Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
big'uns duke it out.
Miark
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 00:27:26 -0300, Sergio Javier Belkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I would want to hear something simil
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 04:59 pm, Andy Davidson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:01:56PM -0500, Jonathan Shilling wrote:
> > Actually, if I recall correctly SCO stated that it is $699, and no I am
> > _NOT_ going to pay them. :P
>
> There are too many numbers running around. The $699\$1399
and on that track...
on every SMP system, each CPU would only be running a percentage
of a given install so ech CPU could only be charged a percentage
of a single CPU licensing fee
*g*
--- Original Message ---
From: Richard Bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Oh
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:36:11 -0400
Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:50 pm, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> > > Anyone know if the built in NIC in this motherboard is
> > > unsupported?
>
> > It is a RhineII and uses the via-rhine driver. W
On Sunday 10 Aug 2003 3:29 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 04:26 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Friday 08 August 2003 10:37 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Friday 08 Aug 2003 3:27 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:50 pm, Felix Miata wrote:
> > > > > Anyone k
Thank everybody!
El Jue 07 Ago 2003 03:38, Tom Brinkman escribió:
> On Wednesday August 6 2003 11:12 pm, Sergio Javier Belkin wrote:
> > There is a way to install a rpm even if it is already installed
> > with --force when using rpm, but the question is exists a similar
> > option for urpmi.
>
>
I am trying to install 9.1 PPC on an IBM RS/6000 44P Model 270 with a WYSE
WY-60 hooked up to it. I have made the boot floppies and changed the prom:
setenv boot-device boot floppy:\zimage
setenv boot-file fake_initrd root=/dev/fd0 rw load_ramdisk=1
ramdisk_size=36000
boot
After it starts to b
lorne wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 11:57 am, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I have copied a Drive volume and I am preparing to mount it via the USB
Port. Diskdrake Correctly identifies the filesystem as a Novell Netware
3.xx or 4.xx filesystem type.
However I cannot mount the disk. the
correction
Really how do I get in to expert mode in drakxconnect. I know how to in
harddrake
-Original Message-
From: Lawson, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [expert] Mandrake 9.1 Versus 9.0
Really how do I get
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 16:15, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Damon Lynch wanted us to know:
>
> >> "I don't care that you are using a journalized filesystem like ext3, I
> >> want you to do a full blown filesystem check as if you were ext2."
> >So why does
Any one know how Mandrakes stands against SCO. I have not heard a work about
this.
James S. Lawson
Network Administrator
(@ @)
oOO--(_)--OOo-
Notice: This message, and any attached file, is intended only for the
charlie wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 02:47 am, Eric Fernandez wholly or partly mentioned :-
These are donations given to Free projects supported by Mandrake:
"Mandrake Linux Open Source developments", not to the Mandrakesoft
company.These donations cannot help Mandrakesoft (the company) decrease
I tried your suggestion. It comes back with this instead
The directory of kernel headers (version 2.4.21-0.13mdkcustom) does not
match
your running kernel (version 2.4.21-0.13mdksmp). Even if the module were to
compile successfully, it would not load into the running kernel.
Any more suggestion
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:44 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
> > Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
> > I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
> > big'uns duke it out.
> >
> > Miark
>
> What
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 03:24 pm, Frankie wholly or partly mentioned :-
> I think IBM and Novell should get together and counter sue SCO for making
> unproven claims and trying to extort their linux clients. Have SCO barred
> from making such claims till its proven in court. In other words, "put up
> or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Does anyone have any wisdom they would care to share in regards to running
> Mandrake on a dual processor box?
>
> I am thinking in particular of dual-Athlon boxes, and in particular
> particular (!) of buying a Cybertron dual-Athlon box, and would
16 matches
Mail list logo
