--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2008, at 5:35 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>
> >> All believers in reincarnation know that God recycles.
> > Nonbelievers
> >> have Newton's third law to comfort them and the law of
> > conservation of
> >> ener
Hi Dawn:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 1:31 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>> Sounds like you were surprised your View had a name.
>>
>> From my POV Annihilationism is a false View, based on personal
>> experience. But I'd also add the conventional view of
> reincarnation
>> may represent more of a parody th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
> wrote:
> >
> > it sounds like you may be relying on some nebulous
> > subjective experience to comfort yourself in the face
> > of your eventual death.
>
> However, if your belief that you will just
> blink out turns out not to be true, you've
> still got a heckuva confusing journey through
> the Bardo ahead of you. And you'll be unpre-
> pared for any of it.
>
> All in all, gettin' all Pascal's Wager on this
> issue, I contend that my belief, alth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> it sounds like you may be relying on some nebulous
> subjective experience to comfort yourself in the face
> of your eventual death.
I cannot speak for Vaj, but my subjective
experiences are anything but neb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2008, at 9:47 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 2, 2008, at 8:24 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
> >>
> >>> what is wrong with being dead wh
On Nov 2, 2008, at 9:47 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2008, at 8:24 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
what is wrong with being dead when we are dead? one moment i am
alive and the next i no longer exist ever again.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2008, at 8:24 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>
> > what is wrong with being dead when we are dead? one moment i am
> > alive and the next i no longer exist ever again. perhaps my energy
> > just becomes photonic w
On Nov 2, 2008, at 8:24 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
> what is wrong with being dead when we are dead? one moment i am
> alive and the next i no longer exist ever again. perhaps my energy
> just becomes photonic waves between here and some distant galaxy.
> what's the problem?
Maybe you're an A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2008, at 5:35 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>
> >> All believers in reincarnation know that God recycles.
> > Nonbelievers
> >> have Newton's third law to comfort them and the law of
> > conservation of
> >> ener
On Nov 2, 2008, at 5:35 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>> All believers in reincarnation know that God recycles.
> Nonbelievers
>> have Newton's third law to comfort them and the law of
> conservation of
>> energy.
>>
> what is god? dead is dead. poof-finito. reincarnation is another
> scam perpet
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:04 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > > Curtis, you are sounding very un-Obama-ish and very Bush-like
> with
> > > all this talk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:04 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > Curtis, you are sounding very un-Obama-ish and very Bush-like
with
> > all this talk about guns and coming out ablazing if you find your
> > life is in danger.
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Curtis, you are sounding very un-Obama-ish and very Bush-like
Actually I think Obama probably spent more time in neighborhoods like
the one I live in than Bush. He probably knows how to handle himself
with the homie
On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:04 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> Curtis, you are sounding very un-Obama-ish and very Bush-like with
> all this talk about guns and coming out ablazing if you find your
> life is in danger.
>
> May I suggest that instead of violence that you consider whipping out
> your mouthharp a
Curtis, you are sounding very un-Obama-ish and very Bush-like with
all this talk about guns and coming out ablazing if you find your
life is in danger.
May I suggest that instead of violence that you consider whipping out
your mouthharp and performing a sweet little ditty for the crack-head
wh
On Nov 2, 2008, at 2:35 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
>
> That's interesting. Did you load the shells yourself? I've got a
> type of shell (Glaser safety slugs) for my Walther that wont go
> through my apartment walls. But they are designed to be very, very
> bad for the person they hit.
A
That's interesting. Did you load the shells yourself? I've got a
type of shell (Glaser safety slugs) for my Walther that wont go
through my apartment walls. But they are designed to be very, very
bad for the person they hit.
The only way I could imagine using it is if I hear someone in my
apa
On Nov 2, 2008, at 2:08 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> My GF just got a wicked stun baton because she was bitten by a dog
> while roller blading. That might be a useful thing to have since I
> doubt my ability to pull the trigger of a gun on another person. Even
> trained cops and solders have t
I'm not an NRA guy, and I think some of their oppositions to
background checks was wrong. I agree that the intention of the second
amendment had nothing to do with today because no militia could stand
up to the US army if the president went nuts.
That said, I also believe that people who are no
20 matches
Mail list logo
