Re: [expert] diskdrake sucks

2002-11-06 Thread Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
Weird, I used DrakConf to repartition a HD and it worked pretty well. However, DrakConf only works with fat32 and ext2 filesystem, not with NTFS. Thats why I think you lost your fstab. Cheers, On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Miark wrote: > He is right, however, that it would be nice to have the option of

Re: [expert] diskdrake sucks

2002-11-05 Thread Miark
He is right, however, that it would be nice to have the option of automatically re-writing fstab, similar to the way PartionMagic remaps drives. I'm a little surprised they haven't done that already. Miark On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:35:09 + Daryl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And yet cu

Re: [expert] diskdrake sucks

2002-11-05 Thread Daryl Johnson
And yet curiously, when you run DiskDrake, the first message you get is an injunction to ensure that your data is backed up >o> Anytime you decide to re-partition or resize your drive(s) you are dicing with (disk) disaster. It is pointless to complain afterwards about the effects of a reparti

[expert] diskdrake sucks

2002-11-05 Thread Steffen Barszus
Hi ! First of all I want to explain my environment: I had 3 ntfs partitions (500MB, 10Gig, 800MB), 2 Fat32 Partitions (2x10 Gig),3 Gig ext3 for system, 5 Gig Reiser for home and a littlebit swap. Today I tought I didn't need that 800 Meg Ntfs and could delete it and make a ext3 out of that. S

[expert] Diskdrake has a mind of it's own?

2002-07-02 Thread Richie de Almeida
OK, what sort of voodoo must I do to get DiskDrake to make two new ReiserFS partitions? I have tried three times now, each time I set the partition sizes and select ReiserFS as the type, DiskDrake tells me to reset the computer-- being an ex-Windows user, I don't blink twice at this...! The

[expert] DiskDrake not writing /etc/fstab

2001-12-15 Thread Albert E. Whale
Hmm, this is curious. I have selected the Expert mode for diskdrake, and can no longer get it to update the /etc/fstab with the current list of mount points. I have the following packages: mandrake-release-7.2-1mdk mandrake_desk-7.2-18mdk menudrake-0.2-4mdk userdrake-0.3-2mdk harddrake-0.9.3-11

[expert] diskdrake

2000-09-30 Thread David Boles
Is DiskDrake non-destructive? Does it expand/shrink partitions without destroying the data? -- --- David Boles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

[expert] diskdrake

2000-09-30 Thread David Boles
Is DiskDrake non-destructive? Does it expand/shrink partitions without destroying the data? -- --- David Boles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-23 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Chmouelthanks again. Although I can't install it on my 6.1 system because of dependencies on newt-0.40, oh well!! Alan Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Chmoueltrue, diskdrake has disappeared from the rpms in cooker. And > > drakxtools is t

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-23 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote: > Chmoueltrue, diskdrake has disappeared from the rpms in cooker. And > drakxtools is there, but when I try and install it a dependency on > libnewt.so.0.50 stops the install and there is nothing in the rpms named > libnewt? :-) > > Alan So, A)

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-23 Thread Sylvain Vignaud
Alan Shoemaker wrote: > > Chmoueltrue, diskdrake has disappeared from the rpms in cooker. And > drakxtools is there, but when I try and install it a dependency on > libnewt.so.0.50 stops the install and there is nothing in the rpms named > libnewt? :-) package newt-* is present in last Cooke

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-22 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Chmoueltrue, diskdrake has disappeared from the rpms in cooker. And drakxtools is there, but when I try and install it a dependency on libnewt.so.0.50 stops the install and there is nothing in the rpms named libnewt? :-) Alan Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-21 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > SteveThanks. I tried your suggestion but it didn't run that way > > either. I logged in as root, opened an X-session and then opened a > > Konsole window and > > [...] > > > Use of uninitialized value at dis

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-21 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Steve Philp wrote: > > Alan Shoemaker wrote: [SNIP] > > got a pretty similar net result, it didn't run. > > Except this time it's not a permissions problem, it's a missing file > problem! > > You'll need to find the events_pend.al file that's necessary to run > diskdrake. Or, if

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-21 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Axalon Bloodstone wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote: [SNIP] > > got a pretty similar net result, it didn't run. > > > > Alan > > Make sure you have the latest of both diskdrake and perl-GTK, Gael > reported this one to me the other day but i still can't reproduc

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-21 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote: > SteveThanks. I tried your suggestion but it didn't run that way > either. I logged in as root, opened an X-session and then opened a > Konsole window and > > [root@alan /root]# diskdrake > * scsi devices are available > Use of uninitialized

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-21 Thread Steve Philp
Alan Shoemaker wrote: > > SteveThanks. I tried your suggestion but it didn't run that way > either. I logged in as root, opened an X-session and then opened a > Konsole window and [SNIP] > Use of uninitialized value at diskdrake.pm line 63 (#1) > * ERROR: Can't locate auto/Gtk

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-21 Thread Alan Shoemaker
SteveThanks. I tried your suggestion but it didn't run that way either. I logged in as root, opened an X-session and then opened a Konsole window and [root@alan /root]# diskdrake * scsi devices are available Use of uninitialized value at fs.pm line 27, chunk 12 (#1) (W) An undefi

Re: [expert] diskdrake

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Philp
Alan Shoemaker wrote: > > HelloI downloaded diskdrake from a cooker mirror today and got this > when I executed it: > > [root@alan alan]# diskdrake > * scsi devices are available > Use of uninitialized value at fs.pm line 27, chunk 12 (#1) > > (W) An undefined value was used as if it w

[expert] diskdrake

1999-11-20 Thread Alan Shoemaker
HelloI downloaded diskdrake from a cooker mirror today and got this when I executed it: [root@alan alan]# diskdrake * scsi devices are available Use of uninitialized value at fs.pm line 27, chunk 12 (#1) (W) An undefined value was used as if it were already defined. It was interpr

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-06 Thread Tom Berger
Will the Chill wrote: > > As always, this is a distinct possibility, but only as a LAST resort. > I'd rather find out what's available (and open) for linux first. Once I > get a reply from the author of ext2resize, I should pretty much have a > good idea of what's going on. Kindof odd, though,

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Ron Stodden
Will the Chill wrote: > As always, this is a distinct possibility, but only as a LAST resort. > I'd rather find out what's available (and open) for linux first. If you are running multiple operating systems, that answer is a BAD mistake, since you must have partition management software that is

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: Will the Chill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 1999 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [expert] DiskDrake > As always, this is a distinct possibility, but only as a LAST resort. > I'd rather find out what

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Will the Chill
As always, this is a distinct possibility, but only as a LAST resort. I'd rather find out what's available (and open) for linux first. Once I get a reply from the author of ext2resize, I should pretty much have a good idea of what's going on. Kindof odd, though, that nobody has used diskdrake ye

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Tom Berger
Will the Chill wrote: > > Right, the thing is this, though: diskdrake doesn't have any visible features that >actually PERFORM these actions. Of > course, I've already read through all of this on the diskdrake page, and it's FAQ. >However, John Harrold also replied, > saying that I could also

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Adam wrote: > I'm not sure who originally asked the question, but I found some info on it. > I've never used DiskDrake myself (for these reasons): > > >From the DiskDrake homepage: > "DiskDrake should be usable now... it can: > > create partitions > delet

Re: [expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Will the Chill
Right, the thing is this, though: diskdrake doesn't have any visible features that actually PERFORM these actions. Of course, I've already read through all of this on the diskdrake page, and it's FAQ. However, John Harrold also replied, saying that I could also use fips combined w/ ext2resize.

[expert] DiskDrake

1999-09-05 Thread Adam
I'm not sure who originally asked the question, but I found some info on it. I've never used DiskDrake myself (for these reasons): >From the DiskDrake homepage: "DiskDrake should be usable now... it can: create partitions delete partitions change type of partition

[expert] diskdrake

1999-09-05 Thread Will the Chill
Nobody has used diskdrake yet? If so, I still need suggestions on how to create, shrink, and grow partitions w/out destroying their contents. Thanks. -Will the Chill

[expert] diskdrake question

1999-09-04 Thread Will the Chill
Has anyone had a chance to use diskdrake yet? I was wondering if anyone has figured out how to do more than erase partitions. According to it's web page, it SHOULD be able to shrink and grow, and create new partitions. I have tried lot's of different commands, but can't find any that actually d