Sorry about the confusion. At the risk of getting banned from posting to the
group and just for the record, I found your name on Facebook and so I posted a
friend's request, but I never received a reply. Is it alright if we call you
"Curtis"? Thanks.
http://tinyurl.com/pdtuus3 http://tinyurl
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Is it alright with you if I call you "curtisdeltablues", since that seems to
be your real professional name AND your alias for social media? Thanks.
Richard,
It is not my professional name. It is a name I use nowhere else but on this
site
Thanks for all the information. I apologize for ever calling you
"authorfriend" - I didn't realize that you preferred your real name, "Judy".
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I think this excess of caution from you and others, frankly, is just another
way to express resistance
/Is it alright with you if I call you "curtisdeltablues", since that seems
to be your real professional name AND your alias for social media? Thanks./
Quoting "curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
:
Doug, thanks for taking the time to fully explain your new role
here. I am certa
/Thanks for the clarification. I am sorry I ever called you "Buck". It
sounds complicated, so you can just call me "troll" for from now on -
eveyone will know who you mean, right? LoL!/
Quoting "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
:
CDB, I am glad you are back and I hope I can len
/Just don't call me "Shirley" ever again. LoL!/
Quoting "curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
:
"When he let Richard back on I realized that I am on my own here and I have
no trust in the system to protect my interests here."
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
/Thanks for all the comments. You can call me Richard, or Dick, or
Willytex, or anything else you want to call me - I don't care. LoL!/
Quoting "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
:
I think this excess of caution from you and others, frankly, is
just another way to express resistanc
Excellent distinctions! I think I could tighten up a bit in my own use of the
term.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote (to Curtis) :
That personalized invasion of your privacy was a low point on FFL that was way
against Rick's or
Doug, thanks for taking the time to fully explain your new role here. I am
certainly more comfortable interacting with an actual person rather than an act
so this change is welcome. I will intersperse my comments below.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
CDB, I am glad you are back
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
However, I do feel the need to point out that the approach you outline above
still leaves you as "The man behind the curtain," not only censoring the flow
of content to Fairfield Life, but doing so in secret.
If you delete posts, how will a
From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 5:41 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Confusion
Writing more generally, soon I am goingto start following Rick's lead on this
and start to delete posts orm
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote (to Curtis) :
That personalized invasion of your privacy was a low point on FFL that was way
against Rick's original intentions for the site and clearly against what are
now the yahoo-groups guidelines. Yours was proly not the moment of decline bu
CDB, I am glad you are back and I hope I can lend you as well as some others
who would return some protection of trust and safety here to write more freely.
The railroading of you by invasion of privacy was one of the more infamous
times of abuse on FFL.
That personalized invasion of your
Thanks Judy, I had not seen that and it does answer some of my concerns about
Rick's intentions as well as supports your view that it is OK to use Doug's
real name officially. Much appreciated.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I think this excess of caution from you and others, frankly, is just another
way to express resistance to the new moderation regime, by making it seem far
more onerous than it has any likelihood o
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I think this excess of caution from you and others, frankly, is just another
way to express resistance to the new moderation regime, by making it seem far
more onerous than it has any likelihood of turning out to be.
Me: I don't see the connect
I think this excess of caution from you and others, frankly, is just another
way to express resistance to the new moderation regime, by making it seem far
more onerous than it has any likelihood of turning out to be. Doug will get
bounced as moderator by Rick if he overdoes things, and he knows
I didn't snip it as a statement about your posting it Judy. I am just
exercising and abundance of caution in these changing times where I don't
expect the benefit of any doubt. I looked back at a few of Buck's posts and
didn't see his name so until he directly says it is OK to me I am trying to
Regarding your snippage below, Rick's policy has always been that the use of
real names is prohibited only if the person wishes to remain anonymous. Doug
uses his real first name to sign his posts, and his last name is in the header
of his posts, so there was no need to snip it. Mine isn't in th
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My recollection is that Doug was here, as Doug, for quite awhile after you
joined us before becoming "Buck." Maybe someone else remembers the chronology
more clearly.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Me: Yes that is true. I believe a
usality of Buck's ascendency to the
moderator's throne after all.
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1:44 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Confusion
FWIW, "Buck" hasn't been around f
My recollection is that Doug was here, as Doug, for quite awhile after you
joined us before becoming "Buck." Maybe someone else remembers the chronology
more clearly.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
FWIW, "Buck" hasn't been around
fieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1:44 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Confusion
FWIW, "Buck" hasn't been around for quite some time now. The person
appointed to moderate FFL (i.e., to ensure posts do not violate the Yahoo
Guidelines) is Doug Hamil
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
FWIW, "Buck" hasn't been around for quite some time now. The person appointed
to moderate FFL (i.e., to ensure posts do not violate the Yahoo Guidelines) is
Doug Hamilton.
That should answer at least some of your questions.
Thank you Judy. It m
FWIW, "Buck" hasn't been around for quite some time now. The person appointed
to moderate FFL (i.e., to ensure posts do not violate the Yahoo Guidelines) is
Doug Hamilton.
That should answer at least some of your questions.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Imagine my surprise
Do you mean this?
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad - Shankara Bhashya translated by Swami Madhavananda
https://archive.org/stream/Brihadaranyaka.Upanishad.Shankara.Bhashya.by.Swami.Madhavananda#page/n137/mode/2up
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad - Shankara Bhashya translated by Swami Madhavananda
https:/
On 10/5/2014 11:19 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Perhaps I've misunderstood, perhaps you have, or perhaps Shankara is
simply wrong.
>
/MMY points out that even samadhi, which is already the state of Yoga in
the sense of transcendental consciousness, serves as a means to the
Perhaps I've misunderstood, perhaps you have, or perhaps Shankara is simply
wrong.
L
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Lawson sez:
L: In order for perception to be perception, there must be a physical nervous
system.
This is contradicted by the Vedanta and Yoga
> > All the Indian deified heros such as Vasudeva,
> > Rama, Ramchandra, and Krishna came long after
> > the composition of the Vedas in 1500 B.C.
> >
Bhairitu wrote:
> Depends upon the translations doesn't it?
>
No. You are mistaken if you mean the Rig Veda refers
to a dark lustful youth play
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Indian yogis personified the fields of nature...
>>
>>
> You need to get some smarts, Mr. Bharat2. There
> were no 'yogis' mentioned in the Vedas. It was
> the Vedic authors who personified the forces of
> nature. Patanjali does not menti
emptybill wrote:
> Over the years I have heard an argument professed by
> some former TM meditators who stopped practicing because
> they claimed they were deceived about the "meaning"
> of mantra-s.
>
Have you noticed, Bill, how rapidly the content of messages
like this go from intelligence
> When the Rishis wanted to express the silent value
> of pure consciousness they gave a name Shiva
>
Mr. Henry Herzberger needs to read some Indian history.
There's no mention of 'Shiva' in the Rig Veda and no
mention of any bija mantras. The various Hindu sects,
Shaivaism, Vaishnaiva, and
Bhairitu wrote:
> Indian yogis personified the fields of nature...
>
You need to get some smarts, Mr. Bharat2. There
were no 'yogis' mentioned in the Vedas. It was
the Vedic authors who personified the forces of
nature. Patanjali does not mention any 'forces
of nature' in his Yoga Sutras. Ishva
On Sep 18, 2007, at 11:40 AM, authfriend wrote:
> Stop trying to twist people intentions as if you knew what
> they were.
Yeah, it's a drag when somebody sees right through
your intentions, ain't it?
You tell me.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 17, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:51 PM, emptybill wrote:
On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
I think it dismisses way too much to reduce the gods to qualities of
consciousness. In the sense that we are all just qualities of
consciousness, I suppose you could say that's true. But in the
pra
On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
I think it dismisses way too much to reduce the gods to qualities of
consciousness. In the sense that we are all just qualities of
consciousness, I suppose you could say that's true. But in the
practical sense, the gods are unique individuals,
On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think it dismisses way too much t
On Sep 17, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
>
> > I think it dismisses way too much to reduce the gods to
qualities
> > of consciousness. In the sense that we are al
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
>
> > I think it dismisses way too much to reduce the gods to
qualities
> > of consciousness. In the sense that we are all just qualities of
> > consciousness, I supp
On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
I think it dismisses way too much to reduce the gods to qualities
of consciousness. In the sense that we are all just qualities of
consciousness, I suppose you could say that's true. But in the
practical sense, the gods are unique individu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The gods need humans to invent things like cocktails.
Wouldn't that be a cool thing to have on your resume?
Bartender, the Samadhi bar at the Brahmaloka Hilton:
* Designed, mixed and served cocktails from the fines
The gods need humans to invent things like cocktails.
--- TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Belief is gods is silly.
> >
> > OffWorld
>
>
> Belief in humans is silly.
>
> The gods, over cockta
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Belief is gods is silly.
>
> OffWorld
Belief in humans is silly.
The gods, over cocktails
Bronte Baxter wrote:
>
> "Indra The Unifying Value of the Self which unifies all the laws of
> nature in order to promote evolution (the Power of dharma)
>
> Indrani or Sachi The feminine power of unification and evolution"
>
>
> Hmm. If gods are simply anthropomophisms invented by t
"Indra The Unifying Value of the Self which unifies all the laws of
nature in order to promote evolution (the Power of dharma)
Indrani or Sachi The feminine power of unification and evolution"
Hmm. If gods are simply anthropomophisms invented by the sages to explain
concepts they t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Judy, a very good find, thanks.
I'd completely forgotten it existed. I can't
believe I came across it entirely accidentally
right on the heels of emptybill's post on the
same topic.
Judy, a very good find, thanks.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> > Indian yogis personified the fields of nature they perceived to
> > make the science of yoga more understandable to th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of off_world_beings
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 9:09 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subj
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of off_world_beings
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 9:09 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Confusion between mantras and deities in
meditation
<< Do you think any subtle or celestial
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of off_world_beings
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 5:55 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subj
--Thx, Authfriend, excellent article! (but there's one minor flaw in
it). He's implying that such entities are only symbolic of
impersonal forces and forgot the convenient fact that the Deities
are also "real" Personalities that can interact with humans, just as
humans can interact with other h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> > Indian yogis personified the fields of nature they perceived to
> > make the science of yoga more understandable to the general
public.
> > I heard a gre
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indian yogis personified the fields of nature they perceived to
> make the science of yoga more understandable to the general public.
> I heard a great lecture on this when in Cochin once. Personification
> also makes teac
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Over the years I have heard an argument professed by some former TM
> meditators who stopped practicing because they claimed they were
> deceived about the "meaning" of mantra-s. I have also seen
> similar declarati
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of off_world_beings
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 5:55 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Confusion between mantras and deities in
meditation
Belief is gods is silly.
You don’t think they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Over the years I have heard an argument professed by some former TM
> meditators who stopped practicing because they claimed they were
> deceived about the "meaning" of mantra-s. I have also seen
> similar declarati
58 matches
Mail list logo