Very nice poem. I'll give it some thought. Thanks Angela.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Curtis,
> here's a poem I translated from the Chinese into something kind of
like blues. Would it be something you could do music for?
>
> The B
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Michelle Obama in Fairfiled, IA
>
> (yep, a heavy night out recently leaves me in piggy heaven on the tube
> tonight)
>
> If it were not for Ron Paul, Obama would be my vote.
>
> Let those rednecks here on F
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, Angela, let's start by clearing up the errors
in your introduction:
> Someone refresh my memory if I'm wrong, but I believe Judy said
> that my interpretation of the ghost's instructions to Hamlet was
> "a gro
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dr. Peter Sutphen wrote:
> > Don't listen to that whore of Babylon called Sal.
> >
> For God's sake, Doctor, at least wait until your
> patients have left your office before you go online
> to YourFace with comments about their private sex
Hey Curtis,
here's a poem I translated from the Chinese into something kind of like blues.
Would it be something you could do music for?
The Blue Crane Blues
The man
That flew the blue crane away
Stopped here.
This here be the empty crib
They put together
For the old crane.
Explains how the mayor of VC can offer bribes to elected Jefferson
County supervisors evidently quite confident he could channel bribe
money. Asking that they go along with VC overlooking regulation or to
let slide some things. Offering to make contributions to a charity
of choice to one or to
If you saw the documentary "Ring of Fire" by the Blair brothers,
you're already familiar with "Dynamo Jack" the guy who could run chi
through his patients and start fire using chi. Here's a more recent
video of him:
http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=Aos0hnwiHt8
Michelle Obama in Fairfiled, IA
(yep, a heavy night out recently leaves me in piggy heaven on the tube
tonight)
If it were not for Ron Paul, Obama would be my vote.
Let those rednecks here on FFL please take note of that point, so that
I don't have to repeat again.
OffWorldfor Ron Paul !
Emily Dickinson:
564
My period had come for Prayer--
No other Art--would do--
My Tactics missed a rudiment--
Creator--Was it you?
God grows above--so those who pray
Horizons --must ascend--
And so I stepped upon the North
To see this Curious Friend--
His house was not--no sign had He--
By Chimne
. . .from Edna St. Vincent Millay:
Renascence
ALL I could see from where I stood
Was three long mountains and a wood;
I turned and looked the other way,
And saw three islands in a bay.
So with my eyes I traced the line
Of the horizon, thin and fine,
Straigh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> , and their
> > judgment. We cannot prove satori exists without trusting those
> > who claim to have reached satori
>
> Wait, not just claim to have reached; have been
> validated by their communities to have re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" tertonzeno@ wrote:
> >
> > high on??
> >
> > http://www.highestbuddhistmasters.org/english/enyingma.html
>
> A good test of how "high" any of them are
> might be t
Marek, Angela, and Authfriend are enlightened souls.
(Unlike the anti-science fundies like Turq, Vaj, Boo, bhairatu,
Peter, NewMorning etc.)
Welcome - Angela, Marek, and Authfriend - to the beautiful future of
honest scientific method. Thanks for making your truthful voices
heard above the ca
OK, Judy, I've got unexpected time on my hands, so let's
have a little chat about Hamlet and Oedipus with references to the Gita as well
as a philosophical background we could call Vedic, but I shall insist that
that's too narrow. It is for sure philosophical monism, but it occurs
everywhere on
http://www.nasa.gov/externalflash/Mars_as_art/index_noaccess.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
>
> > So you think it's a religious practice even if
> > you never end up waving candles to Shiva or
> > Mother Divine?
> >
> > Don't be ridiculo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, but that's where the "community of the adequate"
> > comes in, the people who have followed the injunction
> > and apprehended the data (or Datum, in the case of
> > satori). To complete the process, yo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
>
> > So you think it's a religious practice even if
> > you never end up waving candles to Shiva or
> > Mother Divine?
> >
> > Don't be ridiculo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > So you think it's a religious practice even if
> > you never end up waving candles to Shiva or
> > Mother Divine?
> >
> > Don't be ridiculous.
>
> Yes, but that's where the "community of the adequate"
> comes in, the people who have followed the injunction
> and apprehended the data (or Datum, in the case of
> satori). To complete the process, you have to check
> your apprehension against theirs. The "community of
> the adequate" has alrea
TurquoiseB wrote:
> Vaj and Bhairitu have their theories about the
> TM technique itself being the cause of some of
> the dissociation one tends to see in long-term
> TM teachers. Me, I think it's just the cognitive
> dissonance of having been taught to believe one
> set of things and teach anoth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you think it's a religious practice even if
> you never end up waving candles to Shiva or
> Mother Divine?
>
> Don't be ridiculous.
I am taking a risk as a new person here in joining this discussion
because clea
Physicality is destiny, so changing one's normal operations is
changing one's future. What you put your attention on grows and vice
versa -- attenuation. Use it or lose it...including evil tendencies
left begging for one's awareness. Mood making is hard to sustain
unless it's done "just right,"
Dr. Peter Sutphen wrote:
> Don't listen to that whore of Babylon called Sal.
>
For God's sake, Doctor, at least wait until your
patients have left your office before you go online
to YourFace with comments about their private sex
life!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > You're not supposed to bias their decision making process by
> > suggesting what the experience should be.
>
> It was my comment and yes, it did not come
Don't listen to that whore of Babylon called Sal.
--- Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:09 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela
> Mailander
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm relatively new here as well, Ruth, and I was
--- ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Yeah that's one of the main problems with
> double-blinding in
> > meditation research is that the degree of casual
> knowledge of
> > meditation, esp. in pe
On Dec 22, 2007, at 4:34 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:02 AM, mainstream20016 wrote:
>
> > Agreed. In 1974, the year I learned TM, the idea that TM was a
> > Scientifically researched
> > meditati
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yeah that's one of the main problems with double-blinding in
> meditation research is that the degree of casual knowledge of
> meditation, esp. in people volunteering for such a study, is such that
> it's next to im
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That, and making black holes that will consume the entire earth in a
> fraction of a second.
>
> I'm just sayin'.
>
> Actually, these types of black holes are possibly formed just from
our
> constant bombardment of co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Uses third tier science journal articles to establish "PROOF" of
> > > something, >>
> >
> > NewMorning just made the list of anti-science bots.
> >
> > Above he uses 1, 2, and 5 below:
> >
> > 1. Attack the pers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, the *use* of the science has, IMO,
> been a lie from Day One. It was seen as a
> sales tool, and more than a sales tool, because
> it enabled Maharishi to hide what he really
> believes (things like dicksicles
We're impressed with your scholarly reply on this matter. I believe
your thoughts address the point that I'm trying to convey.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John wrote:
> > Krishna and Balrama did not fight.
> >
> According to Jean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The movie got a pretty good reception when it came
> out in 1986. Anybody here seen it?
>
> Snippet of Johnson's own "Crossroads":
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Crossroads.ogg
I saw it, just Hollywood mood
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I figured in this forum, I could just state the interpretation in
outline form. I have published on this (in a peer reviewed journal),
and in that essay, I spelled things out much more fully with
references e
I certainly agree about the lying and the hypocrisy being outrageous and out of
place in a "spiritual" context. I also do not like the religious turn things
took. I kept my distance from all of that.
I was talking about the science only. I am not aware of any studies that
compare TM and o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:02 AM, mainstream20016 wrote:
>
> > Agreed. In 1974, the year I learned TM, the idea that TM was a
> > Scientifically researched
> > meditation technique was a key factor in agreeing to learn T
John wrote:
> Krishna and Balrama did not fight.
>
According to Jean Varenne, in his book entitled
'Yoga' there are three Krishnas in Indian mythology:
The baby Krishna, son of Vasudeva and Devaki;
the Krishna of Brindaban, the lover of Radha;
and the Krishna of the Bhagavad Gita.
The myth of K
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Angela Mailander wrote:
o you think Judy is right, that it isn't such a black and white
affair? That seems a reasonable assumption, though I haven't seen
all of the extant research on TM, and what I have seen is flimsy,
but is all of it bad? I agree that the ic
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
At a village I visited near Varanasi there was a woman who discovered
the face of Kali in the trunk of a tree. I looked and could see
how one
might be able to make out such an image from the squiggles but I might
have also been able to make out th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Krishna and Balrama did not fight. His clan became drunk
and started fighting and killing each other.
>
> Balrama went into the state of yogam and vanished instantly.
>
> Krishna w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Maharishi says with no effort is lost the yogi attains his
goal.!!
>
> Wealth can be created effortlessly.
Maharishi is presenting an alternative to human beings which is not
appreciated by p
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you think Judy is right, that it isn't such a black
> and white affair?
The science, or the lying and the hypocrisy?
I have no problem with some of the science
being valid; a few studies may even someday
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brilliant. Thanks for that link Curtis. It just went on my Christmas
> list! Although I don't demand high audio quality from old recordings
> from the 20s and 30s, having a clear recording like that does make a
> world
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > > That's fascinating, Curtis. I don't think many
> > > singing teachers deal with this sort of thing,
> > > do they? It almost sounds as thou
On Dec 22, 2007, at 5:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Looking at an icicle and imagining it to be the
dick of a god and created supernaturally.
But you don't understand Turq! His dick is like an supernatural
icicle, so it's just the Self admiring the Self!
(I'm not really sure if that actually
TurquoiseB wrote:
> True, as has happened in the past, the trailers
> may contain the *only* interesting scenes in the
> movie, but these appear watchable
>
Saw some of those the other day when I saw "I Am Legend" which is worth
a watch though the "director's cut" may be better as it felt a l
That, and making black holes that will consume the entire earth in a
fraction of a second.
I'm just sayin'.
Actually, these types of black holes are possibly formed just from our
constant bombardment of cosmic rays that come at our atmosphere at far
higher speeds than those speeds that our best E
Do you think Judy is right, that it isn't such a black and white affair? That
seems a reasonable assumption, though I haven't seen all of the extant research
on TM, and what I have seen is flimsy, but is all of it bad? I agree that the
ice dick is ludicrous.
- Original Message
From:
TurquoiseB wrote:
> Looking at an icicle and imagining it to be the
> dick of a god and created supernaturally.
>
> THAT is the movement Off is trying to convince
> us is scientific.
>
And in India people believe that a certain stream runs red with blood
from Kali. Turns out the stream was ru
> > did the Buena Vista Social club project in Cuba, did you see that?
>
> Nope. The documentary about it is on my Netflix
> list, though.
You will love it I think and you get a great feeling for what an
amazing human Ry is.
>
> > My favorite work he did is with my favorite guitarist from Mali
Yup, we shall indeed leave it at that.
- Original Message
From: authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 1:05:57 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: blame it on Star Trek
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroup
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:34 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
People are prone to justification.
For example, if a person is charged $5000 to learn meditation, with so
much skin in the game the practitioner may justify that cost by
developing a belief in good effects.
Wonderful example. You'll find tha
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:23 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:40 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
>
> > None of which was published in a respected peer-reviewed journal.
> > Don't fall into Vaj's attempt to make up peer-reviewed science.
>
>
> Actually it appeared in one of the most
At long last, an honest blogger:
http://www.holyjuan.com/2007/05/10-attributes-of-really-lazy-people.html
ruthsimplicity wrote:
> So, rules of the game. I assume they are as set forth in the posting
> guidelines and that
> all people are to be treated the same and no one has special privileges.
> Who are the
> moderators? How much is this forum moderated? It seems that it is
> pretty free wheeling,
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:04 AM, new.morning wrote:
Your posts brings up a good point, IMO -- the criteria of fanatics:
1) Make repeated arguments with irrelevant support.
2) Assume and practice that anything repeated often and passionately
enough may stick on the wall and in feeble minds.
3) Act
I acclimate quickly.
- Original Message
From: Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 12:46:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lay of the land
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:09 PM, authfriend wrote:
curtisdeltablues wrote:
>> That's fascinating, Curtis. I don't think many
>> singing teachers deal with this sort of thing,
>> do they? It almost sounds as though she's as much
>> an acting teacher as a singing teacher.
>>
>
> The amazing thing about her is that she doesn't just take the usual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I believe that's just the blog writers comments. IIRC, that example
> does not appear in the video.
>
> The jelly donut idea has more to do with confirmation of your
> experience to a 'community of the experienced'
On Dec 22, 2007, at 1:20 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
What do you do?
(apart from being an anti-science freak that wants to join Ted
Haggard and Bill O'reilly and take us back to the dark ages.)
L:
That usually keeps me pretty busy.
LOL. Well it looks like somebody finally pulled the plu
If the graviton turns out not to exist, it will render all work based
on quantized macroscopic physics flawed, and destroy virtually all the
accepted notions of a unified theory of physics since the 1970s,
including string theory, superstring theory, M-theory, loop quantum
gravity, and quantum gra
off_world_beings wrote:
The anti science crowd are going crazy.Truth hurts eh Lurk? I
work on a computer Fundieboy...a lot.
About once every hour I get distracted from working, and go "Anti-
Science Freak Bashing" instead.
L:
Sure it's not the other way around?
Off:
Yes, I go skiin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Fantastic.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
>
> > I just bought a new remaster of all Robert Johnson songs that just
> > came out from a classical music guy who is using n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, it is a weak response, I'm afraid. But there is no way I can
educate you in this matter. 1) Your assessment of my comments are so
full of errors and unwarranted assumptions, I don't know where to
begin.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > After Nabby posted the URL to the Ry Cooder "Paris,
> > Texas" video, I went looking for solo Cooder videos,
> > because I haven't heard much o
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:39 AM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
So, rules of the game. I assume they are as set forth in the
posting guidelines and that
all people are to be treated the same and no one has special
privileges. Who are the
moderators? How much is this forum moderated? It seems that it i
Brilliant. Thanks for that link Curtis. It just went on my Christmas
list! Although I don't demand high audio quality from old recordings
from the 20s and 30s, having a clear recording like that does make a
world of difference--almost let's you feel like you're there 70 years ago!
Fantastic.
---
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:09 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm relatively new here as well, Ruth, and I was pretty shocked at
the utter and uncivilized rudeness I saw going on, but you get used to
it.
Angela, I totally u
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not to get in the way of this dick-waving contest"
>
> That does sound dangerous!
Not to mention potentially hilarious. There
was a not-terribly-good Blake Edwards film
in the 80s called "Skin Deep," which
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Sal, this (below) provoked a huge belly-laugh! Very fine.
Thanks, Marek. :)
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not to get in the way of this dick-waving contest"
>
> That does sound dangerous! Off is taking some heat because of the
> bombastic way he is presenting himself. Claiming that if we don't
> parrot a certa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's fascinating, Curtis. I don't think many
> > singing teachers deal with this sort of thing,
> > do they? It almost sounds as though she's as much
> > an acting teacher as a singing teacher.
>
> The ama
> Not to get in the way of this dick-waving contest"
That does sound dangerous! Off is taking some heat because of the
bombastic way he is presenting himself. Claiming that if we don't
parrot a certain phrase of his makes us "anti-science" is what got
my...er...my...well... my ire up.
--- In F
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm relatively new here as well, Ruth, and I was pretty shocked at
the utter and uncivilized rudeness I saw going on, but you get used to
it.
> Judy will attack your spelling errors
Only if you make a big de
> That's fascinating, Curtis. I don't think many
> singing teachers deal with this sort of thing,
> do they? It almost sounds as though she's as much
> an acting teacher as a singing teacher.
The amazing thing about her is that she doesn't just take the usual
classical position that I am singing a
I'm relatively new here as well, Ruth, and I was pretty shocked at the utter
and uncivilized rudeness I saw going on, but you get used to it.
Judy will attack your spelling errors, and Richard will attack you if you're
not a gung-ho advocate of "my country right or wrong." You've seen Off's
t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > Just because something is presented in a journal does not make
> > > it true.
> >
> >
TurquoiseB wrote:
> I particularly like the shot of you with Paul
> Rubens and the one of Bryan Fuller with his
> new bowling ball. And, even given the long
> working days, I think that the fact that there
> *was* a "bowling party" answers my question. :-)
>
Imagine an FFL "bowling party." :D
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An apple a day. Word on the street is that TMmovement money is
tight
> for support of the vedic pujaris. Tight enough that the commissary
> is cutting back the rations of their food. If the poor Indians who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After Nabby posted the URL to the Ry Cooder "Paris,
> Texas" video, I went looking for solo Cooder videos,
> because I haven't heard much of his work but have
> loved what I've heard.
Turq is more of a Ry expert, but
Great comments, Turq. I had a Blake prof once who said to me in class: "I will
personally see to it that you never publish anything on Blake." He was a
little pissed because I told him that his analysis of an inventory he'd
constructed of pictorial objects in Blake's illustrations constituted
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> And welcome! Glad you joined us.
>
Thank you for the welcome. And here I started a whole new thread
because of the prior post on thread rules! I kind of figured out what
you are saying, but one never knows unt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I am working with a classically trained singing teacher who
> is helping me understand all the different ways I can bring or
> withdraw my awareness and emotion while I am performing. I have
> always been
I started posting here yesterday after about a week of lurking to get
the lay of the land.
I follow directions, mostly, so I read the posting rules and acronyms.
This morning the following was posted (in the lovely color of fuchsia).
My questions and comments are in black type.
Ruth wrote:
> Ma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:40 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
> >
> > > None of which was published in a respected peer-reviewed
> > > journal. Don't fall into
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ruth wrote:
> > May I ask, what is the posting format here?
Ruth, Willytex (Richard J. Williams) is this forum's
very own troll. Don't pay any mind to what he says in
his reply to you; he's just making it
After Nabby posted the URL to the Ry Cooder "Paris,
Texas" video, I went looking for solo Cooder videos,
because I haven't heard much of his work but have
loved what I've heard.
Apparently there were quite a few such up until quite
recently, when the copyright holder demanded they be
taken down. N
Sal, this (below) provoked a huge belly-laugh! Very fine.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 9:27 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
>
> > Unbelievable, this will go down as a record of anti-science behavior.
> > I should collect t
Ruth wrote:
> > May I ask, what is the posting format here?
> > Do people typically have what they are quoting
> > from a prior post at the bottom or top of their
> > post? Or does it matter?
> >
Alex Stanley wrote:
> It's a matter of personal preference and the software
> being used. People c
Ruth wrote:
> May I ask, what is the posting format here?
>
It's best, Ruth, to be a top-poster and to include
the line you're responding to. That way, respondents
don't have to scroll all the way to the bottom of
the messages just to read a silly, one-liner sentence.
It best also, not to chang
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:40 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
>
> > None of which was published in a respected peer-reviewed journal.
> > Don't fall into Vaj's attempt to make up peer-reviewed science.
>
>
> Actually it appeared
No, those dogs were killed. The surgery didn't kill them, but they were
radio-active, and you couldn't let radio-active dogs run around. I was in my
teens back then, and got to assist my mom who was doing the surgeries. I was
told that this was all for the greater good, but to me the good wasn
Yes, it is a weak response, I'm afraid. But there is no way I can educate you
in this matter. 1) Your assessment of my comments are so full of errors and
unwarranted assumptions, I don't know where to begin. 2) I cannot educate you
on these matters since a) you would not submit to learn from
On Dec 22, 2007, at 10:40 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
None of which was published in a respected peer-reviewed journal.
Don't fall into Vaj's attempt to make up peer-reviewed science.
Actually it appeared in one of the most respected texts available and
an important touchstone for modern n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
> > wrote:
> > > 1. Attack the person not the argument.
> > > 2. Attack the concept of s
Thank you, Angela, I can sign on to this statement since it's not a prediction.
Marek
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Well, Off, since it's Christmas, I'll go this far:
> I fucking hope the 21st century will be about research published in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When it comes to philosophy of language, the literary theories
> that grow out of that, and the various critical approaches that
> grow out of literary theories, I do believe you're out of your
> depths, Judy.
On Dec 22, 2007, at 9:58 AM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
Interesting, fun and fraught with danger! For example, you tell
30 people to meditate (injunction). You tell them that some people
who meditate experience thoughts of a jelly donut. (another
injunction). You ask each one what they ex
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
**snip**
> Yes, & judging against even the TMmovement peer-review research as
> evidence, the names of every raja could easily be woven into their
> indictments on crimes against humanity. Cl
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
