For my xine 0.913 is runing almost perfect under 9.2 and did also that under
8.2 (0.9.10 and 0.9.13)
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
El Jue 24 Oct 2002 19:25, ddc_prueba escribió:
I'm using 8.2 with:
libxine0-0.9.13-3plf
xmms-1.2.7-4mdk
and does NOT have that problem (and have never had
Bug (with solution)
I'm experiencing a funny bug here with xine. It only shows the video
output when xmms is up (but not playing anything). Audio works
flawlessly anytime.
If xmms is missing the video output is represented by a green area only.
This thing happens to me on two different
I'm using 8.2 with:
libxine0-0.9.13-3plf
xmms-1.2.7-4mdk
and does NOT have that problem (and have never had it before updating
xine from http://plf.zarb.org/ anyway maybe you should try to upgrade if
not having done to see if that helps.
Good luck.
El jue, 24-10-2002 a las 10:23, t_gecks
James wrote:
memory leaks my ass... :)
.. this sounds painful. Have you seen a doctor about this
condition?
--
daRcmaTTeR
Shit! Now that was funny. James, I just thought you might like to know
that you gave me my best laugh today. Funny stuff...
drjung
--
J. Craig Woods
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, J. Craig Woods wrote:
James wrote:
memory leaks my ass... :)
.. this sounds painful. Have you seen a doctor about this
condition?
--
daRcmaTTeR
Shit! Now that was funny. James, I just thought you might like to know
that you gave me my best laugh
John Aldrich wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, you wrote:
No, there's also Visio, PVCS, Visual Studio, Schedule+, Macromedia
Director, Adobe Premiere/AfterEffects, TruSpace, AutoCAD, etc., etc., etc.
Besides that, Star Office does not interoperate with my other desktop
applications.
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, you wrote:
No question. I just think you're seeing the glass as "half-empty"
when I'm seeing it as "half-full." ;-)
John
I think the glass is twice as big as it needs to be (hehehe)
Well.I think there's a lot of apps that currently run
only under
Well.I think there's a lot of apps that currently run
only under Windows, but which would be nice to have under
Linux. :-)
Yeah, like "Homeworld". Have you guys played that? It's
incredible.
Especially if you've read "Ender's Game".
--Derek
P.S. Should we rename this
:~For business use, you bet I'd do it. In a heartbeat. The only thing
:~holding me back right now is the non-availability of industry-specific
:~applications.
I have been doing it in our institute for the last two years. Last month I
have also installed two Mandrake boxes for our
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] funny
Date: Sunday, November 14, 1999 11:10 PM
RIGHT ON! Fortunately for me, I report to a CEO who is at the same
time
computer-challenged and industry-wise. I have begun moving Linux, NT
out. He
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, you wrote:
He obviously does not use, or do business with anyone who uses,
Quicken, TurboTax, Excel, Word, Powerpoint, need a powerfull graphics
editor, do any VB programming..
I think you understand.
There is a good "Excel-compatible" spreadsheet in
Christopher Cox wrote:
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] funny
Date: Sunday, November 14, 1999 11:10 PM
RIGHT ON! Fortunately for me, I report to a CEO who is at the same
time
computer-challenged and industry-wise. I have begun
Denis Havlik wrote:
Another problem is apparent lack of interest in security-related issues
here... If i start putting RedHat-s security updates on Mandrake machines,
sooner or later I will switch bach to RedHat. "Bind" beeing the latest,
and I do hope the LAST of those issues.
cu
Quicken, TurboTax, Excel, Word, Powerpoint, need a powerfull graphics
editor, do any VB programming..
I think you understand.
There is a good "Excel-compatible" spreadsheet in Star
[...]
compatible with Powerpoint. That only leaves Quicken, Turbotax and VB.
No,
There is a good "Excel-compatible" spreadsheet in Star
Office. Also SO is backwards-compatible with Office-97's
word DOC files. It is my understanding that GIMP is quite a
powerful graphics editor. Also, Star Office has a
presentatino program which I think is supposed to be
compatible with
Lets not forget access, visio and project!!!
Any suggestions?
Dunc
Christopher Cox wrote:
> There is a good "Excel-compatible" spreadsheet
in Star
> Office. Also SO is backwards-compatible with Office-97's
> word DOC files. It is my understanding that GIMP is quite a
> powerful graphics editor.
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
No, there's also Visio, PVCS, Visual Studio, Schedule+, Macromedia
Director, Adobe Premiere/AfterEffects, TruSpace, AutoCAD, etc., etc., etc.
Besides that, Star Office does not interoperate with my other desktop
applications.
I'm pretty
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Christopher Cox wrote:
I have yet to load Star Office, but have it sitting next to me. Gimp does
net even come close to a Image Composer of sorts. I will play with Star
Office to see what that plugs up. The off the shelf stuff like Quiken,
TurboTax and the lack of a VB
Chris Roupp wrote:
Humm... i wonder what that bogus address does to web bots. Might be a fun way
to make some bot traps.
-chris
If you don't run an HTTP server on the webbot machine, it will do
nothing.
--
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, you wrote:
No, there's also Visio, PVCS, Visual Studio, Schedule+, Macromedia
Director, Adobe Premiere/AfterEffects, TruSpace, AutoCAD, etc., etc., etc.
Besides that, Star Office does not interoperate with my other desktop
applications.
Agreed. However, I was
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, you wrote:
I have yet to load Star Office, but have it sitting next to me. Gimp does
net even come close to a Image Composer of sorts. I will play with Star
Office to see what that plugs up. The off the shelf stuff like Quiken,
TurboTax and the lack of a VB is really
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, you wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
No, there's also Visio, PVCS, Visual Studio, Schedule+, Macromedia
Director, Adobe Premiere/AfterEffects, TruSpace, AutoCAD, etc., etc., etc.
Besides that, Star Office does not interoperate with my other
I'm pretty sure there's an Xwindows version of PVCS.
Hmm. Didn't know that. :) I like CVS.
Anyway, I think it's about time we end this thread. It started on
a loopback DNS entry, and (so far) is somewhere near a long discussion of
LinuxBerg vs. Freshmeat vs.
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, John Aldrich wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, you wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
No, there's also Visio, PVCS, Visual Studio, Schedule+, Macromedia
Director, Adobe Premiere/AfterEffects, TruSpace, AutoCAD, etc., etc., etc.
Besides that,
: No, there's also Visio, PVCS, Visual Studio, Schedule+, Macromedia
:Director, Adobe Premiere/AfterEffects, TruSpace, AutoCAD, etc., etc., etc.
:Besides that, Star Office does not interoperate with my other desktop
:applications.
If you really have to use all of them, better stay with
Yeah, I felt a little foolish after I determined that www.redhat.org is
registered up to 127.0.0.1.
But in the other hand I would not put linux on a client of mine's desk at
this point. Closet, yes, desk, no (Linux is replacing some NT Unixware
servers). Mandrake has made some large strides in
Christopher Cox wrote:
Yeah, I felt a little foolish after I determined that www.redhat.org is
registered up to 127.0.0.1.
But in the other hand I would not put linux on a client of mine's desk at
this point. Closet, yes, desk, no (Linux is replacing some NT Unixware
servers). Mandrake
RIGHT ON! Fortunately for me, I report to a CEO who is at the same time
computer-challenged and industry-wise. I have begun moving Linux, NT out. He
is all for it, as long as it worksWHICH IT DOES!
Tim
Steve Philp wrote:
Christopher Cox wrote:
Yeah, I felt a little foolish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RIGHT ON! Fortunately for me, I report to a CEO who is at the same time
computer-challenged and industry-wise. I have begun moving Linux, NT out. He
is all for it, as long as it worksWHICH IT DOES!
I have the incredible luck of having a boss who tells me
friendy, but it seems allot less stable as well.
I have not had any stability problems. So far, I've seen a couple
of install-related issues, but they are minor.
As for Linux on the desktop, yes, I agree that more work needs to
be done.
The shell prompt must BE ABLE
:Try
:http://www.redhat.com
:
:Many organizations when they get their domain names get com,
:org and net, to prevent others from using too similiar a
:name. Check out whitehouse or nasa if you don't believe the
:problems not doing so can cause. grin
...
i know that, but redhat.org is running a
: Take a look at this:
:
: http://www.redhat.org
:
: ...hehehe, it took me a while to figure out what was going on.
:www.redhat.org resolves to 127.0.0.1. CLASSIC!
:
Hey, you are right on that one! Where does that come from? Certainly not
from my "hosts" file... A RH easter egg in a
Hi Ron,
You didn't look did you...:-)
www.redhat.org is a Microsoft Frontpage Personal Web Server ad.
Pretty low IMHO.
Regards
Christopher Cox
Ah.
Do I feel foolish. How did they do that!
it's not just in Linux that it resolves to 127.0.0.1, I tried it in
MSIE5.
Christopher Cox wrote:
Ah.
Do I feel foolish. How did they do that!
Why does http://www.redhat.org resolve to 127.0.0.1? I'm using Windurs 98 with IE.
Seve
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sevatio Octavio
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 1999 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] funny - www.redhat.org - Why Resolve to Localhost?
Why does http://www.redhat.org resolve to 127.0.0.1? I'm using
Windurs 98 with IE.
Seve
:Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server. I did check
:and it is not owned by RedHat at all.
:Most likely just someone that was wanting the domain for email only and
:wanted to play a joke on everyone else.
This is the best practical joke I have seen in the long time...
I
At 01:16 AM 11/14/99 +0100, Denis Havlik wrote:
:Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server. I did check
:and it is not owned by RedHat at all.
:Most likely just someone that was wanting the domain for email only and
:wanted to play a joke on everyone else.
This is the best
:Try
:http://www.redhat.com
:
:Many organizations when they get their domain names get com,
:org and net, to prevent others from using too similiar a
:name. Check out whitehouse or nasa if you don't believe the
:problems not doing so can cause. grin
...
i know that, but redhat.org is
Hi Ron,
You didn't look did you...:-)
www.redhat.org is a Microsoft Frontpage Personal Web Server ad.
Pretty low IMHO.
Regards
Christopher Cox
Hahahaha this is hilarious. Now we know who's actually
running Mandrake and who's running that "other" O.S.
Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server.
Oops, I wasn't thinking before when I said someone submitted it to
Internic with that address. They just configured their bind server that
way.
I guess it's time for a cup of coffee...
--Derek
I was not avare that one can put "private" IP - addresses in "public" DNS.
Actually the fact that 127.0.0.1 address gets resolved over "public" DNS
at all sounds completely weird to me. I have always thought
all the internet infrastructure ignores non-routable IP-addreses.
You're not
Take a look at this:
http://www.redhat.org
?:-O
Denis
---
Denis Havlik ||| http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
(@ @) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-oOO--(_)--OOo-
Try
http://www.redhat.com
Many organizations when they get their domain names get com,
org and net, to prevent others from using too similiar a
name. Check out whitehouse or nasa if you don't believe the
problems not doing so can cause. grin
We use the com for our customers, org for internal
Take a look at this:
http://www.redhat.org
...hehehe, it took me a while to figure out what was going on.
www.redhat.org resolves to 127.0.0.1. CLASSIC!
--Derek
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, you wrote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.redhat.org
?:-O
"Connection refused by server" :-(
John
47 matches
Mail list logo
