[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Dear Scorpion Meditator; No. For instance our dear, dear moderator of FFL can buy as many as he wishes, so long as he don't have a felony convction again him. But even then felons get guns pretty easy through friends, garage sales and gun show flea markets. Is easy to 'collect' semi-auto

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

A query from Scorpion Nation: When US citizens buy a firearm they have to register the gun, no? Is there some central, federal agency coordinating the sales invoices? What I'm wondering is if a citizen were to buy 20 semi-automatic rifles would anyone in authority be aware that he had

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Well certainly if you buy your firearms legally, it will be evident to someone in the bureau of ATF that you've accumulated quite an arsenal. What, if any follow up they do, I wouldn't know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : But there must be a register of gun

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

But there must be a register of gun ownership surely? Even car owners have their names and addresses linked to their vehicle licence plates (I've seen American cop shows on TV ;-) ). So it can't be difficult to check if someone owns 100 sports cars. Ditto firearms, no? ---In

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

I see ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The requirements to drive and own a car are significantly more stringent than to acquire and possess a firearm. Re: registration requirements... "There is no comprehensive national system of gun registration. In

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Nope, as Americans we are free! Thank the Unified Field we are free! /a.. Some would like to create an application process that might catch mental cases. But we are pretty free to buy guns small and large of most any type. But old history would ask, "what would you do when the Anglican

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Pray! “Lord, here am I! And here are we, together! No one alone can end this killing spree.The powers of death put one against another. Yet you are God and you desire Peace. As mourners, prophets, labourers together, Give us the strength to make the killings cease.” This is a sweet

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Re "The requirements to drive and own a car are significantly more stringent than to acquire and possess a firearm. ": Thanks Emily. Sounds daft to me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The requirements to drive and own a car are significantly

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

The requirements to drive and own a car are significantly more stringent than to acquire and possess a firearm. Re: registration requirements... "There is no comprehensive national system of gun registration. In fact, federal law prohibits the use of the National Instant Criminal

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

It is daft. It is insane. But that's America for you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Re "The requirements to drive and own a car are significantly more stringent than to acquire and possess a firearm. ": Thanks Emily. Sounds daft to me.

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

There is no requirement that law enforcement follow up. However, the reporting requirement for the person/business with the FFL (Federal Firearm License) helps to deter those involved in gun trafficking, among other things. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

*Hope* is not a strategy. From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liber

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

in their inability to feel anything worthwhile), have just gunned down one or more people who are also the "losers". From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 1

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Surely you don't want the person doing the mass killing to *not lose*. From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 11:04 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Ha

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 11:04 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote : Re "The number of mass shootings stopped by armed civilian

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

The FBI defines mass murder as "three or more persons." There are other qualifying criteria. The Congressional Research Service defines it as where four are killed. There can also be distinctions between "mass shootings" and "mass murder." The reality is, imho, is that one's natural

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Re "The number of mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the last three decades is zero": You might be being fooled by this statistic. Think about it: a mass shooting is defined by "Four or more people are actually

[FairfieldLife] Re: You Don't Have to Be Liberal to Understand This

Re "The number of mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the last three decades is zero": You might be being fooled by this statistic. Think about it: a mass shooting is defined by "Four or more people are actually killed, not including the perpetrator". Now imagine: a would-be