Re: [expert] Netscape 474 and CPU

2000-08-03 Thread Ellick Chan
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, simon wrote: > Has anyone noticed how netscape 474 gradually consumes cpu usage to 100 > percent over 12 to 18 hours? > Netscape does that occassionally, I personally use "Links" and "Lynx" more often, as they crash less. You can "limit" the amount of CPU/mem Netscape takes w

Re: [expert] Netscape 474 and CPU

2000-08-03 Thread David Talbot
On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Has anyone noticed how netscape 474 gradually consumes cpu usage to 100 > percent over 12 to 18 hours? > > simon You'll find the same problem in 4.73 too... Netscape on Linux has/does have a number of bugs that make it *REAL* bad to leave running. If you view a

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-25 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:52:56AM -0400, Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote: > I have them both installed, and SO will > NOT find either one, even if I point to it Well, that's the way it worked for me at least. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com Sichere Mail? Ma

RE: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-25 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS
I have them both installed, and SO will NOT find either one, even if I point to it -Original Message- From: Alexander Skwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474 On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:16:26PM -0400

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-25 Thread Fran Parker
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:57 PM > Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474 > > > > It is free for the registering at the sun site...version 5.2 > > not in B

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread maiplace
- Original Message - From: "Fran Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474 > It is free for the reg

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Fran Parker
It is free for the registering at the sun site...version 5.2 not in Beta anymore. Bambi On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Greg Stewart wrote: > Try the SUN website, although I think it's a development package and is not free. > > Check freshmeat.net to see if there are any free Java engines (i have no idea-

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Greg Stewart
Try the SUN website, although I think it's a development package and is not free. Check freshmeat.net to see if there are any free Java engines (i have no idea--i don't use it). --Greg > I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA > installed. What package would I install t

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 08:16:22PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote: > Did they fix the java problem in 4.74, or does it still runaway with the > CPU now and then like 4.73 does? What about Netscape 4.74? Will it be included in the standard distribution, or will the users have to download it from the cr

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 07:15:46PM -0500, Ellick Chan wrote: > I found a quick cheap way to avoid Netscape, try using lynx, or "links", > an improved lynx. If you do the file associations in links, you can even > view the jpegs and gifs on web pages. Try out w3m. It really kicks lynx! Alexander

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:26:56AM -0500, Rob Benson wrote: > I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA > installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've > done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it > wants. Got a package name an

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:16:26PM -0400, Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote: > If you find out let me know, > During the install, I pointed it to my > IBM Java, and it wont see it! Oh well You need the JDK 1.1.8, not the JRE and not a newer version. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Sarang Lakare
go to www.sun.com and download JAVA SDK1.2.2.. thast the latest they have for linux. -sarang

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA > installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've > done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it > wants. Got a package name and a download URL? > The JRE

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Charles A Edwards
- Original Message - From: "Rob Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA > installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've > done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it > wants. Got a packa

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 24-Jul-00 by Rob Benson: > I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA > installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've > done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it > wants. Got a package name and a download URL? > Thank

RE: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS
If you find out let me know, During the install, I pointed it to my IBM Java, and it wont see it! Oh well -Original Message- From: Rob Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474 I use Staroffice, but

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Rob Benson
I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it wants. Got a package name and a download URL? Thanks, Rob Benson Ken Thompson wrote: > > On Sun

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-24 Thread Ken Thompson
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why > anyone would expect anything better. Personally, I still like version 3.04 > best. I run it with Java disabled; use its old emailer and scripting turned > off. Since I rarely accept attach

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-23 Thread Sevatio Octavio
Seve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 7/23/00, 3:23:08 PM, Pj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: [expert] netscape 474: > Considering this browser's sad history the pas

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-23 Thread Fran Parker
Forgive me if this is repeated...I have had to re-write it three times, then kill KMail because it was stuck and wouldn't send. I wouldn't look for StarOffice to be the Netscrappy browser/email salvation. It is the most hoggy, bloated and beautiful suite ever. You must load their desktop suite..

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-23 Thread Ellick Chan
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Pj wrote: > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 17:23:08 -0500 > From: Pj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474 > > Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do no

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-23 Thread Pj
Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why anyone would expect anything better. Personally, I still like version 3.04 best. I run it with Java disabled; use its old emailer and scripting turned off. Since I rarely accept attachments, I've effectively eliminated most

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-23 Thread Mark Weaver
I wouldn't become too hopeful cause the beta release of Netscape 6 is doing the same thing. In SPADES. It's worse there than in the .7x series of Netscape 4. -- Mark ** Registered Linux user # 182496 ** On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, dallard wrote: > Mark > > I installed net

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-21 Thread dallard
Mark I installed netscape 4.74 on my mandrake 7.0 machine yesterday. It seems to have the same problems that 4.70 had (my previous version). Netscape crashes on certain java pages and sometimes takes up al l the cpu. same as before. Oh well mabe next patch. :0) Hope that helps Dany

Re: [expert] netscape 474

2000-07-20 Thread Mark Weaver
Did they fix the java problem in 4.74, or does it still runaway with the CPU now and then like 4.73 does? -- Mark ** Registered Linux user # 182496 ** On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, victor gvirtsman wrote: > found it today at ftp.netscape.com > >