[FairfieldLife] Re: The 70's -Now and Then...

2006-07-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > wrote: > > > > I must weigh in on the side of Now being better...because it is > > Now. > > > > Also the fact that Barry can ask 1000+ people this question > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: The 70's -Now and Then...

2006-07-02 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I must weigh in on the side of Now being better...because it is > Now. > > Also the fact that Barry can ask 1000+ people this question > simultaneously without thinking twice about it, is a huge > transformatio

[FairfieldLife] Re: The 70's -Now and Then...

2006-07-01 Thread jim_flanegin
I must weigh in on the side of Now being better...because it is Now. Also the fact that Barry can ask 1000+ people this question simultaneously without thinking twice about it, is a huge transformation from the Big Three TV channels, a local newspaper and wired phone service we had in the 70's

[FairfieldLife] Re: The 70's -Now and Then...

2006-06-30 Thread Robert Gimbel
The 70's began with the breakup of the Beatles; who were a kind of a 'voice of the sixties'. The Viet Nam war was still going on, and the protests were raging; We had just come out of the tulmutous 60's and the sexual revelution was fully in gear(it was easy to get layed). There were lot's of pyc