--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "TurquoiseB" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> wrote:
> >
> > I guess it boils down to that most curious trait that makes people
> > in the TMO (and perhaps other groups) ascribe enlightenment to
> > people simply because they
list, it seems to contradict itself viz a viz loss of interest in
judging others.
Thank you for this. I enjoyed reading and replying.
From: salyavin808
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 4:34 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
Doc sez: good point. I run in different circles than you do, finding those who
follow teachers, ascribe the teacher's enlightenment (is that a loaded word, or
what?), to the teacher's charismatic personality. Anyone can string sentences
together to sound plausible - even you, and I mean that in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
wrote:
>
> I guess it boils down to that most curious trait that makes people
> in the TMO (and perhaps other groups) ascribe enlightenment to
> people simply because they like them.
What I find even more curious is the number of people who
ascr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
> So Xeno writes the other day to Judy:
>
> "I feel Barry is more spiritually advanced than Robin"
>
> This alone made my head spin. But just, for example, take a look at Robin's
> commentary to Emily after she took his quiz yesterd
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:57 PM, raunchydog wrote:
> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn
> wrote:
> >
> > I found that an interesting statement, to say the least. Â Here is a
> snip to Judy from Xeno that partially addressed the statement. Â Have a
> good one.
>
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
> I found that an interesting statement, to say the least. Â Here is a snip to
> Judy from Xeno that partially addressed the statement. Â Have a good one.
>
> "And how did you do on the test Judy? In his absence I gave Barry 100% by
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
> So Xeno writes the other day to Judy:
>
> "I feel Barry is more spiritually advanced than Robin"
>
> This alone made my head spin. But just, for example, take a look at Robin's
> commentary to Emily after she took his quiz yesterd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>
> nablusoss1008:
> > What is the lady doing in this picture ?
> >
> Well, it looks like she is meditating in the
> yoga pose, sort of like SBS used to do.
>
> > > 'Mind/Body Therapy Improves Wellness'
> > > http://www.mageremp
nablusoss1008:
> What is the lady doing in this picture ?
>
Well, it looks like she is meditating in the
yoga pose, sort of like SBS used to do.
> > 'Mind/Body Therapy Improves Wellness'
> > http://www.magerempowerment.com/v2/blog/?p=313
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
wrote:
>
> "Mind-body medicine recognises our thoughts play a significant role in
> establishing and restoring our health. Such a thought-body link-up has
> been widely explored and documented by scientific researchers, most
> notably t
Sounds good :-), my original comments were in a completely different context.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> H... To me it is "self evident."
>
>
> Let's try a different tack:
>
> what is turiya? The unifying basis of waking, dreaming and sleeping.
>
> What is
If that's what he means - perfect !!!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
>
> * * Thomas appears to be speaking of "Brahman", where the apparent separation
> of all opposites (Inner and Outer, Absolute and Relative, Purusha and
> Prakriti, etc.) is finally resolved into the
H... To me it is "self evident."
Let's try a different tack:
what is turiya? The unifying basis of waking, dreaming and sleeping.
What is unity? Where turiya is realized as the basis of waking, dreaming and
sleeping at all possible levels of activity.
What is the inner, what is he outer?
* * Thomas appears to be speaking of "Brahman", where the apparent separation
of all opposites (Inner and Outer, Absolute and Relative, Purusha and Prakriti,
etc.) is finally resolved into the utter perfection of "That Alone IS" -- where
Wholeness predominates everywhere and everywhen, and the p
I have no clue what he's saying. May be that inner should reflect an outer
morality?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> ???
> ""When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the
> outside and the outside like the inside... then you will have entered t
???
""When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the
outside and the outside like the inside... then you will have entered the
Kingdom of Heaven." -Gospel of Saint Thomas
Sounds like separation to me (not).
L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" wrote:
>
>
All of these mind-modeling insights are great, Bob.
But I shall limit myself to replying to only one.
> 3. Function follows form. Contrary to everything
> I was taught as a child, I learned from M&K
> that what I say is so much less important than
> how I say it. That the silver tongued devil alw
kingI
learned many of these same lessons the very hard way through years in
corporate america. Â And they hold true today.
>
> --- On Wed, 8/17/11, Ravi Yogi raviyogi@... wrote:
>
> From: Ravi Yogi raviyogi@...
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Mind-Modeling
> To: FairfieldLife@y
Sounds to me like many of these lessons were learned from workingI learned
many of these same lessons the very hard way through years in corporate
america. And they hold true today.
--- On Wed, 8/17/11, Ravi Yogi wrote:
From: Ravi Yogi
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Mind-Modeling
To
The basic principle of spirituality is to separate the outer from inner,
there's nothing to be learned from the personality of a Guru. So clearly
both of you failed here.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price wrote:
>
> Excellent topic.Â
>
> Some mind-modeling I may have done with Mahari
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "It's just a ride"
wrote:
>
> Came across a word today while discussing a new HIV Phase I trial.
> When the question of who would volunteer for the clinical trials
> arose, someone volunteered the bugchasers. No, these aren't kids
> who chase after fireflies
Hey, this guy looks like Rick's brother in law.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/fashion/13psych.html
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John M. Knapp, LMSW"
> wrote:
> >
> > In cognitive therapy attributing thoughts, feelings, and motives to
> > others is called "mind reading." It's considered a "cognitive
> > d
Perfect Madness: From Awakening to
Enlightenment by Donna Lee Gorrell (daughter of THE famous jazz
musician of the same middle name)
I was naive when my spiritual journey began, I wanted growth without
change, wisdom without experience, security without sacrifice, and
life without death. I wanted
like Amma says:
"anyone who has a mind/ego is mad/insane because the mind/ego is
madness/insanity"
that's the nature of the egoic mind !
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Angela,
>
> I think "Laws of Form" and "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > In an article in the NY Times magazine today
> > > about the growing role that neu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > In an article in the NY Times magazine today
> > about the growing role that neuroscience is
> > playing in law, Stephen J. Morse, professor
> > of law a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In an article in the NY Times magazine today
> about the growing role that neuroscience is
> playing in law, Stephen J. Morse, professor
> of law and psychiatry at the University of
> Pennsylvania, is quoted as sayin
--Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot
> > slpeling was
> > > ipmorantt!
>
Well...hmmm "enough" [~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "larry.potter"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > O lny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
> > >
> > >
> > > I cdnuolt blv
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "larry.potter"
> wrote:
> >
> > O lny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
> >
> >
> > I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
> rdanieg.
> > The phaonmneal pw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "larry.potter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> O lny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
>
>
> I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
rdanieg.
> The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch
at
> Cmabrigde Uinervtisy,
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Is there any connection between Devil-worshippers and the
cult Klu-Klux-Klan.??
>
> Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:43:47 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] 'Mind War by Va
I have no idea.On May 8, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Jason Spock wrote: Is there any connection between Devil-worshippers and the cult Klu-Klux-Klan.??
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Is there any connection between Devil-worshippers and the cult Klu-Klux-Klan.??Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:43:47 -0400Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] 'Mind War by Valley/Aquino- How We Got Brainwashed on Iraq' Is this by the famous Satanist Michael Aquino, fo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 2/21/06 11:32 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > That's my impression too. The point isn't to absorb
> > the teacher's qualities of *mind* but his/her qualities
> > of *consciousness*.
>
> Yet wh
on 2/21/06 11:32 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> That's my impression too. The point isn't to absorb
> the teacher's qualities of *mind* but his/her qualities
> of *consciousness*.
Yet when Maharishi described his attunement to Guru Dev, he referred to his
ability to anticipate hi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > I would agree.
> >
> > You "would". ?
> >
> > "would" is the present c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > I would agree.
>
> You "would". ?
>
> "would" is the present conditional. It implies an "if".
>
> You would agree IF [what]?
"If you asked me
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The interesting thing about this discussion is that
> > > according to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would agree.
You "would". ?
"would" is the present conditional. It implies an "if".
You would agree IF [what]?
Don't worry. I am just having fun with language. I say, "I would
agree" sometimes too. I am really
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The interesting thing about this discussion is that
> > > according to MMY, h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right NOW...
>
> First there is an I -- then there is no I -- then there is.
>
> Second there is a mind--then there is no mind--then there is.
>
> Third there is a mountain--then there is no mountain--then there is.
>
301 - 344 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
