--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sal, you forget to mention these gems of wisdom below from
> > TurquoiseB for which he has never apologized and which at the
time
> > I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Sal, you forget to mention these gems of wisdom below from
> TurquoiseB for which he has never apologized and which at the time
> I found very offensive and disgusted by.
> MUCH MUCH WORSE than anything
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 11:22 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > Well, it's a good thing you aren't drawing any
> > conclusions from this, Sal.
> >
> > You didn't actually *read the posts*, did you?
> >
> > Because if you had,
Hi Sal, you forget to mention these gems of wisdom below from
TurquoiseB for which he has never apologized and which at the time I
found very offensive and disgusted by.
MUCH MUCH WORSE than anything Judy has EVER said. Admit it Sal, or
are you a prejudiced born-again fanatic like Bush, Rice
I did the exact same exercise for alt.meditation.transcendental about
4 years ago and Judy came out #1 there, too.
Remember that, Judy?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> OK, having some free time this morning, I thought I'd pull a
Barry. :)
>
I suppose one conclusion could be that Judy is less of a hypocrite and
liar than others since she is, apparently, being called such less.
However, I am guessing some might take a different angle on this. But
if the count had been of blogs on GWB, and many bloggers used copious
amounts of the words
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That was great. I'm just glad I was able to up my own numbers this
> morning before your count!
>
Is this a new yahoo feature? Or are you doing so in a mail client?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 11:22 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > Well, it's a good thing you aren't drawing any
> > conclusions from this, Sal.
> >
> > You didn't actually *read the posts*, did you?
> >
> > Because if you had,
On May 6, 2007, at 11:22 AM, authfriend wrote:
> Well, it's a good thing you aren't drawing any
> conclusions from this, Sal.
>
> You didn't actually *read the posts*, did you?
>
> Because if you had, you'd have discovered that by
> *far* the majority of my posts with the word "liar"
> in them, fo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> OK, having some free time this morning, I thought I'd pull a
> Barry. :) So here's our latest poll, on who uses inflammatory
> language the most, since that seems to be a hot topic lately
> (apart from flinging dun
On May 6, 2007, at 11:03 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
That was great. I'm just glad I was able to up my own numbers this
morning before your count!
I figured you'd get a kick out of it, Curtis, especially the dung part.
:)
Sal
That was great. I'm just glad I was able to up my own numbers this
morning before your count!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> OK, having some free time this morning, I thought I'd pull a Barry. :)
> So here's our latest poll, on who uses inflam
12 matches
Mail list logo
