Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2003 4:15 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:02:16 +0100
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
Is this just that it is reserved for the cellphone range, or does
it mean something more?
The 10.x.x.x range is reserved for internal addresses only, I
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:07 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:59:24 +0100
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > Yes, of course, I forgot that. So why, I wonder does this show as
> > what seems to be the first hop?
> >
> > Received: (from anydomain [10.2.131.4])
> >
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:59:24 +0100
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Yes, of course, I forgot that. So why, I wonder does this show as
> what seems to be the first hop?
>
> Received: (from anydomain [10.2.131.4])
> by rtc_srv_nt.kaluga.mts (NAVGW 2.5.1.13) with SMTP id
> M20030930185
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2003 4:35 pm, Andre Labbe wrote:
> Beware some softwares report the address in reverse order,
> 10.2.131.4 could be in effect 4.131.2.10 .
>
I guess we'll never know
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
Want to buy your Pa
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2003 4:51 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> So, this means that its the originating address in so far as it's
> the LAN Ip address of the machine the message came from. It would
> appear that they're not natting their Ip's as they leave the LAN
> bound for the internet. The more common o
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2003 4:15 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:02:16 +0100
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > Is this just that it is reserved for the cellphone range, or does
> > it mean something more?
>
> The 10.x.x.x range is reserved for internal addresses only, IIRC.
Anne Wilson wrote:
Going back through some of my old posts, I came upon the thread where
I tried to find out why kmail's pop filter didn't work on them.
Bryan suggested that maybe the originator was not the .ru name that
we saw. Looking again at the headers the originator appears to be
anydom
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 11:02 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Going back through some of my old posts, I came upon the thread where
> I tried to find out why kmail's pop filter didn't work on them.
> Bryan suggested that maybe the originator was not the .ru name that
> we saw. Looking again at the h
Beware some softwares report the address in reverse order, 10.2.131.4 could
be in effect 4.131.2.10 .
Andre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anne Wilson
Sent: 30 September 2003 16:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] Those sms messages
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:02:16 +0100
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Is this just that it is reserved for the cellphone range, or does it
> mean something more?
The 10.x.x.x range is reserved for internal addresses only, IIRC.
It's not a valid internet address, kinda like 192.x.x.x
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
