--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't it much more profitable to initiate 1000 people
for a $250 fee than 10 people for a $2500 fee?
Yes By a factor of 10. ; )
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY has madeit very clear that he's not trying to reach the largest
number of people at the moment, but rather to initiate the most
influential (wealthiest), who seldom shop for luxury items at
Walmart.
...Yes, but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY has madeit very clear that he's not trying to reach the largest
number of people at the moment, but rather to initiate the most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
are you sure these Indian's are poor? I would imagine they are
probably wealthy either by Indian standards or even otherwise
in India.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...Yes, but isn't he doing neither? You don't move
Rolls Royces
out of the showroom by blocking the sale of Fords.
Uns
You don't move Fords out of the showroom by pricing
them like a Rolls.
And you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It doesn't exist.
The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the student,
novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the cause, usually for
years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given to them.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It doesn't exist.
The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the
student,
novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to
It doesn't exist.
The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the
student, novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the cause,
usually for years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given
to them. It is a way to assess the worthiness of a student.
I must
If you can find one single TM-Teacher that have earned money in
teaching TM through the years, I would like to shake hands with the
person. As the most of us, I have paid all my courses in the TMO,
paid all the expenses for the courses I have held, lost income from
ordinary work - lost some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It doesn't exist.
The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the
student, novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the
cause,
usually for years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can find one single TM-Teacher that have earned money in
teaching TM through the years, I would like to shake hands with
the person.
Pleased to meetcha.
I earned a living as a full-time TM teacher for several
For without that cloning the teaching is
small scale and
ineffective in the long-term.
The TMO's initiation level is small scale and
ineffective now.
One of the main points brought up in this thread is
that, even if the organization needs initiation fee
income to maintain itself and
I was *very much* engaged in the lifelong mission of
teaching that Maharishi is engaged in. I still am.
I choose to pay for it myself. So do many of the
monks I studied with. We teach because we consider
what we have managed to learn along the Way valuable
enough that we feel the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For without that cloning the teaching is
small scale and
ineffective in the long-term.
The TMO's initiation level is small scale and
ineffective now.
Understood.
However, my understanding is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was *very much* engaged in the lifelong mission of
teaching that Maharishi is engaged in. I still am.
I choose to pay for it myself. So do many of the
monks I studied with. We teach because we consider
isn't it much more profitable to initiate 1000 people
for a $250 fee than 10 people for a $2500 fee?
Yes, as I have suggested many times.
My only point is to question the smale scale and short-term
thinking when people here are going around saying it should
be completely free, at all
snip rest of rant
My point to you was your insistance that everyone should teach for
free, and your criticism of Maharishi's methods. You have a chance
now to actually think it through.
As do you. Please read my other post about your claim
about my 'insistence' above and do some thinking
Dear Lupidus.
As a so-called independent TM-Teacher, I do not earn money by
initiating. The costs is higher than the incomes - that has been for
years. Luckily, I have my income from other things that I work with -
so I am not depending of initiating.
Ingegerd
To some of the so-called
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't exist.
A few weeks ago, when this issue came up on another
forum, I entered learn to meditate into Google and
checked what it costs to learn, from the first page
of sites found that listed prices:
TurquoiseB wrote:
As far as I can tell from my short time on
this forum, *most* of us here have been
taught how to teach basic meditation.
That's a cool thing, a WAY cool thing.
I'm just suggesting an alternate way of
DOING SOMETHING, one in which one pays
for favors received by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
isn't it much more profitable to initiate 1000 people
for a $250 fee than 10 people for a $2500 fee?
Yes, as I have suggested many times.
My only point is to question the smale scale and short-term
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip rest of rant
My point to you was your insistance that everyone should teach
for
free, and your criticism of Maharishi's methods. You have a
chance
now to actually think it through.
As do you. Please
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For without that cloning the teaching is
small scale and
ineffective in the long-term.
The TMO's initiation level is small
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For without that cloning the teaching is
small
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
are you sure these Indian's are poor? I would imagine they are
probably wealthy either by Indian standards or even otherwise
in India.
AFAIK, the only people who pay to learn TM in India are employers who
pay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It doesn't exist.
The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the student,
novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the cause, usually for
years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given to them.
27 matches
Mail list logo
