--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
--- sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
--- In
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:It's the dfference between relative and absolute, played out neurologically within the brain. OR, the experience of this within the brain, leads one to describe the world in these terms. Either way, its radically different than the high concentration
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's the dfference between relative and absolute, played out
neurologically within the brain.
OR, the experience of this within the brain, leads one to describe
the world
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote: It's the dfference between relative and absolute, played out neurologically within the brain. OR, the experience of this within the brain,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:
Where's the research?
None was necessary, although there's research out there for those who
need that crutch.
Feeling a bit superior this morning? (Therapy may help
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:46 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote: Where's the research? None was necessary, although there's research out there for those who need that crutch. Feeling a bit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's the dfference between relative and absolute, played out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:
Where's the research?
None was necessary, although there's research out there for those who
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:10 PM, sparaig wrote:Dana does EEG/fMRI research on meditators? Not that I'm aware of. Why should he? Experientially it's very easy to see the difference. LOL. Ah yes, inner experience than scientific research. That's a convenient excuse. If MMY claimed it, you'd be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:
Where's the research?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:46 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:48 AM, sparaig wrote:
Where's the research?
None was necessary, although there's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
inthislifetime300
inthislifetime300@ wrote:
Sorry Judy,
David signature was not on the previous post.
It was at the
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, please send this info to the Fairfield Ledger
on 8/1/06 12:58 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, please send this info to the Fairfield Ledger
on 8/1/06 1:02 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How and why would students be at MIU and NOT be meditators? I'm
confused...
Many foreign students come just to get into the US. They dont learn TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
inthislifetime300
inthislifetime300@ wrote:
Sorry Judy,
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
inthislifetime300
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]...\
At least Fred Travis is trying to ground his
theorizing with up-to-date brain functioning theory
and EEG studies. He also doesn't regress into
metaphorical analogies that are closer to phrenology
than neurology.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
inthislifetime300
inthislifetime300@ wrote:
Sorry Judy,
Well if anyone wants to contact David about a lawsuit, here is his
contact info from his diksha website:
David Bousfield attended the 21 day Process at Oneness University in
October, 2005. He is now giving Deeksha in Fairfield with Nathan and
Marie. In addition, David gives phone deeksha and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, inthislifetime300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if anyone wants to contact David about a lawsuit, here is his
contact info from his diksha website:
David Bousfield attended the 21 day Process at Oneness University
in
October, 2005. He is now giving
Sorry Judy,
David signature was not on the previous post. It was at the bottom
of his website.
\--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, inthislifetime300
inthislifetime300@ wrote:
Well if anyone wants to contact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, inthislifetime300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Judy,
David signature was not on the previous post. It was at the bottom
of his website.
OK. Anybody know whether deeksha is a practice
of a specific religion?
\--- In
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick, please send this info to the Fairfield Ledger
on 7/31/06 8:09 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Anybody know whether deeksha is a practice
of a specific religion?
Hindu related. You go to India to learn it. But other religions have similar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/31/06 8:09 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Anybody know whether deeksha is a practice
of a specific religion?
Hindu related. You go to India to learn it. But other religions have
similar
Well, wouldn't meditation that includes the repetition of the names of Hindu deities be considered Hindu as well? Seems to me they'd be compatible.
Sal
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
OK. Anybody know whether deeksha is a practice
of a specific religion?
Hindu related. You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 7/31/06 8:09 PM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
OK. Anybody know whether deeksha is a practice
of a specific religion?
Hindu related.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 7/31/06 8:09 PM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
OK. Anybody know
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the official TM
program in the dome they don't want them to be there.
Is that what people are freaking over or am I missing
something?
--- inthislifetime300
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the official TM
program in the dome they don't want them to be there.
Is that what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the official TM
program in the dome they don't want them to be there.
Is that what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Salvatore Sunshine brought up a good point:
MUM's exclusion of that Diksha fellow may in fact be a violation of
federal law: you cannot exclude someone from an activity based upon
their religion..and since MUM is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, inthislifetime300
inthislifetime300@ wrote:
Sorry Judy,
David signature was not on the previous post. It was at the bottom
of his website.
OK. Anybody know whether
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the official TM
program in the dome they don't want them to be there.
Is that what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can't figure out why everybody (everybody?) is
getting their panties in a bunch over this. If the TMO
thinks that someone is not doing the official TM
program in the dome they don't want them to be there.
Is that what
38 matches
Mail list logo
