--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Isn't that a contradiction in terms?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
sex.
Would you look more favorably on homosexuals if
they engaged only in oral sex and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:52 AM, foufou_fl wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
You like making things up, don't you? And the word fag that
you
employ
twice is your word, not mine. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...maybe a 25 year old lesbian and I'm on board...
I think it was Lea DeLaria who said, I like penises. Just not on men.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
sex.
Would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the life of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I
remember rightly). They express different ideological agendas.
Whatever lost book you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the life
of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I remember
rightly). They
express different ideological agendas. Whatever lost book you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a
tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical. Nothing is
known or will ever be known about the sexuality of Jesus of Nazareth. But just
supposing it were, it wouldn't upset me in the slightest,
Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking French
poodle.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the
OK, good answer.
You were sounding like a fundie there for awhile,
with your ridiculous bit about organs being designed
for one thing and not the other as a reason to oppose
homosexuality and how homosexuals were all going to
hell.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship
was as thin as a tart's negligee
P.S.: No detective work required, BTW, other than
a quick Google for the exact quote from Clementine's
letter. The nature of the
On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:07 PM, feste37 wrote:I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical. Nothing is known or will ever be known about the sexuality of Jesus of Nazareth. If you had a question, you should ask. Judy makes the
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a tart's negligee P.S.: No "detective work" required, BTW, other than a quick Google for the exact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, good answer.
You were sounding like a fundie there for awhile,
with your ridiculous bit about organs being designed
for one thing and not the other as a reason to oppose
homosexuality and how homosexuals were all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking
French poodle.
While your post brings up some profound points, your language seems
gratutious --far more so than other cited posts.
Now to address your
Actually, foufou, you little French poodle, I don't work hard on any of my
posts.
I don't have a position on oral sex, nor do I intend to develop one. It
doesn't
have any relevance to what I was talking about.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:07 PM, feste37 wrote:
I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a
tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical.
Nothing is known or will ever be known about the sexuality
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship
was as thin as a tart's negligee
P.S.: No
Feste is actually a German word meaning strong or mighty, as in Ein'
feste Burg ist unser Gott (A mighty fortress is our God.)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) No, I do not agree that a poster's moniker detracts from the
content of their post.
ok then, you delightful festing sore,
So it appears that some acts by homosexuals disgust you --though the
same acts done by hetrosexuals are fine. And some homosexual acts you
are indififfent to -- whether homosexuals do them or hetrosexuals.
And some acts lead to hell, but it depends on who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feste is actually a German word meaning strong or mighty,
A strong and mighty what?
And foufou is a french word meaning crazy.
And one of us appears less pretentious than the other.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feste is actually a German word meaning strong or mighty, as
in Ein'
feste Burg ist unser Gott (A mighty fortress is our God.)
FWIW, Feste is also the name of Shakespeare's wisest
Fool, the one who attends King Lear.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Feste is actually a German word meaning strong or mighty, as
in Ein'
feste Burg ist unser Gott (A mighty fortress is our God.)
FWIW, Feste is also
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:10 PM, authfriend wrote:Right: "Vaj, isn't your scholarship as thin as a tart's negligee?" We had the answer to that without your assistance, although you thoughtfully provide additional evidence in your current post. Since Vaj has carefully snipped both what he had
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:17 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" feste37@ wrote: Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@
The bottom line is this:
Two women together: good!
Two men together: somewhat yucky.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as
thin as a
tart's negligee, but the question you ask below
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking
French
poodle.
Be careful.
I asked him whether he was a poodle a few days ago and he took a
dump right on my carpet.
More recently, I've called him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking
French poodle.
While your post brings up some profound points, your language seems
The two that worry me are the laws from Montana and
Oklahoma. There must have been a *reason* that such
laws were created...Where the men are men and the
sheep are nervous, and all that...
Yeah , kind of a Brokeback Mountain thing.
There is nothing in Brokeback
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/22/06 3:33:39 A.M. Central Standard Time,
Oh, Jude, I hate to be the first person to inform you of this, but the
particular
orifice in question was not designed to accommodate that particular
appendage.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, Jude, I hate to be the first person to inform you of this, but
the particular
orifice in question was not designed to accommodate that particular
appendage.
And I hate to inform you that the human brain was not
Obviously I'm failing to grasp the universal appeal of sodomy.
Different parts are designed for different purposes. Do you write using your
toes? Do you open letters with your teeth?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously I'm failing to grasp the universal appeal of sodomy.
So don't engage in it.
Different parts are designed for different purposes. Do you write
using your
toes? Do you open letters with your teeth?
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, Jude, I hate to be the first person to inform you of this,
but the particular orifice in question was not designed to
accommodate that particular appendage.
If you're going to appeal to teleology, at least have the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Oh, Jude, I hate to be the first person to inform you of this,
but the particular orifice in question was not designed to
accommodate that particular
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Oh, Jude, I hate to be the first person to inform you of this,
but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously I'm failing to grasp the universal appeal of sodomy.
Different parts are designed for different purposes. Do you write
using your
toes? Do you open letters with your teeth?
Well, yeah, if you enjoy oddball
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- sparaig wrote:
Why are
so many women into giving oral sex?
You mean unreciprocated oral sex? As opposed
to the serial giving and receiving of pleasure?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by endorsing the
practice of buggery might care to consult The Secret Life of Oscar Wilde
(2005), by Neil McKenna, which provides many details of the disgusting
nature of such acts. After Oscar had his way with the young men who came to
In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was
shocked tofind that feste is a creationist -- or at least an
intelligent design deist pseudo scientist.Or maybe just a
homophobe.
Or maybe just a little more in tune with nature than
Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I
find homophobia such as yours disgusting.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by
endorsing the
practice of buggery might care to consult The Secret
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was shocked tofind that feste is a creationist -- or at least an
intelligent design deist pseudo scientist.
Or maybe just a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was shocked tofind that feste is a creationist -- or at least an
intelligent design deist pseudo scientist.
Or maybe just a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I
find homophobia such as yours disgusting.
What were you doing reading that book, by the way?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Those
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by
endorsing the practice of buggery might care to consult The
Secret Life of Oscar Wilde (2005), by Neil McKenna, which
provides many details of the disgusting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by
endorsing the practice of buggery might care to consult The
Secret Life of Oscar Wilde
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or maybe just a little more in tune with nature than some.
The only thing that kind of spiritual arrogance has to do with
enlightenment is as a barrier to it.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
I read everything. Oscar Wilde is one of my favorite authors. One of my
favorite characters in all literature is Lord Henry Wootton, in Picture of
Dorian
Gray. Lord Henry is a homosexual, but he has some lovely epigrams. What
happened to Oscar was a terrible tragedy.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read everything. Oscar Wilde is one of my favorite authors. One
of my
favorite characters in all literature is Lord Henry Wootton, in
Picture of Dorian
Gray. Lord Henry is a homosexual, but he has some lovely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Ah, there you are quite wrong. I do not believe homosexual anal intercourse
should be made illegal, and certainly should not result in sentences of two
years hard labor, as it did in the case of Oscar Wilde. Nor do I think that
homosexuals should be discriminated against. What people do in the
In a message dated 2/24/06 5:19:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or maybe
just a little more in tune with nature than some.The only thing
that kind of spiritual arrogance has to do withenlightenment is as a
barrier to it.
H isn't that the line , or a
On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:54 PM, feste37 wrote:
But it doesn't mean I have to go
along with the homosexual agenda
What is that, Feste? I mean that sincerely. I have heard about the homosexual agenda for years, as have many others, but have yet to see a single copy of it.
that brainwashes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone has the right to choose their own path to hell.
One can also choose to live in awakened freedom, released from bondage
to concepts of hell and puritanical body shame.
Yahoo! Groups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 5:19:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or maybe just a little more in tune with nature than some.
The only thing that kind of spiritual arrogance has to do with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, there you are quite wrong. I do not believe homosexual anal
intercourse
should be made illegal, and certainly should not result in
sentences of two
years hard labor, as it did in the case of Oscar Wilde. Nor do I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:54 PM, feste37 wrote:
But it doesn't mean I have to go
along with the homosexual agenda
What is that, Feste? I mean that sincerely. I have heard about
the homosexual agenda for years,
In a message dated 2/24/06 6:13:02 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are
you saying? That Judy also molests young men and gives them blow
jobs?
Me? .Never!
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
In a message dated 2/24/06 6:09:19 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everyone has the right to choose their own path to hell. One can
also choose to live in awakened freedom, released from bondageto concepts
of hell and puritanical body shame.
Just like the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, there you are quite wrong. I do not believe homosexual anal
intercourse
should be made illegal, and certainly should not result in
sentences of two
years hard labor, as it did in the case of Oscar Wilde. Nor do I
Thank you. Another one, without quite as much detail but the same sinister, menacing, sneaky, style can be found here:
http://www.ubersite.com/m/26812
Oh, the deviousness of it all.x-tad-bigger
/x-tad-bigger
On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:54 PM, feste37 wrote:
But it doesn't mean I have to go
along with the homosexual agenda
What is that, Feste? I mean that sincerely. I have heard about the
homosexual agenda for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Ah, there you are quite wrong. I do not believe homosexual anal
intercourse
should be made illegal, and certainly should not result in
sentences of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think you would have been on much safer ground to have retorted
to Judy that you weren't a homophobe just because you think that a
certain act is disgusting. After all, homosexual acts don't have
exclusivity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you. Another one, without quite as much detail but the same
sinister, menacing, sneaky, style can be found here:
http://www.ubersite.com/m/26812
Oh, the deviousness of it all.
You betcha! In fact, last
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 6:09:19 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everyone has the right to choose their own path to hell.
One can also choose to live in awakened freedom, released from
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But I have, so keep
up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many of your points. You are right that
to think a particular homosexual practice disgusting does not of itself
constitute homophobia. I do know homosexuals, and I like them. But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
Thank you. Another one, without quite as much detail but the
same
sinister, menacing, sneaky, style can be found here:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many of
your points. You are right that to think a particular homosexual
practice disgusting does not of
All the while, I'm sure, planning on brainwashing everybody you know and blowing up every single house of worship within a 10 mile radius of your home.
Sal
On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Thank
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
I think it interesting that foufou_fl (re:anon_astute_whatever)
really likes all kinds of labeling
JohnY
It doesn't take much to entertain little minds.
Damn, I did it again.
btw,is interesting a label?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2) Anal sex, Do you a man and woman haveing anal anal sex
I'm having a little trouble visualizing this one...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
snip
2) Anal sex, Do you a man and woman haveing anal anal sex
I'm having a little trouble visualizing this one...
Well good, then you are not going
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
snip
2) Anal sex, Do you a man and woman haveing anal anal sex
I'm having a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
snip
2)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
---
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd like a
little more information on the women-under-thirty agenda.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
But if I find
myself
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@
wrote:
snip
2)
Go back and reread the threads that you had with me and Shemp,
and see if they follow focus on ideas and not the person. You used
the same tactics in both threads.
OK.Well do. Sometimes I slip up.
But you may want to re read the shemp posts. I suspect you missed
the point and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go back and reread the threads that you had with me and Shemp,
and see if they follow focus on ideas and not the person. You used
the same tactics in both threads.
OK.Well do. Sometimes I slip up.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd like a
little more information on the women-under-thirty agenda.
I am not sure what agenda means in this context. Perhaps its a joke
-- saying you want in on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johnny, I suspect from your comments that at times your reading or
understanding of some posts is weak or superficial And you react
strongly to your weak understanding, not the post itself -- as
written.
Yes, just joking around. In your last question you asked
(rhetorically) what feste might surmise was the agenda of each of the
groups and it just struck me as funny, because the under 30 group
seemed kind of fun in the limited examples of behavior you offered as
exemplars.
I also enjoyed Judy's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, just joking around. In your last question you asked
(rhetorically) what feste might surmise was the agenda of each of the
groups
Ah, I forgot about that.
and it just struck me as funny, because the under 30
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
Johnny, I suspect from your comments that at times your reading or
understanding of some posts is weak or superficial And you react
strongly
101 - 200 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
