On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 01:40:37 +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual property
infringement regarding IBM's contributions to GNU/Linux. SCO's actions are NOT
good for Linux or open source, and we the community should
On Saturday March 8 2003 05:21 pm, Joeb wrote:
Anyway, as I have said before, IANAL, so I'll let the free software
foundation make their arguments. I'm sure they will do a much
better job than I could do!
Joeb
Only thing I know about court cases is the outcome is rarely
based on
On Saturday 08 March 2003 02:21 pm, Joeb wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:11:23 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:53 pm, Joeb wrote:
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their
billion... are you referring to SCO or the lawyers (not
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their billion... are you
referring to SCO or the lawyers (not that it makes much difference)? :)
Way I see it, there are a couple of questions. Q1) Was IBM entitled to use the code?
A1) Yes, that is not part of the litigation. Q2) Was
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:53 pm, Joeb wrote:
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their billion...
are you referring to SCO or the lawyers (not that it makes much
difference)? :)
Way I see it, there are a couple of questions. Q1) Was IBM entitled to use
the code? A1)
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:11:23 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:53 pm, Joeb wrote:
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their billion...
are you referring to SCO or the lawyers (not that it makes much
difference)? :)
Way I see it,
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual property
infringement regarding IBM's contributions to GNU/Linux. SCO's actions are NOT
good for Linux or open source, and we the community should not stand for it.
PCLinuxOnline has decided to respond by boycotting SCO and its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 07 March 2003 09:40 am, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual
property infringement regarding IBM's contributions to GNU/Linux. SCO's
actions are NOT good for Linux or open source,
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 06:40, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual property
infringement regarding IBM's contributions to GNU/Linux. SCO's actions are NOT
good for Linux or open source, and we the community should not stand for it.
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 06:40, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual property
infringement regarding IBM's contributions to GNU/Linux. SCO's actions are NOT
good for Linux or open source, and we the community should not stand for it.
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Sparenberg
Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2003 3:20 AM
To: Expert List
Subject: Re: [expert] [OT] SCO sues IBM over Linux and UNIX
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 06:40, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Coates wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:55:41AM -0800 :
SCO has decided to sue IBM for $US1 billion for alleged intellectual
property infringement regarding IBM's contributions to GNU/Linux.
They are of course shooting themselves with this
Jack Coates wrote:
They are of course shooting themselves with this action... however, I
beleive the applicable terms might be euthanasia or self-inflicted coup
de grace :-) Seen any SCO or Caldera out there in the real world lately?
I haven't. They're as dead as OS/2 already and are trying
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 21:05, Felix Miata wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
They are of course shooting themselves with this action... however, I
beleive the applicable terms might be euthanasia or self-inflicted coup
de grace :-) Seen any SCO or Caldera out there in the real world lately?
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
