RE: [expert] Motherboards - again

2002-02-11 Thread Franki
Of Ric Tibbetts Sent: Monday, 11 February 2002 3:32 PM To: Mandrake Expert List Subject: [expert] Motherboards - again The recent discussions of motherboards has raised a question with me. There is always lots of chat about the mid to upper end mobos, but what about the lower end? If I were to put

Re: [expert] Motherboards - again

2002-02-11 Thread ed tharp
damn, just about any _old_ board, better if you can find one without onboard anything. On Monday 11 February 2002 02:32, you wrote: The recent discussions of motherboards has raised a question with me. There is always lots of chat about the mid to upper end mobos, but what about the lower

Re: [expert] Motherboards - again

2002-02-11 Thread Norman
Hi, I picked up your input to the motherboards thread and wondered how you got everything to work using your K7S5A board. I haven't got the plug and lead for the onboard video and bought an nvidia Geforce2 mx 200 card. this works but above 800x600 the display is bigger than the screen area. which

[expert] Motherboards - again

2002-02-10 Thread Ric Tibbetts
The recent discussions of motherboards has raised a question with me. There is always lots of chat about the mid to upper end mobos, but what about the lower end? If I were to put together a budget box, that could still run Linux, and be useable, what mobos would you experts recommend? This is

Re: [expert] motherboards

2001-12-13 Thread Tim Holmes
Looks like everybody has joined the 'bandwagon!' AMD is the way to go. They do as much, if not more then lower end P4s. They're also, in some cases 40% of the price. (Depending on speed of course!) I mean I bought 1.2 Ghz Athlon for like $120 I believe. That's with 266 FSB as well. I

Re: [expert] motherboards [OT]

2001-12-13 Thread Carroll Grigsby
Tim: Mandrake Forum ran a poll last week that showed that about 60% of those responding use some kind of AMD CPU; only about 35% use Intel (Macs and others accounted for the rest). Evidently Linuxers aren't impressed by those little blue critters in the Intel TV ads. -- cmg On Wednesday 12

RE: [expert] motherboards

2001-12-12 Thread Franki
]]On Behalf Of Lee Roberts Sent: Wednesday, 12 December 2001 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [expert] motherboards I'm shopping for a motherboard and CPU. At least a Pentium III and maybe I'll spend the bucks for a Pentium 4. I'll consider AMD also. Any recommendations? The more PCI slots

Re: [expert] motherboards

2001-12-12 Thread Lee Roberts
At 09:08 PM 12/11/2001 -0500, Neal Lippman wrote: 2. Athlon 1.4Ghz and up with MSI K7T266-Pro2, which supports DDR Ram. Although I haven't used the board myself, I've heard nothing but good things about it - this is what I would select if I were building a system today. 3. The new MSI

Re: [expert] motherboards

2001-12-11 Thread Hoyt Duff
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 08:49 pm, you wrote: I'm shopping for a motherboard and CPU. At least a Pentium III and maybe I'll spend the bucks for a Pentium 4. I'll consider AMD also. Any recommendations? The more PCI slots, the better. But, I want a board that's 100% Linux compatible - I

Re: [expert] motherboards

2001-12-11 Thread Jason Guidry
Lee Roberts wrote: I'm shopping for a motherboard and CPU. At least a Pentium III and maybe I'll spend the bucks for a Pentium 4. I'll consider AMD also. Any Someone can flame me for this, but all the benchmarks show the 1.2 athlons whooping P4s for half the price. call it the chipset or

Re: [expert] motherboards

2001-12-11 Thread Robert Goshko
I would have to agree, I have the Asus A7V133, with a 1.4GHz Athlon, and it cost almost half of what a comparable P4 would have. I stayed away from the A7V266, when I was looking in the summer time, the chipset was 1st generation and had some problems. The new Athlon XP's are the same form