Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-07 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:05, Michael Adams wrote: On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:56:16 +0200 T. Ribbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact, if you leave reply-to unset, all replies to mail you send will be sent back to the address you are sending from, except in such cases as the mailing

Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-07 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 21:33, T. Ribbrock wrote: ... Dunno what list reply you refer to. Then your mail program doesn't seem to have it. In mutt, if I hit r for reply, I reply to the sender, i.e. to whoever is in From:, unless it's overruled by Reply-To:. When I hit g for group-reply, I

Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-07 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 22:03, James Sparenberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:05, Michael Adams wrote: On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:56:16 +0200 T. Ribbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact, if you leave reply-to unset, all replies to mail you send will be sent back to the address you

Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-07 Thread Phil G.
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:49:02 -0700, James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I don't get the mail from the sender ... I get it from the list. The reply to isn't set it's exactly as it should be ... from the sender. Which in this case is the list server. Not you or any other individual.

[expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-06 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:12:08AM -0700, Rolf Pedersen wrote: If I understand you, there is no need to set your mail agent's reply-to to the list. Personally, I hardly ever set a Reply-To... In fact, if you leave reply-to unset, all replies to mail you send will be sent back to the

Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 09:56, T. Ribbrock wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:12:08AM -0700, Rolf Pedersen wrote: If I understand you, there is no need to set your mail agent's reply-to to the list. Personally, I hardly ever set a Reply-To... In fact, if you leave reply-to unset, all

Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-06 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Monday 06 October 2003 06:49 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 09:56, T. Ribbrock wrote: snip On second thought, I realize that I might be forgetting that there are too many mail clients that don't have list-reply, which is a pity. Great functionality. Dunno what

Re: [expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-06 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:56:16 +0200 T. Ribbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact, if you leave reply-to unset, all replies to mail you send will be sent back to the address you are sending from, except in such cases as the mailing lists, where replies ought to be automatically sent to

[expert] Re: Reply-to

2003-10-06 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:49:02PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: I don't get the mail from the sender ... I get it from the list. Well, here, all mails are From: the person who sent it, which makes sense, as the list server just re-sends them. But the Reply-To header of the list does change