Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Malinak
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] WinXP and SAMBA
Sorry that should have been from 1 to 0 !
Samba does not have the signature needed
]]
|Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:57 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [expert] WinXP and SAMBA
|
|
|Sorry that should have been from 1 to 0 !
|Samba does not have the signature needed for logons.
|This was found on the Samba Mailing list.
|Michael
|- Original Message
It's more likely that M$ altered samba on XP (again) and you will have to
wait for the SAMBA crew to reverse engineer a fix. Alternatively, but I am
not sure personally, but if you installed/have the home variant of the XP
virus, I believe it is crippled in many (network and server) ways and
From the Samba.org site:
Samba 2.2.0 + Win2K SP 2 or WinXP
With Service Pack 2 Microsoft have added some new
RPC calls and uses them to join the domain, the same
RPC calls are found on Windows XP Beta release.
Samba 2.2.0 does not have this new set of RPC calls
and this make problems to
Yes, also keep in mind that XP home does NOT support domain based networks,
and its support of peer sharing is limited to 5 PC networks...
I had it sort of working with 2000 SP2, but that was a snapshot version of
samba..
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eh, I'm not having ANY trouble with Samba vis-a-vis XP.
Note: XP does not seem to be able to perform Domain Logins, into a Linux
Samba server, but if XP is set to use Workgroup mode, it works fine.
It also does require encrypted passwords which may be complicating
matters...
But I'm regularly
