Hi,
I have set up a ratelimit for my users and also a whitelist-file.
The acl for the ratelimit looks like this:
defer authenticated = *
ratelimit = 30 / 5m / strict / $authenticated_id
condition =
${lookup{$sender_address}nwildlsearch{/usr/local/etc/exim/conf/ratelimit_whitelist}{no}
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users @ 2023-01-26 14:23 :
> On 26/01/2023 10:31, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
>> with a score of -12.6
>
> How was that part verified?
Thanks - I shouldn’t write to mailing lists when I have a cold. I was mislead
by the original mail from the
Hi!
I deny messages in an acl if they have a score of more than 8 or 12:
(shortened version with less conditions, that are not relevant here probably):
deny message = delivery error with obfuscating details
condition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{120}{1}{0}}
Usually this is no problem. But now I h
Maybe you should tell us what you want to do.
Best,
Niels
On 26. Dec 2022, at 10:27, Askhat Tokabay
wrote:
�
Thanks,
as I understand it,
the delivery process,
that the message has arrived,
can be told by the process of
receiving the message,
which puts
Hi,
>
> On 26. Dec 2022, at 09:41, Askhat Tokabay via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> Helo
> I found in the documentation:
> Delivery processes may be started as a
> result of a message’s arrival, by a queue runner process,
> or by an administrator using the -M option.
>
> The question is the follow
On 3 Nov 2021, at 9:31, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dňa 3. 11. o 4:30 Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users napísal(a):
>> LOG: lowest numbered MX record points to local host: senderdomain.com (while
>> verifying from host rs224.mailgun.us
>> [209.61.151.224])
On 2 Nov 2021, at 22:56, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 02/11/2021 20:29, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
>> ::1 in "0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8 : 192.168.0.0/16 : 10.0.0.0/8 : 172.16.0.0/12
>> : [::1/128]"? no (malformed IPv4 address or address mask)
&g
On 2 Nov 2021, at 20:39, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> wrote:
>> What setting do I have to make in the dnslookup-router that a “MX 0
>> localhost.” fails
Hi,
I have a sender who sends from a domain with a null MX set to localhost. Exim
returns a 451 loca temporary failure because the dnslookup router defers the
mail (lowest mx points at localhost).
I would expect some form of 500-type error returning.
When I send a mail to that domain it also g
On 5 Jul 2021, at 15:09, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Niels Kobschätzki (Mo 05 Jul 2021 13:54:47 CEST):
>>
>>> addresses the users sends mails to in a given time frame.
>>>
>>> ratelimit = … / per_addr
>>
>> According to the documentation: “The per_addr option is like the
On 5 Jul 2021, at 14:00, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Am 05.07.21 um 13:19 schrieb Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users:
The problem is the identification because you usually get to know it
only, when the accounts are actively misused. If I get to know that
users where specifically targeted I
On 5 Jul 2021, at 7:48, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users (Mo 05 Jul 2021
> 05:40:04 CEST):
>> I have again and again problems with phished users. I want to try a new way
>> to deal with them but I worry tha
On 5 Jul 2021, at 13:25, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. Juli 2021, 13:19:45 CEST schrieb Niels Kobschätzki:
>> The moment I identify them I lock them out of the system, remove all their
>> mails in the queues and they have to reset their password before they can
>> do any
On 5 Jul 2021, at 13:06, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. Juli 2021, 09:04:16 CEST schrieb Niels Kobschätzki:
>> On 5 Jul 2021, at 7:54, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users wrote:
>> Phished users are users from my mail system which are proven regular users
>> who have their accounts for year
On 5 Jul 2021, at 7:48, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users (Mo 05 Jul 2021
> 05:40:04 CEST):
>> I have again and again problems with phished users. I want to try a new way
>> to deal with them but I worry tha
On 5 Jul 2021, at 7:54, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. Juli 2021, 05:40:04 CEST schrieb Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-
> users:
>> I have again and again problems with phished users.
> just my view to this:
>
> what are "phished users"?
Phish
Hi,
I have again and again problems with phished users. I want to try a new way to
deal with them but I worry that I mess up parts of our monitoring.
One sign of a phished user (if they do not try to log in from lots of different
countries) is that they amass in a short time quite some time in m
On 19 May 2021, at 14:26, Peter Wullinger wrote:
> On 19.05.21 09:14, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
>> But is there a way to randomize how the spam-servers are tried? I have one
>> machine that has always a very high load and the other machines are a bit
>> bor
On 19 May 2021, at 9:46, Kai Bojens via Exim-users wrote:
Am 19.05.21 um 09:14 schrieb Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users:
But is there a way to randomize how the spam-servers are tried?
You could use a hostname and round robin DNS. That would distribute
the load in a random way
Hi,
it is possible to add multiple IPs to the av_scanner- and the
spamd_address-settings like this:
spamd_address = 10.10.10.10 783 : 11.11.11.11 783 : 12.12.12.12 783
It seems that the machines always try first 10.10.10.10, then 11.11.11.11 and
then 12.12.12.12
I know that I can give prioritie
Hi,
I found the problem. The server accessed the wrong configuration file because
of a missing symlink.
Best
Niels
> On 28. Apr 2021, at 02:07, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have here a router which yields tainted data and I don‘t understand why -
> especially since it works on s
Hi,
I have here a router which yields tainted data and I don‘t understand why -
especially since it works on some machines and not on others:
Log-output:
exim -v -bt t...@domain.com
LOG: MAIN PANIC
Tainted filename '/usr/local/etc/exim/redirects/domain.com'
t...@jobcenter-ge.de cannot be res
On 16 Mar 2021, at 20:27, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 16/03/2021 19:05, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
is there any way that I could set recipients_max by default to
let’s say 50 but for special senders set a higher limit (like
1000)?
In ACLs or routers I can use
Hi,
is there any way that I could set recipients_max by default to let’s
say 50 but for special senders set a higher limit (like 1000)?
In ACLs or routers I can use conditions and stuff like that. For example
I have a router with
senders = nwildlsearch;/etc/exim/conf/ratelimit_whitelist
and
On 19 Jan 2021, at 10:19, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 19/01/2021 08:55, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I have the following case: I have users who have their
mail-address
aliased to an external address. The moment a router resolves the
alias
it doesn’t go again for the
On 19 Jan 2021, at 9:48, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 09:40:03AM +0100, Niels Kobschätzki via
Exim-users wrote:
But there are several routers before the dnslookup-router and the
debug-output does not indicate that they are checked before.
Are they checked
On 19 Jan 2021, at 9:46, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:40, Niels Kobschätzki
wrote:
On 19 Jan 2021, at 9:36, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:31, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
Hi,
I have the following c
On 19 Jan 2021, at 9:36, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:31, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
Hi,
I have the following case: I have users who have their mail-address
aliased to an external address. The moment a router resolves the
al
Hi,
I have the following case: I have users who have their mail-address
aliased to an external address. The moment a router resolves the alias
it doesn’t go again for the new target address through all routers but
jumps directly the router to my dnslookup-router which is used for
external mai
not in the H file, they are
either in the D file or are getting added by some rule in your
exim.conf or a file included by it. So check the -D, and if it's not
there then search your configs.
If that's not working, can you post the output of the -Mvc?
On 1/5/2021 3:39 PM, Niels Kobsc
the .db files and restart exim so that it rebuilds them. If it's a
> different problem that one of those, then explain exactly what you mean by
> the header being in the system twice.
>
>
>> On 1/5/2021 5:55 AM, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
>> Hi,
>
Hi,
I am finally working on changing my config to wo 4.94. There is one
thing I could not get working so far and this led to mails being in
limbo on my secondary mx. I would need to delete a certain header once
from those mails because now it is twice in the mails. When it is only
once in the
On 29 Oct 2020, at 13:30, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 29/10/2020 12:06, Wolfgang Breyha via Exim-users wrote:
On 29/10/2020 12:45, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 29/10/2020 11:21, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I got a message from a user that our exim apparently
Hi,
I got a message from a user that our exim apparently sends a wrong
status code on full mailboxes.
Something like this:
550 Mailbox is full
550 5.1.1 u...@domain.com… User unknown
So on a Mailbox is full a User unknown seems to be returned on a full
mailbox. In my
In my acl I have wher
> On 24. Jul 2020, at 14:04, Yves ROUX via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> have users that put hundreds of addresses in their TO, CC or CCI fields.
> I know this is bad practice and they should use maillists, but most of
> them don't know how to do this.
> So to avoid overloading distant reci
On 13 Jul 2020, at 14:38, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 13/07/2020 12:56, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I am looking through the documentation and the mailing list but I
cannot
find out how to convert this simple acl:
deny message = Invalid user
domains
Hi,
I am looking through the documentation and the mailing list but I cannot
find out how to convert this simple acl:
deny message = Invalid user
domains =
partial-lsearch;/usr/local/etc/exim/conf/secondary_filter_domains
local_parts =
!nwildlsearch;/usr/local/etc/exim/conf
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
On 18/11/2019 12:31, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
this variable contains the domain. In particular, it is set
during user
since a message may have many
recipients
Doh. I should have remembered that. You'll need to either
decide your p
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
On 18/11/2019 09:20, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I know that there is a setting message_size_limit and that I
can control it
globally and per router.
I accept mails for a lot of domains and for some of those
domains I'd
like to
h
Hi,
I know that there is a setting message_size_limit and that I can
control it
globally and per router.
I accept mails for a lot of domains and for some of those domains
I'd like to
have a bigger message_size_limit than for the rest. Those domains
are already
handled differently but I am no
40 matches
Mail list logo
