Look at thy inner self with the eyes of the spirit, and ask thyself whether
thou art content with thyself. What hast thou attained relying on reason only?
What art thou? You are young or old, you are rich or poor, you are clever or
not, you are well educated or not. And what have you done with a
Thou hatest it? Then change it, purify thyself; and as thou art purified, thou
wilt gain wisdom. Look at your life, my dear fellows. How have you spent it? In
riotous orgies and debauchery, receiving
everything from society and giving nothing in return. You have become the
possessor of earthly w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> My dear fellows--taking on yourselves responsibility for your own guidance;
> and what have you done? You have not helped to find the way of truth, my dear
> fellows, but have thrust into an abyss of deceit and misery.
Buck, at some point
My dear fellows--taking on yourselves responsibility for your own guidance; and
what have you done? You have not helped to find the way of truth, my dear
fellows, but have thrust into an abyss of deceit and misery.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
> It is not to be appre
It is not to be apprehended by reason, but by life.
The highest wisdom and truth are like the purest liquid we may wish to imbibe.
Can I receive that pure liquid into an impure vessel and judge of its purity?
Only by the inner purification of thyself can thee retain in some degree of
purity th
If It were not, you and I would not be speaking of It. Of what, of whom, are we
speaking? Who invented It, if It did not exist? Whence came their conception
of the existence of such an incomprehensible Being? Didst they, and why did the
whole world, conceive the idea of the existence of such an
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 12:18 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment WELL STATED BUCK
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
> Funny, but I think Buck and his attitudes and platitudes would keep me from
> ever e
It exists, but to understand It is hard. If it were a man whose existence they
doubt I could bring him to them, could take him by the hand and show him to
them. But how can I, an insignificant mortal, show Its omnipotence, Its
infinity, and all Its mercy to them who are blind, or who shut their
Considering the huge crop of goofballs that the TM-org has
spawned, starting from your master Robin Carlsen, Bevan
Morris and so on, any sane rational observer would balk.
Buck dosen't sound any worse than them.
--- "Ann" wrote:
>
> Funny, but I think Buck and his attitudes and platitudes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
> Funny, but I think Buck and his attitudes and platitudes would keep me from
> ever embracing TM and its philosophies more than even the crown-wearing
> Rajas.
No, no that's a mistake ! You should most definately start TM. In that way yo
Funny, but I think Buck and his attitudes and platitudes would keep me from
ever embracing TM and its philosophies more than even the crown-wearing Rajas.
I have nothing against TM or Maharishi or the sidhis but boy, does Buck ever
turn me off. Just a tip Buck: the more you keep your mouth shut
Who art thou? They dreamest that they art wise because they could publish their
blasphemous words, and are more foolish and unreasonable than a little child,
who, playing with the parts of a skillfully made watch, dares to say that, as
he does not understand its use, he does not believe in the m
It is pitiable, they 'know' It not and such they are very unhappy. They do not
know It, but It is here, It is in me, It is in my words, It is in thee, and
even in those blasphemous words they have just published!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> Yes, of course theses two
Yes, of course theses two fellows publishing here do not 'know' It as they
wish, one cannot 'know' It. They do not 'know' It and that is why they are
unhappy.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> Yes, no one attains to truth by himself. Only by laying stone on stone with
>
Yes, no one attains to truth by himself. Only by laying stone on stone with the
cooperation of all, by the millions of generations from our forefathers to our
own times, is that temple reared which is to be a worthy dwelling place of the
Great God the Unified Field
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogro
k
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 8:57 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment WELL STATED BUCK
Yes, well we know their outlook,and the view of life they
mention, and which they think is the result of their own mental efforts, is the
one held by the majori
Yes, well we know their outlook,and the view of life they
mention, and which they think is the result of their own mental efforts, is the
one held by the majority of people, and is the invariable fruit of pride,
indolence, and ignorance. Forgive me but if I had not known it I should not
have add
Thanks for this reply Buck & a host of Ur other reply's here in polite
respect to YOU & all & here in this form!
In a message dated 1/13/2013 8:25:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes:
Oh you fellows just assume no paths lead toward an awakening for people
nor co
18 matches
Mail list logo
