--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mahdeealoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to publish
a book about this? Is
> there something he could refute/defend, like the fact that he was
not her "boyfriend" and
> just her Guru? HELLO! G
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/9/06 10:43 PM, mahdeealoo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to
publish a book
> > about this?
>
> I don't know. Maybe she doesn't want to embarr
"Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
against their will?"
Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiritual master? I
mean gosh, I make this grade, even by Judy's perspective of me.
You guys rock! I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
> advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
> against their will?"
>
> Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
> advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
> against their will?"
>
> Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
>> advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
>> against their will?"
>
> Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a sp
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment that these
accusations were true, how would that change your practise of TM?
Assuming that I still meditate, his personal life has nothing to do with my spi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd face the picture of Mahesh the other way when my eyes were closed?
Assuming I have pictures of MMY to turn around, why would I face the picture the other way
when my eyes are closed? I can't see through my eyelids, yet.
So was my reply. Good Morning :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 10, 2006, at 7:30 AM, mahdeealoo wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > I'd face the picture of Mahesh the other way when my eyes were closed?
> >
>
Yes, I agree. It is said that the gross relative can be quite gross.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 9, 2006, at 11:43 PM, mahdeealoo wrote:
>
> >
> > Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to publish
> > a book about this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mahdeealoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment that
> > these accusations were true, how would that change your practise
> > of TM?
>
>
"For the most part, this is a forum composed
of people who are more than aware of the good things about
Maharishi and the TM movement and the less-than-good
things, and who have come to some sense of balance and
comfort with both. They are who they are, right here, right
now, in the present."
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mahdeealoo"
wrote:
> > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
wrote:
> > > But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment
> > > that these accusation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "For the most part, this is a forum composed
>> of people who are more than aware of the good things about
>> Maharishi and the TM movement and the less-than-good
>> things, and who have come to some sense
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mahdeealoo"
> wrote:
> > > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> > > > But I have a
Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it would
have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even he
had achieved. Now I think of it as such a strange instruction, almost
crazy-making. I mean if God didn't want us to be tempted ,why did he
make our arms so l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mahdeealoo"
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
wrote:
> > > But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment that
> > > t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it
would
> have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even he
> had achieved. Now I think of it as such a strange instruction,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/10/06 10:06 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it
would
> > have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even
I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
non-sexual. I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
till it all came out. Then I felt so naive!
I had a good friend in the M initiator group who I felt was angelic
like that. Then it turned out that he was just gay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/10/06 12:25 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > Rick, I think of something I remember reading that Paul McCartney
> > said to John Lennon on his return to England from India. As you'll
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > on 5/10/06 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> > "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> >
Hi Peter. Thanks for the positive words about me in your previous
posts. We had so many engaging discussions at MIU.
On your point about the puritanical nature of the movement, remember
how shocking it was to read the uncensored Rig Veda! That culture
seemed a little more comfortable with t
Curtis (hey! How are you?)
you had good experiences through MMY/TM/TM-siddhis, I
assume. How do you balance/reconcile/whatever your
good experiences with the self-evident whackiness?
-Peter
I did have great experiences with the program. For me it was the
interpretation of what those experience
+ women..?? ShempMcGurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:18:08 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh? I don't understand your question. Please read it over and ask it again because your first and second sentences seem contradictory t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
> > non-sexual. I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
> > ti
;
> ShempMcGurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:18:08 -
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
>
>
> I don't understand your question. Please read it over and ask
it
> again because your first and secon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
> >
> > > I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
> >
rk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:11:16 -0000Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for
MMY, eh? Yes, Jason, it is the obligation of life-long celibates to satify the sexual urges of their students if and only if the students initiate. > For b
;s not really Maharishi's fault.
>
> He can't say NO and disappoint his disciples.??
He can say "yes" and renounce his monk's vows...and not necessarily
in that order...
>
> ShempMcGurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
> >
> > > I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/10/06 6:27 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Jokes apart, Sir Archer mentioned that it wasn't a One-Way
street.
> >
> >
> >
> > If the women did initiate and Maha
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:59:20 -0500Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?- Maharishi initiated all the relationships Im aware
of, but never forcefully. The accounts indicate that he didnt display the coercion and persistence that usually characterizes men over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Gloria Steinem says that a man is allowed one free grope, one free
> open mouthed kiss, one free placing of a woman's hand over the man's
> genitals and as long as a man respects the woman's "no" to all of
> t
--- lurkernomore wrote:
>
> --- shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > >Gloria Steinem says that a man is allowed one free grope
>
> Man, a solid two chuckle morning. This is good.
Next time I see Gloria I'm going to take her up on
that free grope. That's very generous of her.
To subscribe, send
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > >Gloria Steinem says that a man is allowed one free grope
> >
>
> Next time I see Gloria I'm going to take her up on
> that free grope. That's very generous of her.
She must have been a beautiful bab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/10/06 4:15 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Do you think a Great Spiritual leader like Maharishi would
be stupid
> > enough to first approach those 5+ women first.??
> >
> > I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
> > doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and a
> > devotee
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
> doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and a
> devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY (both
> men and
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> wrote:
>
> > I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
no
> > doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and
a
> > devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY
(both
> > men an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
> no
> > > doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Mah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71"
wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have been working with women that has been abused.
--- HMuktananda's case differed since strong evidence points
to the "victims" being underage. Thus, they (some, many, all?) were
not adults. Thus, they were victims.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- HMuktananda's case differed since strong evidence
points
> to the "victims" being underage. Thus, they (some, many, all?)
were
> not adults. Thus, they were victims.
Yes. If someone is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> wrote:
>
> > I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
no
> > doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and
a
> > devo
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people with loot of Money.
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
--- "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> A few years ago I made this very point when someone who had been involved with Muktananda and had been ab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
> no
> > > doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and
> a
> > > devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for M
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot
> of Money.
Freudian slip?
>
> Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
>
>
> --- "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
> > Money.
> >
> > Did Maharishi give those women Money or something
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
from What is Enlightenment magazine.
>
...and let's not forget the Who, When, Where, and How is Enlightenment
too! Of course, it'd be a much larger magazine...Happy Saturday
morning everyone!
To subscrib
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
> > Money.
> >
> > Did Maharishi give those women Money or something
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/13/06 10:22 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Maharish
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
> > >
> > > I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
> > > dou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
> with loot of
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
> with loot of
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/13/06 10:22 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In F
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
, Prof. Moriarty would reform himself and act more in tune with the Total-Natural-Law..?? Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh? you
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
>
>
> you can be pregnant and then have a miscarriage.
>
>
> Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ha Ha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher;
> is this a Catholic thing? or something?
Theoretically, it should not matter. What might matter
is 1) whether the teacher says one thing in public
> Or, Prof. Moriarty would reform himself and act more in tune
with the Total-Natural-Law..??
>
>
>
> Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re
Total-Natural-Law..??
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick Archer wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
> >
> >
> > you can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher; is this
> a Catholic thing? or something?
There's a very long tradition, possibly based on
experience, that when sexual energy is sublimated,
it facili
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher;
> > is this a Catholic thing? or something?
>
> Theoretically, it should not matt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Sir. Rick Archer, are you implying that Maharishi was a Good Guru and then became a
Not-so-Good Guru..??!!
>
> I have a doubt, Prof. Moriarty was always one step ahead of Sherlock Holmes. If P
arty would reform himself and act more in tune
> with the Total-Natural-Law..??
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick Archer wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
> &
Or, Prof. Moriarty would reform himself and act more in tune
> with the Total-Natural-Law..??
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick Archer wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
> >
> &
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher; is this
> > a Catholic thing? or something?
>
> There's a very long tradition, pos
Did any teachers ever date your initiates? I always felt squirrelly
about this. It seemed to violate the ethics of the therapist/client
relationship. I remember being attracted to some of them, and
enjoying the fantasy of slipping in an instruction to
"slowly open the thighs"! I don't rememb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > MMY's quasi-official announcement on the subject is that for
> > people who are comfortable
> > with celibacy, this is the fastest way to get enlightened, but
> > forp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > MMY's quasi-official announcement on the subject is that for people
> > who are comfortable
> > with celibacy, this is the fastest way to get enlightened, but for
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
"There's a Miss Boom-Boom LaVerne here for you,"
Ah, another Bob Cummings fan.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join Th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did any teachers ever date your initiates? I always felt squirrelly
> about this. It seemed to violate the ethics of the therapist/client
> relationship. I remember being attracted to some of them, and
> e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 16, 2006, at 11:37 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> >
> > So you're saying that he's been screwing prostitutes in Holland?
>
>
> Maybe just working on some new techniques?
>
I've never gotten any feeling of personal hos
16 May 2006 10:47:36 -0400Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY,
eh? Of course he's lived in a country where prostitution is legal for how long now? No need for a lifemate, just cash and a place to go. On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote: > I see no
On May 10, 2006, at 1:15 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mahdeealoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to publish
> a book about this? Is
> > there something he could refute/defend, like the fact tha
On May 10, 2006, at 7:30 AM, mahdeealoo wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd face the picture of Mahesh the other way when my eyes were closed?
>
> Assuming I have pictures of MMY to turn around, why would I face
> the picture the other way
> wh
on 5/10/06 12:25 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Rick, I think of something I remember reading that Paul McCartney
> said to John Lennon on his return to England from India. As you'll
> recall Ringo and Paul left earlier than George and John did, so Paul
> wasn't around when
on 5/10/06 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> "Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
>> advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
>> against
on 5/10/06 10:06 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it would
> have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even he
> had achieved. Now I think of it as such a strange instruction, almost
> crazy-making.
on 5/10/06 10:48 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I think there's a time and place for everything, and I think
> celibacy has
>> its value. I'm open to the possibility that in MMY's case, it was
> no longer
>> relevant.
>>
> Rick, when you found out and became convinced about
on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
> non-sexual. I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
> till it all came out. Then I felt so naive!
>
> I had a good friend in the M initiator gro
on 5/10/06 12:57 PM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So why are you making it your business now? People seem very unforgiving.
> This happened, what, 40 years ago? How long are you going to let it bug
> you? Another 40 years? I remember a remark made by the Dalai Lama, to the
> effect t
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> on 5/10/06 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "curtisdeltablues"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> "Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming
> that he took
> >> advantage
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
on 5/10/06 4:15 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think a Great Spiritual leader like Maharishi would be stupid enough to first approach those 5+ women first.??
If this is true, those 5+ women
On May 10, 2006, at 6:13 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> How much do you want to bet that this fellow is still teaching TM
> for two -- and ONLY two -- reasons:
>
> 1) MMY is NOT aware that a homosexual is giving out his teaching; and
>
> 2) His brother is high-placed in the TMO.
>
3) The TMO
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?-
on 5/10/06 6:27 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jokes apart, Sir Archer mentioned that it wasn't a One-Way street.
If the women did initiate and Maharishi was forced to Satisfy their sexual
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?-
on 5/11/06 4:56 AM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is true, then it's sad. A seer who renounced everything should never initiate relationships.
there are some in the Sexy Sadie file.
on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
> doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and a
> devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY (both
> men and women), the power of
on 5/12/06 9:48 PM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just think that to call these women "victims" is pathetic. They weren't
> victims
> of anything. They were adult women who were free to do whatever they
> wanted. They weren't coerced. And as far as abuse of power is concerned, it
>
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people with loot of Money.
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
In one case he did. After
on 5/13/06 10:22 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
> with loot of
>>> Mo
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
on 5/13/06 4:17 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha Ha, My keyboard has a problem with the letter "O' . The o's run off without control.
No man in his right mind would call his Sec
On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote:
> MMY's quasi-official announcement on the subject is that for people
> who are comfortable
> with celibacy, this is the fastest way to get enlightened, but for
> people who are not, the
> strain of trying to remain celibate is counter-evolution
On May 16, 2006, at 11:37 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> So you're saying that he's been screwing prostitutes in Holland?
Maybe just working on some new techniques?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
