Hi!
I have submited over a dozen of bugs, THAT ARE NOT IN BUG ARCHIVE YET
and got no replay, and bugs are not added! What is going on on this
field??
Bye, Alen
--
*---*
*E-Mail: Alen Salamun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
* LiNUX - The choice
Alen Salamun wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have submited over a dozen of bugs, THAT ARE NOT IN BUG ARCHIVE YET
> and got no replay, and bugs are not added! What is going on on this
> field??
That's because they were evaluated and found not to be bugs.
You are attributing configuration errors to bugs. I
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> That's because they were evaluated and found not to be bugs.
Hi!
Hehehe...Yeah right...THIS ARE BUGS:
SO HERE IS MY "BUG" LIST (for 7.0):
- In installation procedure things ALWAYS hang, if I select that
Mandrake should install driver for my Initio SCSI controler. Mod
:25 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] What is going on with BUG tracking??
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > That's because they were evaluated and found not to be bugs.
> Hi!
>
> Hehehe...Yeah right...THIS ARE BUGS:
>
> SO HERE IS MY "BUG" LIST (for 7.0):
>
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > That's because they were evaluated and found not to be bugs.
> Hi!
>
For WHICH security level are you installing? It's my
understanding that there are several levels of "security"
and that this security level affects which packages a
Alen Salamun wrote:
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > That's because they were evaluated and found not to be bugs.
> Hi!
>
> Hehehe...Yeah right...THIS ARE BUGS:
This? Or these?
> - Kernel WON'T recompile if you try to compile NON SMP kernel! You have
> to run make mrproper first, then it works
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
>
> - Kernel WON'T recompile if you try to compile NON SMP kernel! You have
> to run make mrproper first, then it works! Ok this one is KNOWN already
> but no fix is out! I know how to find solution, but some newbie
> doesn't..
>
Almost
Thomas McLaughlin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> > "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> >
> > - Kernel WON'T recompile if you try to compile NON SMP kernel! You have
> > to run make mrproper first, then it works! Ok this one is KNOWN already
> > but no fix is out! I know how to find solution
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> Newbies normally aren't recompiling kernels =)
I have a feeling you guys here are NOT serious...THESE ARE THING NOONE
SHOULD EVEN
THINK ABOUT NOT FIXING THEM! This should be fixed right away with no
questions asked...
If not just say: Mandrake is just a non supported, h
It's just that I have a different conception of "bug" than you do.
To me, a bug is bum code. Code with errors in it. Most of what you're
complaining about are plain-jane configuration issues -- stuff not
installed, stuff not configured.
Linux does not configure itself, no matter what distro you
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > > bin86?
> > Hey are you all joking or what: bin86-0.4-9mdk
>
> You did a server install, right?
hi!
It was a normal "SERVER" installI just used preselected packets and
that is...And I installed
more than one Mandrake server util now...It was always missing...
Alen Salamun wrote:
>
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > > > bin86?
> > > Hey are you all joking or what: bin86-0.4-9mdk
> >
> > You did a server install, right?
> hi!
>
> It was a normal "SERVER" installI just used preselected packets and
> that is...And I installed
> more than one Mandrake se
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > > > bin86?
> > > Hey are you all joking or what: bin86-0.4-9mdk
> >
> > You did a server install, right?
> hi!
>
> It was a normal "SERVER" installI just used preselected packets and
> that is...And I installed
> more than one M
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
>
> It's just that I have a different conception of "bug" than you do.
>
> To me, a bug is bum code. Code with errors in it. Most of what you're
> complaining about are plain-jane configuration issues -- stuff not
> installed, stuff not configured.
>
> Linux does not c
"Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
> "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> >
> > It's just that I have a different conception of "bug" than you do.
> >
> > To me, a bug is bum code. Code with errors in it. Most of what you're
> > complaining about are plain-jane configuration issues -- stuff not
> > install
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
>
> "Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
>
> > "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > >
> > > It's just that I have a different conception of "bug" than you do.
> > >
> > > To me, a bug is bum code. Code with errors in it. Most of what you're
> > > complaining about are plain-jane c
"Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
> That's preposterous. What do we have distributions *for* if not to get
> things like file permissions right? Why bother with things like RPM
> files at all?
Hi!
Exactly my point. The main advantage of RPM-s is that I don't bother
with all this stuff, but just
For years I lusted for a *perfect* operating system. So I bought
Winblows, only to discover that 90% of the "PC compatable software"
caused my machine to crash, lock up and puke blue screens.
Then I started hearing whispers about a new OS called Linux. " It's
stable," they said. "It'll run for y
18 matches
Mail list logo
