Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-14 Thread Tony McGee
12, 2000 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [expert] backround processes > I think you didn't understood my question. > > I want to not allow my machine's users to run any backround processes such > as eggdrop etc > > > > Regards, > Janar Kokk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-12 Thread Ken Wilson
Have you thought about just turfing those users who won't play by the rules? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian T. Schellenberger Sent: July 12, 2000 8:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] backround processes

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-12 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger
Deryk Barker wrote: > > Thus spake Ellick Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > [...] > > If I remember correctly, ulimit has a rather poor manpage. > > I'll say. Basically it says see bash. Which limits its utility a bit. I, for one, get: > ulimit ulimit: Command not found. Why? Becuase I use tcsh .

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-12 Thread Deryk Barker
Thus spake Ellick Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [...] > If I remember correctly, ulimit has a rather poor manpage. I'll say. Basically it says see bash. > It can control > mem usage/processes, but is enforced by your shell(bash). I was trying to > use it to control runaway processes such as Netsca

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-12 Thread Ellick Chan
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Civileme wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:34:12 -0800 > From: Civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] backround processes > > > > Deryk Barker wrote: > > &g

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-12 Thread Ellick Chan
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Janar Kokk wrote: > Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 02:36:46 +0200 > From: Janar Kokk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] backround processes > > I think you didn't understood my quest

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-11 Thread Nightwriter
Sorry for butting in again, but one possibility might be to do what is done By Bastille Linux and make it impossible for users to compile anything on the computer. Limiting that ability to root only. This wouldn't prevent a binary load I know but if they can't compile and only root can access

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-11 Thread Civileme
Deryk Barker wrote: > Thus spake Janar Kokk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > I think you didn't understood my question. > > > > I want to not allow my machine's users to run any backround processes such > > as eggdrop etc > > You can use ulimit to limit the number of processes, but don't set it > to

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-11 Thread Deryk Barker
Thus spake Janar Kokk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I think you didn't understood my question. > > I want to not allow my machine's users to run any backround processes such > as eggdrop etc You can use ulimit to limit the number of processes, but don't set it to 1 or they won't be able to run *anythi

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-11 Thread Janar Kokk
CTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 6:36 PM Subject: Re: [expert] backround processes > Use the & after the program name: ie gftp &, netscape & >

Re: [expert] backround processes

2000-07-11 Thread Cecil Watson
Use the & after the program name: ie gftp &, netscape &

[expert] backround processes

2000-07-11 Thread Janar Kokk
Hello, How can i make so, that my users cant run any backround processes? Regards, Janar Kokk [EMAIL PROTECTED]