On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why
> anyone would expect anything better. Personally, I still like version 3.04
> best. I run it with Java disabled; use its old emailer and scripting turned
> off. Since I rarely accept attachments, I've effectively eliminated most of
> the virus attacks.
>
> Actually I'd be delighted to buy a real Linux browser that wasn't bloated
> and that offered mail. Does anyone know how well the STAR OFFICE browser
> and emailer work in Linux? It worked okay in Winbloz.
It works pretty good if you have JAVA installed, I'm using version 5.2 now.
>
> Pj
>
> At 05:42 PM 7/23/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >I wouldn't become too hopeful cause the beta release of Netscape 6 is
> >doing the same thing. In SPADES. It's worse there than in the .7x series
> >of Netscape 4.
> >
> >--
> >Mark
> >
> > ** Registered Linux user # 182496 **
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, dallard wrote:
> >
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> I installed netscape 4.74 on my mandrake 7.0 machine yesterday. It
> >> seems to have the same problems that 4.70 had (my previous version).
> >> Netscape crashes on certain java pages and sometimes takes up al l the cpu.
> >> same as before. Oh well mabe next patch. :0)
> >>
> >> Hope that helps
> >>
> >> Dany Allard
> >>
> >> Mark Weaver wrote:
> >>
> >> > Did they fix the java problem in 4.74, or does it still runaway with the
> >> > CPU now and then like 4.73 does?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Mark
> >> >
> >> > ** Registered Linux user # 182496 **
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, victor gvirtsman wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > found it today at ftp.netscape.com
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
--
Ken Thompson
Electrocom Computer Services
1801 Wayne Dr.
Payette, Idaho 83661
Ph. (208) 642-7101 (888) 642-7101
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nwaa.com
Computer Sales - Service and Repair
Internet Web Site Design
