Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama supports civilian paramilitary, FFL Obama-bots get suckered.

2008-11-02 Thread Vaj
On Nov 2, 2008, at 11:26 AM, shempmcgurk wrote: > In the thread I started titled "a well regulated militia", I suggested > that there be "a civilian paramilitary that is just as strong as the > regular military" and asked: "Doesn't that sound like a good idea?" > > The Obama-bots all chimed in to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama supports civilian paramilitary, FFL Obama-bots get suckered.

2008-11-02 Thread Peter
What a dumb half-nigger he is! Snicker snicker.. --- On Sun, 11/2/08, shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama supports civilian paramilitary, FFL Obama-bots > get suckered. > To: FairfieldLif

[FairfieldLife] Obama supports civilian paramilitary, FFL Obama-bots get suckered.

2008-11-02 Thread shempmcgurk
In the thread I started titled "a well regulated militia", I suggested that there be "a civilian paramilitary that is just as strong as the regular military" and asked: "Doesn't that sound like a good idea?" The Obama-bots all chimed in to snicker and say how they're all opposed: Rick, Bob, Gul