[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lurk, I don't get what you and a few others are trying to do--wreck the place? There's already a quota on posts, which most people supported, and now there's you and a few others calling for Rick to be content cop

[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Rick, what it is? I think we have been getting along pretty good. If you look at the last day and a half of marked posts, you should have some idea. There may just be three or four of these, marked to your

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000 Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:31 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else. Lurk: Okay Sal, obviously your POV is going

[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread mainstream20016
or Assign Your Role to Someone Else. Lurk: Okay Sal, obviously your POV is going to win the day. I was just going by the consensus that was arrived at a few weeks ago. No problem if no one but me is concerned about it. You're not the only one. I thought the dialog has been pretty

[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Again, please tell me who the problem children have been. Have they stopped, or are they still at it? No soup for them. Barry, Offworld, and Shemp, most recently (well, Barry pretty much continuously). SAL--a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:31 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote: Okay Sal, obviously your POV is going to win the day. I was just going by the consensus that was arrived at a few weeks ago. No problem if no one but me is concerned about it. I thought the dialog has been pretty good lately, but I'm not

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:05 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else. What guidelines specifically, Lurk? Guidelines

[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote: snip Again, please tell me who the problem children have been. Have they stopped, or are they still at it? No soup for them. Barry, Offworld, and

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:01 PM, authfriend wrote: SAL--a consensus was indeed declared that flaming should stop, after considerable discussion. You must have missed it. Some of us objected, but Rick said he was going to try it and see what happened. Oh, okay. I doubt I missed it, I must have

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else.

2007-10-01 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of off_world_beings Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:54 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, Respond or Assign Your Role to Someone Else. --- In HYPERLINK mailto:FairfieldLife