message - From: "Marc Haber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:10 PM Subject: Re: [exim] Support Vacuum > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:18:48 -, "Hill Ruyter" &

Re: [exim] Support Vacuum

write it would anyone here have time/be willing to error check a "noobs guide to exim on Debian" ? Yours Hill > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:18:48 -, "Hill Ruyter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>However as a newbie it is not always obvious what information ca

Re: [exim] Support Vacuum

Ok So I am about as green as they come ... > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:09:05PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> >> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:38:23 +0100, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >It should be noted that exim4 on debian supports the one large conf >> >file. If you put any valid exim

Re: [exim] SSL Anomoly? or config error?

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SSL Anomoly? or config error? > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Tim Wilde wrote: > >> From: Tim Wilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Hill Ruyter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: exim-users@exim.org

Re: [exim] SSL Anomoly? or config error?

AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hill Ruyter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SSL Anomoly? or config error? > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have a strange situation with regards to SSL on my server >> >

[exim] SSL Anomoly? or config error?

Hi I have a strange situation with regards to SSL on my server It is probably a configuration issue but I cannot see where If I send e-mail (using outlook express) from a machine on the same subnet as the server I get an error telling me that SSL is not supported and I have had to configure t

Re: [exim] remove my address

Hi does this mean I am not welcome any more? no problem you can remove my address Hill - Original Message - From: "Martin Sellner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hill Ruyter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 9:52 PM Subject: remo

Re: [exim] Really Cool Trick

Hi Can ask a quick question on this When I create a new user on my server (the e-mail users do not have local accounts) I put the username in file named after the domain in a directory called virtuals the exim router does a check against the local parts and if the user exists in the file unde

Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive

statistics are published for comment. Otherwise I see this argument going round in circles until we all figure out that so much time has passed something not yet thought of has completely replaced SMTP Yours Hill Ruyter - Original Message - From: "Andrew - Supernews" <[EM

Re: [exim] re [TLS Problem]

Thanks Marc I will try the ubuntu forum Regards Hill - Original Message - From: "Marc Sherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [exim] re [TLS Problem] > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> I think I unde

Re: [exim] re [TLS Problem]

ct ? Many thanks in advance Hill Ruyter - Original Message - From: "W B Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [exim] re [TLS Problem] > Philip Hazel wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Hil

Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive

This all sounds remarkably familiar ... These UCEPROTECT people don't happen to be in Australia outfit run by a megalomaniac who's name I forget (sorry) We had an argument when I worked at a tier 1 network. He blocked a whole /19 address range because he couldn't use RIPE and refused to back

Re: [exim] re [TLS Problem]

d Is this more likely a problem in another part of the system or is it exim ? Regards Hill - Original Message - From: "Hill Ruyter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:07 PM Subject: [exim] re [TLS Problem] > Hi all > > Well my TLS proble

[exim] re [TLS Problem]

exim (I use invoke-rc.d exim4 ) I find that there is still a process running for exim after I have stopped it I never had this problem before the upgrade I can manage round it by manually killing the process but wondered if anyone could shed some light Kind regards Hill Ruyter -- ## List details

[exim] TLS problem

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "exim users" Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: Re: [exim] TLS problem > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> Well I upgraded my Ubuntu last night and although I saved and re-used my >> original exim4 config >&

[exim] TLS problem

Hi Well I upgraded my Ubuntu last night and although I saved and re-used my original exim4 config I now seem to have broken TLS, My client returns a message to say ... "The server does not support a SSL connection. Account: 'my.domain', Server: 'my.domain', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '2

[exim] Spam error

will give garbage when decoding entities at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182." I would like to understand what this means, is it a big problem and how do I correct it ? any pointers as to who I can ask would be much appreciated Kind Regards Hill Ruyter -- ## List detai

Re: [exim] Trouble with a match condition

really nice if there was a simplified explanation with some common examples (and mistakes) for the use of regular expressions within the exim documentation rather than just a link to the PCRE docs. Or perhaps there is and I was too dumb to spot it ? Yours Hill Ruyter - Original Message -

Re: [exim] Trouble with a match condition

06, 2006 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [exim] Trouble with a match condition > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> >> I am having a spot of bother getting a match condition to work in an exim >> router >> here is the router in it's entirity including the match condition. >> The condit

Re: [exim] Trouble with a match condition

Hi That has done the trick thanks very much for the correction Kind regards Hill Ruyter - Original Message - From: "Marc Sherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [exim] Trouble with a match condition > Hill Ruyter wrote:

[exim] Trouble with a match condition

r/950_exim-config_virtual_user_spam ### Kind Regards Hill Ruyter -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/