On 30/12/2020 13:10, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
You must be a wise man Evgeniy! On the exim host, I set sysctl
net.inet.tcp.fastopen.client_enable=0 and the problem seemed to go away.
That's good to know; thanks.
It may be worth raising a bug against FreeBSD.
Now if you care :-)
On 30/12/2020 08:04, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 02:25:19PM +0700, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
Is this ktrace informative https://termbin.com/zjsv ?
Yes; thanks.
8889 exim CALL socket(PF_INET,0x1,IPPROTO_IP)
8889 exim RET socket
On 29/12/2020 16:11, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
Strange, then why does authentication work fine with correct data? It's only the incorrect data (decided by a separate server which is contacted by my PAM module) that causes a temporary error code in Exim
Ah. I didn't understand that
On 29/12/2020 11:03, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:20:51AM +0700, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
You can see from it that exim's host opens a TCP connection to the
clamav host, the clamav host replies with SYN+ACK,
On 29/12/2020 00:05, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
I see a lot of lines like this in the mainlog:
2020-12-27 20:04:00 login authenticator failed for (USER) [199.192.16.253]: 435
Unable to authenticate at present (set_id=scan...@mydomain.de): Permission
denied
So it returns the
On 28/12/2020 17:10, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
I=[nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn]*
Is it just for the I field (local interface used) or also for the shown remote
IP address? The quoted text doesn't mention the local interface at all.
If you're not logging the local IP, it'll be on the remote IP.
On 28/12/2020 16:23, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
When two or more messages are delivered down a single SMTP connection, an
asterisk follows the IP address in the log lines for the second and subsequent
messages.
How does that look like in the log file?
I=[nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn]*
2. I
On 25/12/2020 13:01, Sagar Acharya via Exim-users wrote:
The central problem is however, that dig gives me the correct MX record and
nslookup doesn't. MX record exists, just exim is not able to find it.
I even tried this email id. It gives these prompts
...
dnslookup router called for
On 24/12/2020 23:30, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
Well, if that log was intended for humans, would it be an interesting idea to write a machine-readable log as well?
See bugs 2142 and 2610. So far, not enough actual interest to
get anyone to put the effort into the developement and
On 24/12/2020 22:17, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
I'm parsing Exim log files, specifically the mainlog. Man, that's a complex
structure and it's hard to find all necessary details from the documentation
and by reading my actual log files. I'm using several regular expressions for
On 23/12/2020 22:05, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 21/12/2020 12:50, Bart Noordervliet via Exim-users wrote:
Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: expand_getlistele 1309
The fix will be available in the next few days.
Commit 942f0be6c2.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details
On 21/12/2020 12:50, Bart Noordervliet via Exim-users wrote:
Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: expand_getlistele 1309
That's a bug; spotted by an internal selfcheck.
Well found! I thought we'd cleared most of those.
The fix will be available in the next few days. If you
can build from
On 23/12/2020 19:25, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
So I had another idea. If queuing and bouncing is the problem, can I get rid of that?
Slight terminology diversion... "store-and-forward" is a better description
of the cause of your problem. Exim generally tries to deliver forwarded
On 16/12/2020 16:49, Frank Richter via Exim-users wrote:
On 12/12/2020 15:30, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 12/12/2020 14:46, Frank Richter via Exim-users wrote:
It comes from an e-mail with an overlong From: header:
From: "…"
I'd like to reject such "address m
On 15/12/2020 18:13, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
On 2020-12-15 Kirill Sluchanko via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
Subject:
=?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtFWFRFUk5BTF0gUmU6IFJlOiBSZTog0JzQsNGA0YjRgNGD0YLQuNC30LDRhtC4?=
Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÑ
[...]
echo
On 14/12/2020 11:51, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
If its the sender address, i.e. the envelope then in acl_check_mail something
like:
He said "header".
should do it, otherwise if you want to test the 'From' header in the body do
something like:
deny condition = ${if >
On 12/12/2020 14:46, Frank Richter via Exim-users wrote:
It comes from an e-mail with an overlong From: header:
From: "…"
I'd like to reject such "address monsters". How's the best way to achieve this?
Try a rewrite rule:
^.{40,}@tuced.eu deny...@tuced.de
before your existing
On 12/12/2020 13:11, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
I was wondering, do modern smtp/imap/pop connections support compression ?
I've never seen it being offered for SMTP (but I've not been looking
specifically for it). It was suggested in 2016:
On 04/12/2020 17:40, Charlie Elgholm via Exim-users wrote:
Any way to get the autoreply transport to sign with DKIM?
The autoreply transport generates a message and submits it
for further processing - routing and transport, per your
entire configuration.
An smtp transport, as called by your
On 04/12/2020 11:55, Andreas via Exim-users wrote:
Every hint is really welcome.
When all else fails: packet capture.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
On 02/12/2020 11:03, Adam Major via Exim-users wrote:
Will check your fix/optimisations on test server.
I see I missed off a Megabytes "M" on the quota, and the default
handling for it. You'll need to do those bits.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 29/11/2020 15:07, Adam Major via Exim-users wrote:
mysql_localuser:
driver = accept
# This gives you $domain_data
domains = +local_domains
condition = ${if eq{}{${lookup mysql {SELECT mail_user FROM mail_box WHERE
\
mail_domain='${quote_mysql:$domain}' AND
On 26/11/2020 09:06, Gedalya via Exim-users wrote:
When user1 sends a message to user2 and user3, and user3 also gets generated
*twice* by a redirect router, user3 ends up getting the message twice.
bcc:
debug_print = "R: bcc for $local_part@$domain"
driver = redirect
data =
On 28/11/2020 17:24, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
All roght how can I do this without usingtls_sni or tls_in_sli ?
Insufficient information.
In what situation do you want to use what?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
dovecot:
debug_print = "R: dovecot for $local_part@$domain"
driver = accept
domains = +local_domains
transport = dovecot_virtual_delivery
cannot_route_message = Unknown user
The problem I am experiencing is that a test against _any_ address,
existent or not,
On 18/11/2020 15:25, James Strother via Exim-users wrote:
Can you suggest
owners/permissions for the key?
Mine are root:exim 640
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with
On 23/11/2020 14:20, Gary Stainburn via Exim-users wrote:
data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases.d/$domain}}
Don't use a tainted name as the filename for that lsearch.
Assuming that not doing the lsearch when the file doesn't exist
is what you want: use a dsearch in that
On 22/11/2020 13:30, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
2020-11-22 15:37:25.691 Exim configuration error in line 3 of
/etc/exim4/exim4-ldap-config.conf:
option setting expected:debug_print = "R: user_ad_aliases for
$local_part@$domain"
If I comment out the mentioned line, the
On 20/11/2020 06:05, Dan Egli via Exim-users wrote:
I was hoping someone here could point me in the right direction. I am setting
up an Active Directory domain using Samba, and I wanted to have exim check for
mailboxes and passwords against samba's LDAP database. The idea is to
synchronize
On 11/11/2020 16:29, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users wrote:
On 2020-11-11 13:16, Jeremy Harris wrote:
Semi-radical: provide an ACL, router, and transport modifier that
checks some variable or content for dangerous contents
We have that. All data provided by an untrusted source, described
On 10/11/2020 19:45, Chris Siebenmann via Exim-users wrote:
Moderate: there should be a full chapter in the Exim documentation on
tainting and how to deal with it. This should cover the security risks
that it's there to deal with, common configuration snippets that are now
a problem, and how
On 10/11/2020 20:45, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
I think as I said, provide a untaint tool, that allows custom data to verify
against.
Like:
${untaint(${var},
"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789")}
No; this is a bad idea.
It is far to easy for someone
On 10/11/2020 09:33, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
I am all for improved security but a single "step change" that breaks
existing configurations is IMHO going too far.
taint_mode = off | warn | enforce
Warn and enforce, I could see as an interim measure.
But only interim - to be
On 08/11/2020 22:15, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
If the documentation stated that somehow, it would ease migrations.
Suggestions for (wording and where to put it) welcome.
The generic discussion how a router works sounds like a good place
to me for giving a hint on the intended
On 10/11/2020 06:44, Kai Bojens via Exim-users wrote:
The only problem I have with tainting is the lack of documentation. Why
is there no single page with just "Hey, external data is now considered
tainted.
To help the discussion along I've put up a copy of the current
(git HEAD)
On 09/11/2020 22:27, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
We're open for suggestions.
The one major hole I know of is for the creation of a
mailbox file, first time, for an account.
To that end I'm intending an enhancement of the "create_file"
option on the appendfile transport. The
On 08/11/2020 14:47, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
In the old days, that was the standard way of matching. Then conditions
were added, many people switched to them, and now we go back to the old
domains/local_parts way, because that sets the *_data variables.
If the documentation stated
On 07/11/2020 23:30, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
Previously, a single lookup that checked both local part and domain to
let the router match was popular. Now that's fighting against the design.
Use two lookups, one for local_parts and one for domains, even if both
perform the same
On 07/11/2020 22:45, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
Basically 'tainted as default' unless you turn it back off ...?
Sigh. You should preferably actually check that the
values exist in your database.
Yes, you can game it. Don't be so stupid.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 07/11/2020 20:43, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
What do I need to know to fix this one?
Either
- read back through exim-users, which has amply covered tainting
or
- start by hauling up the concept index in the docs, and search on
the string "taint. Then , if that doesn't answer your
On 07/11/2020 17:41, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
Does Sophie still work? Is it still supported??
If you're asking about the interface from Exim, it's still in
the sourcebase. Whether it's included in the binary depends
on the builder, which is apparently you.
Whether the thing that
On 07/11/2020 16:16, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
Sophos manual for savscan says it returns:
0 If no errors are encountered and no threats are detected.
1 If you interrupt savscan (usually by pressing CRTL+C) or
kill the process.
2 If some error
On 06/11/2020 18:00, Chris Siebenmann via Exim-users wrote:
One thing to be aware of when writing DKIM related rules is that
it's quite possible (and in some environments routine) for legitimate
incoming email to have multiple DKIM signatures, some of which fail to
validate and some of which
On 06/11/2020 14:02, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
For now, I'd like to accept anything - just have the Data about whether
an incoming email was compliant or not - with the option of then moving
to become more strict.
So, just replace your deny & defer with accept, and add into each
(and
On 06/11/2020 11:53, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
I've got the following in exim.conf
acl_check_dkim:
...
This is breaking some of my customers...
First define your required policies. We can't really do that
for you. The obvious response is "do not use DKIM" - but I suspect
that
On 04/11/2020 21:45, Rainer Dorsch via Exim-users wrote:
elif "$original_local_part" is "web.de-forward" then save Maildir/.AA-
bokomoko.web-de/
does not match this mail:
Return-Path:
Envelope-to: web.de-forw...@bokomoko.de
On possibility is that you have configured a local_part_suffix
On 04/11/2020 14:15, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
OTOH it would be good to have the +dovecot_domains compiled automatically
from all the domains in /etc/dovecot/users instead of defining it as a
semi-static list.
(I call it semi-static because it's defined as
"domainlist dovecot_domains
On 29/10/2020 12:06, Wolfgang Breyha via Exim-users wrote:
On 29/10/2020 12:45, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 29/10/2020 11:21, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I got a message from a user that our exim apparently sends a wrong
status
code on full mailboxes.
Something like
On 29/10/2020 11:21, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I got a message from a user that our exim apparently sends a wrong
status code on full mailboxes.
Something like this:
550 Mailbox is full
550 5.1.1 u...@domain.com… User unknown
That's two separate responses. The client much
On 28/10/2020 07:22, Rainer Dorsch via Exim-users wrote:
elif "$original_local_part:" is "web" or "$original_local_part:" is
"impressum" then save Maildir/.AA-bokomoko.public/
You have an extraneous ":" there.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
OpenPGP_0xBCE58C8CE41F32DF.asc
Description:
On 27/10/2020 13:59, Matt Rubright via Exim-users wrote:
While troubleshooting some user complaints about email queue times, I
discovered some cases where emails are logged as having longer queue times
than they actually do.
The QT log entry shows the total queue time to be 1m24s, but the
On 27/10/2020 05:25, Alex King via Exim-users wrote:
condition = ${if >={$spam_score_int}{400}{1}{0}}
I want this copy to be made if spam_score_int is above the threshold,
but to be skipped if it's lower, or if spam_score_int isn't defined.
$spam_score_int is defined whenever your Exim
On 26/10/2020 11:50, Gregory Edigarov via Exim-users wrote:
So the question is how to correctly connect shadow transport to this
processing in case of 4.94?
So you're doing a major lookup into a MySQL DB, populating
$address_data. You should be able to extend that suitably
to return validated
On 26/10/2020 09:53, Gregory Edigarov via Exim-users wrote:
Having this in config, exim-4.94
local_copy_incoming:
driver = appendfile
directory = /var/vmail/backup/$domain/$local_part/incoming
Most of this info is in the documentation.
You need to deliberately check that those variable
I should caution you that by obscuring the actual message flow,
you will be making diagnosis of problems much harder.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
OpenPGP_0xBCE58C8CE41F32DF.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
## List details at
On 19/10/2020 11:28, Matthias Rieber via Exim-users wrote:
I'm passing mails to spamassassin via a transport like:
I'm wondering if it's possible to NOT add new received header and a new
envelope-to header?
Not while using that way of talking to SA.
You could perhaps switch to a direct call
On 15/10/2020 15:04, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
Routers and transports have the options "user" and "group" (chapters 15
and 24) which allow you to change the user/group that exim runs as
for these actions.
Not quite. They set up the user/group which will be used for the final
On 15/10/2020 16:44, Benoît PELISSIER via Exim-users wrote:
I would like to know if it is possible to put a limit of emails sent per
minute / hour to a particular domain ?
Yes; investigate the "ratelimit" ACL condition.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 14/10/2020 19:25, Jürgen Edner via Exim-users wrote:
localuser_maildir:
driver = accept
check_local_user
debug_print = DEBUG-HOME:$home:
condition = ${if exists{$home/.imapmail/cur}}
transport = local_delivery_maildir
Trace:
25242 > localuser_maildir router <
On 08/10/2020 17:50, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
> Am 08.10.20 um 17:11 schrieb Graeme Fowler via Exim-users:
>> ...but if the client never managed to actually connect to Exim, there is
>> nothing to log.
> In this case, you could see the messages exim sent for the smtp session
> with tcpdump,
On 08/10/2020 15:34, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
> @Devs: Maybe a nice FR to put a "421 client aborted connection from ip
> x.x.x.x." in the logs.
Not sure what the significance of the "@" is, nor what an FR might be...
If it was supposed to be an RFE, bugs.exim.org is the place to record
it.
Could you get a debug run using "-d+timestamp" and with
log_selector = +millisec
in the config?
Also, since you think it's the queue-write, you could add queue_only
so that we don't do the delivery (and get the full debug of that).
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 07/10/2020 15:56, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> I don't know what "tainting" means
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-string_expansions.html
Third paragraph.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 07/10/2020 14:14, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> How can I debug [...] Sieve filter in Exim? I thought that the
Command line "-d" facilities. Depending how you are submitting
a test message, you may need to run your daemon in foreground
mode.
On 04/10/2020 08:30, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
>> On 03/10/2020 15:18, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
>>> And why did they call bool{...} and friends "Expansion conditions"
>>> while they are
On 03/10/2020 15:18, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
> And why did they call bool{...} and friends "Expansion conditions"
> while they are clearly not conditions, but operators?
The operate on things and result in conditionals. Have to call
them something.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List
On 02/10/2020 17:26, Patrick Porteous via Exim-users wrote:
> However, it appears that the $message_body variable doesn't analyze the
> source HTML of the message, but instead just looks at the plain text
> produced by the HTML output. Is Exim capable of analyzing the source
> HTML
No.
On 01/10/2020 12:45, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
> accept condition =
> ${lookup{$local_part@$domain}lsearch{/etc/dovecot/aliases}{yes}}
>
> Doesn't this line mean that the right part of the expression is err... hmm...
> a condition?
No. The ACL general-purpose condition called
On 01/10/2020 10:00, Victor Sudakov via Exim-users wrote:
> And I'm damned if I understand what is "condition name expected."
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-string_expansions.html
Section 7, "Expansion conditions".
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 30/09/2020 15:57, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users wrote:
> What I want to do is to track a particular error (AUTH used when not
> advertised), in a cleaner way than scanning the log. My impression was
> this was just the kind of thing events were meant for. Was I wrong?
Yes and no. Event
On 29/09/2020 16:44, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users wrote:
> Where can I find a list of possible $event_data values for this event?
>
> I realize that the list may not be fixed or guaranteed stable. Just give
> me a starting point.
There's no formal list. It's a string intended to give a hint to
On 28/09/2020 23:47, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> Can I add individual headers to the messages for each recipient?
No, not in ACL. There's still only the one message.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 28/09/2020 20:52, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> I'm trying to get the PRDR extension to work but can't find any
> documentation about its ACL. All I see is the global option
> 'prdr_enable' and the ACL 'acl_smtp_data_prdr'. But I don't know how to
> use it.
It gives you a chance to
On 26/09/2020 06:02, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
> On 2020-09-25 Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
>> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (Fr 25 Sep 2020 14:12:31
>> CEST):
>>> Debian Sid has a 4.94-related looking package version for Exim;
>>> I
On 25/09/2020 15:03, Gary Stainburn via Exim-users wrote:
> If I use the following command it shows the router working as expected,
> and the transport is queued, but never shows the transport doing anything.
>
> exim -f g...@ringways.co.uk -d+all -bt nore...@ringways.co.uk 2>&1|gvim -
Doh, I
On 25/09/2020 15:03, Gary Stainburn via Exim-users wrote:
> If I use the following command it shows the router working as expected,
> and the transport is queued, but never shows the transport doing anything.
>
> exim -f g...@ringways.co.uk -d+all -bt nore...@ringways.co.uk 2>&1|gvim -
and the
On 25/09/2020 12:50, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Isn't that the "cork" issue that was fixed around
> 8f9adfd36222d4e9e730734e00dffe874073e5b4,
> which is not part of 4.92. I do not remember the pre-conditions to
> trigger this bug, I believe, it was related to pipelining, wasn't
On 25/09/2020 10:26, Christian Eyrich via Exim-users wrote:
> I’ve sent mails from @outlook.de to my server but the TLS encrypted
> communication just stops at one point after some progress through EHLO,
> MAIL FROM, RCPT TO (exim -bd -d+all):
>
> 10:04:45 15402 SMTP>> 250 Accepted
> 10:04:45
On 23/09/2020 18:49, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
>> 22 212.227.15.19 → 94.16.119.13 TCP 66 41705 → 25 [FIN, ACK]
>> Seq=20 Ack=228 Win=64128 Len=0 TSval=3976249530 TSecr=307582370
>
> Why is your server setting the FIN flag on that packet?
That's GMX's FIN.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On 23/09/2020 16:59, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
> 1. You don't allow any TLS versions below 1.2. While that may seem to be
> a safety measure, it actually can cause problems because a client that
> does not support v1.2 or v1.3 can only resort to sending in clear text.
>
> 2. Your server is
On 23/09/2020 14:23, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> I note http://www.postfix.org/BDAT_README.html#downsides
IMHO there is some bogus advice there. If Postfix's
"reject_unauth_pipelining" is not working aright
then you can't trust it to work right, barring some
CHUNKING-specific bug
On 22/09/2020 17:10, Christian Eyrich via Exim-users wrote:
> 20 212.227.15.19 → 94.16.119.13 SMTP 85 C: EHLO mout.gmx.net
> 21 94.16.119.13 → 212.227.15.19 SMTP 224 S: 250-mail.eyrich-net.org:
> Hello mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19] | 250-SIZE 52428800 | 250-8BITMIME |
> 250-PIPELINING |
On 22/09/2020 01:41, Jim Fenton via Exim-users wrote:
> I’m not sure whether
> this would be considered a bug or just a misconfiguration, but I’m happy
> to create a bug report if appropriate.
Yes please; any crash that can be induced by a particular config is
a bug, even if the config is not
On 21/09/2020 20:34, Danielle McLeod via Exim-users wrote:
> I'm trying to make it so only a certain IP range will be allowed through
> Exim to a specific domain, with other domains unaffected by this ACL.
OK, ACL's chapter in the docs. And you're looking at the sender's IP.
This is available is
On 21/09/2020 09:34, Dan Egli via Exim-users wrote:
> Forgive me for being a bit dense, but I'm new to the SSL world. I have
> certificates by LetsEncrypt, generated about a month ago. Where and how
> do I look to determine if I need new certificates. And what's with the
> TLSA DNS entries? I've
On 19/09/2020 05:08, Jim Fenton via Exim-users wrote:
> On 9/18/20 5:09 PM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> Related question: when a router does a headers_add, does it only do that
> if that router accepts?
The documentation does say, in the obvious place:
"a list o
On 17/09/2020 23:30, Jim Fenton via Exim-users wrote:
> So instead I have tried putting into my mail_spool transport:
>
> headers_add = ${authresults {$primary_hostname}}
>
> but I'm not seeing the header field in locally-delivered messages (yes,
> I am using mail_spool local delivery). Is this
On 18/09/2020 09:13, Henry Pootel via Exim-users wrote:
> I would like to deprecate find usernames for special uids and take
> default username(s) (if it necessary for exim). Is it possible?
No. That would be a security breach. We want to know
what the actual user is, for a message being sent
On 17/09/2020 20:56, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> PGSQL new connection: socket=/var/run/postgresql database=) user=dfctl
> lookup deferred: PGSQL invalid filename for socket: /var/run/postgresql
>
> I'm not sure what's exactly invalid here. But it's not what I configured
> either. This
On 17/09/2020 20:32, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> exim -bt demo@test.local
exim -d -bt demo@test.local
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
On 17/09/2020 10:23, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> But how can I manually debug SPF? Is there something I can write on the
> command line to test the built-in SPF facility?
-bh option on the exim command line. You might want to combine
that with -d use.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On 17/09/2020 04:54, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> What causes Exim to just silently skip SPF checking?
Without a debug run demonstrating the syndrome we can't
be certain. Without seeing your config, we can't even guess.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 16/09/2020 22:40, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
>> The PAM module is initialized with the service name “exim”
>
> Can I change this?
No, it's hardwired.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
On 15/09/2020 10:27, Henry Pootel via Exim-users wrote:
> exim panic and say "Failed to get user name for uid 2045 ..."
> Yes, the uid has not a user name in /etc/passwd.
>
> Can I set user names for my uids to exim wo change system /etc/passwd
No.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 15/09/2020 03:01, Marc MERLIN via Exim-users wrote:
> Either way, the debian10 Email isn't going through.
>
> Ok, so now I'm comparing the rest of the d+all that works (9) vs the one that
> doesn't (10)
You're not showing the debug from early enough. We need the point where
exim decides to
On 15/09/2020 00:29, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> So, exim -d+all does not make it very clear that TLS is even failing and
(I don't see that, in your output below)
> that AUTH is being done without TLS,
Nope.
> which is why it fails.
And therefore, nope.
> Both use the exact same
On 11/09/2020 19:23, Marc MERLIN via Exim-users wrote:
> Is there really no way for exim to show me the entire smtp session
> without obfuscating it
Not without modifying source code.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
>> Marc MERLIN via Exim-users (Do 10 Sep 2020 21:24:51
>> CEST):
>>> Howdy,
>>> I have Exim version 4.92 #3 built 07-May-2019 17:44:23
Note that Buster, at least, is showing 4.92-8+deb10u4
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 11/09/2020 03:02, Marc MERLIN via Exim-users wrote:
> If I run exim -d+all my-em...@domain.tld , I'd like to see the entire
> SMTP connection decrypted.
> However, it is not shown.
The authentication info is such an obvious security hole
that the data is deliberately overwritten, in the
On 10/09/2020 20:24, Marc MERLIN via Exim-users wrote:
> I have an issue where some Emails go to the backup MX, then the backup
> MX sends to the main MX, and the mail gets delivered to my mailbox, but
> the transaction isn't finished in a way that the backup knows the mail
> went through, so it
701 - 800 of 3189 matches
Mail list logo
