On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:14:04 -0500
Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:48:26 -0800 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I didn't even get the connect... but as strange as my nets been today
> > I'm not suprised. If 8200 isn't working then the problem is not
> > p
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:48:26 -0800 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't even get the connect... but as strange as my nets been today
> I'm not suprised. If 8200 isn't working then the problem is not
> perl-httpd, or so I would think. Now for any who know, is this
> something that should
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:11:26 -0500
Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:21:46 -0800 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Pierre,
> > I never doubted you. Just wondering how it was supposed to work
> > when it's bad that is. To clear up turning off pro
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:21:46 -0800 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre,
> I never doubted you. Just wondering how it was supposed to work
> when it's bad that is. To clear up turning off proxy, are you
> refering to removing the following line from httpd.conf?
[snip]
Yes; turn
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:42:22 -0500
Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:33:00 -0600 "J. Craig Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > James wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 20:26, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > > > Ooops... forgot to add that I needed to hi
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:33:00 -0600 "J. Craig Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> James wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 20:26, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > > Ooops... forgot to add that I needed to hit Return after sending
> > > > the GET; so the full instructions are:
> > > >
> > > >te
James wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 20:26, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > Ooops... forgot to add that I needed to hit Return after sending the GET;
> > > so the full instructions are:
> > >
> > >telnet 80
> > >GET http:// HTTP/1.0
> > >
> > >
> > > Without the extra return, the com
On 11 Mar 2002 09:18:58 -0500
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 20:26, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > Ooops... forgot to add that I needed to hit Return after sending the GET;
> > so the full instructions are:
> >
> >telnet 80
> >GET http:// HTTP/1.0
> >
> >
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:31:24 -0600 Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The latest apache, 1.3.23, disables the passthrough feature by default
> -- I'm not sure about the 2.x series, since I've not used it.
When I found this, I checked the www.apache.org (2.0.32) and it was either
correctl
The latest apache, 1.3.23, disables the passthrough feature by default --
I'm not sure about the 2.x series, since I've not used it.
Michael
--
Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Database Administrator / Web Statistician
Simple End User Linux
At 09:18 AM 3/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>On Sun, 2002
On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 20:26, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> Ooops... forgot to add that I needed to hit Return after sending the GET;
> so the full instructions are:
>
>telnet 80
>GET http:// HTTP/1.0
>
>
> Without the extra return, the command "just sits" there as you discovered.
>
> Sor
Ooops... forgot to add that I needed to hit Return after sending the GET;
so the full instructions are:
telnet 80
GET http:// HTTP/1.0
Without the extra return, the command "just sits" there as you discovered.
Sorry for the oversight,
Pierre
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:01:13 -0700 Ken T
Pierre,
When I do that I get the html from this server then the connection is "closed
by forign host"
Before the "GET" command, nothing, just sits there waiting for input.
But, it doesn't get any info from the server I tried, www.foo.com format..
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:41 pm, you wrote:
> FY
FYI...
I found a scumbag using my web server to hide behind while [s]he accessed
other servers.
Mandrake: your server is also configured to allow these passthrough
requests!
To test your server, issue these comamds:
telnet 80
GET http:// HTTP/1.0
If you get the output from , is all
14 matches
Mail list logo
