The third sentence of Vyaasa's Yoga-suutra-bhaashya, IV 1,
goes like this:
mantrairaakaashagamanaaNimaadilaabhaH
(Attempt at sandhi-vigraha:
mantraiH; aakaasha-gamana; aNimaa + aadi -laabhaH)
Suggestion for translation:
With the help of mantras (mantraiH; instrumental plural)
acquisition[?]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your twisting what he actually said. A decent translation of what
Patanjali said might be botananicals although I would extend that
to include herbo-mineral preparations, as many preparations
attributed to Patanjali
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 12, 2007, at 1:23 PM, new.morning wrote:
snip
Even Patanjali said siddhis could be achieved via drugs.
Your [sic] twisting what he actually said.
Twisting??
A decent translation of what Patanjali said might be
On May 13, 2007, at 9:49 AM, cardemaister wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your twisting what he actually said. A decent translation of what
Patanjali said might be botananicals although I would extend that
to include herbo-mineral preparations,
Newy,
Thanks for your response. It's like an all you can eat buffet --
nay -- more like all you can force yourself to eat using a plumber's
helper to cram the victuals down your gullet.
My brain is going to get love handles from this rich fare.
Burpit's already coming up on me. Where's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 12, 2007, at 1:23 PM, new.morning wrote:
Re: Whole Brain Functioning - flaws of Unity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
New morning was talking about drugs earlier
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Re: Whole Brain Functioning - flaws of Unity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
New morning was talking about drugs earlier as a way to
temporarily
alleviate suffering, with
And then we run headlong into the question posed by Edg
earler, isn't everything a drug? (or a meditation?).
Yes. Particularly in the sense that particular pharmecutical drugs,
and street drugs (marijuana, ectasy, cocaine, meth, LSD), and common
use drugs (caffeine, alcohol, nicotine) and
new.morning
You seem hip enough to be a relative expert to moi, so let me ask for
your opinion on the Josephson Tunnelling that may or may not be
operative between synapses.
If you think it's a dynamic, how do you see it being interactive with
the ordinary synaptic transmissions involving
Wow, really excellent stuff. Thank you for bringing that up and
articulating it so well.
Although ignorance seems so hard to dispel, Claudio's earlier remark
about how overwhelming enlightenment should be is more the truth.
Almost anything can be the stimulus/catalyst to that realization and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And then we run headlong into the question posed by Edg
earler, isn't everything a drug? (or a meditation?).
Yes. Particularly in the sense that particular pharmecutical drugs,
and street drugs (marijuana, ectasy,
Edg,
Thank you for your commments on my pieces today. For some I am sure,
they are pieces of the thing I said to follow.
Your brain questions are way beyond my level. I searched for current
cites on J tunneling and synapes and didn't find much. Found this
article. Which is beyond my expertise
12 matches
Mail list logo
