--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 6:13 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Ammachi, Shree Maa, Karunamayi, Mirabai, Mother Meera, etc. etc.
> >
> >
> > I will presume that none of these ladies are recluses since you
are
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 6:37 PM, Peter Sutphen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> One thing I should point out is that this is NOT an
> >> absolute in the
> >> TMO. Those of us who received the full A of E
> >> technique also re
on 6/19/05 7:41 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on 6/19/05 10:56 AM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
>>> outside of TM. Do yo
on 6/19/05 7:00 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
>>
>>> There was no AUM in my A of E technique.
>>
>> The full technique has the mantras of the 7 lokas, each
Right like bhu bhuvaha maha janaha tapaha swaha
satyam?
- Original Message -
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
Well there are--but there are four "above" it.On Jun
19
on 6/19/05 6:37 PM, Peter Sutphen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> One thing I should point out is that this is NOT an
>> absolute in the
>> TMO. Those of us who received the full A of E
>> technique also received
>> the mantras of the 7 dimensions and they ALL begin
>> with AUM...
>
> There wa
on 6/19/05 6:13 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ammachi, Shree Maa, Karunamayi, Mirabai, Mother Meera, etc. etc.
>
>
> I will presume that none of these ladies are recluses since you are
> mentioning Ammachi first, and she is clearly not a recluse. Anyway,
> what happens today in
Well, no. As I reported here many months ago, someone had told me the
story behind the Om. The basic moral of the story was that this applied
to this one person in one particular case.
On Jun 19, 2005, at 8:39 PM, sparaig wrote:
> Or perhaps you're assuming that what Gurudev said applied ONLY t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >
> > > However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by Gurudev indicating
> that
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 10:56 AM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> > I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
> > outside of TM. Do you?
>
> No. And I asked Ammachi about it in a public lecture
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by Gurudev indicating
that
> > he believed much the same thing? This would explain where MMY got
the
> > idea...
> >
>
> Yes he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
> outside of TM. Do you?
>
> No, it's patent bullshit and pure TM shell game.
r brilliant revival. Take your pick.
To subscribe, send a me
Well there are--but there are four "above" it.
On Jun 19, 2005, at 8:22 PM, Llundrub wrote:
> I thought there were three vyahrtis. You're not allowed to blow me out
> of the water. Please be kind to me and don't make me look like an
> idiot. ;)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECT
ubject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
Well, in part, as in the the mantras of the triloka... +
4...the vyahrtis.On Jun 19, 2005, at 8:08 PM, Llundrub
wrote:> As in the Gayatri?To subscribe, send
a message to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Or
go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/and
click &#x
--- akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
> >
> > > There was no AUM in my A of E technique.
> >
> > The full technique has the mantras of the 7 lokas,
> each beg
Well, in part, as in the the mantras of the triloka... + 4...the
vyahrtis.
On Jun 19, 2005, at 8:08 PM, Llundrub wrote:
> As in the Gayatri?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups
As in the Gayatri?
- Original Message -
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen
wrote:> There was no AUM in my A of E technique.The f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
>
> > There was no AUM in my A of E technique.
>
> The full technique has the mantras of the 7 lokas, each beginning with
> AUM.
On which course did you receive this?
On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
> There was no AUM in my A of E technique.
The full technique has the mantras of the 7 lokas, each beginning with
AUM.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join
--- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2005, at 4:01 PM, Premanand Paul Mason
> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by
> Gurud
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 2:08 AM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
<[EMAIL PROTECT
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2005, at 4:01 PM, Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> However, didn't Paul Mason
On Jun 19, 2005, at 4:01 PM, Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
>>
>>> However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by Gurudev indicating
> that
>>> he believed much the same thing? Th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by Gurudev indicating
that
> > he believed much the same thing? This would explain where MMY got
the
> > idea...
> >
>
> Yes he
on 6/19/05 2:07 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>> I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
>> outside of TM. Do you?
>
> I believe that that is one of the things he claims is un
on 6/19/05 10:56 AM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
> I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
> outside of TM. Do you?
No. And I asked Ammachi about it in a public lecture and she commented
rather forcefully about it for about 15 minutes (in favor of OM).
I don't do know of any other tradition which
believes this Om thing outside of TM. Do you?No, it's patent bullshit and pure TM
shell game.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yah
On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
> However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by Gurudev indicating that
> he believed much the same thing? This would explain where MMY got the
> idea...
>
Yes he did get it fr. SBS, but M. is generalizing something originally
intended for one woman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
> outside of TM. Do you?
I believe that that is one of the things he claims is unique about TM.
However, didn't Paul Mason post some quotes by Gur
Rick Archer wrote:
>on 6/19/05 2:08 AM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
I'm not sur
Llundrub wrote:
>> Plus advanced
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Sorry, I'm probably confusing some here. In general, mantra shastra
>divides mantras between shakti and shiva mantras. Shakti mantras are
>considered more intense than shiva mantras and therefore usually not
>given to the general public.
Thank you Rick.
I think I will continue to do some practise including Ohm-Mantra. I
really like the effect.
Ingegerd
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 2:08 AM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
on 6/19/05 2:08 AM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
>>>
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
on 6/18/05 11:35 PM, Robert Gimbel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
I remember him saying that since it is an eternal sound and yet can only be chanted intermittently by a human
ti Vardenam
Urvar Ukamikam Bandhinan Mrityur Mookshaya Mamritat Sah Joom Hoom Om.
>
> I'm still standing
>
> Intention is everything.
>
> This is probably why Shiva has been excluded from the TMO.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ingeg
t: Sunday, June 19, 2005 3:00 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
I have a question about Ohm.I got some mantras from one
of MMY Pudits - a Professor in Sanskrit - and the instruction how to use it
- and they contain Ohm. I am meditating TM of course - but when I use the
Mantras with O
As far as ladies not using OM as a mantra, I have read a lot of Vedic
literature and I don't recall any (human) ladies following the recluse path
(although there were certainly some fascinating stories of ladies leading
their husbands to enlightenment like Queen Cuddala does for Sikhidvaja
I have a question about Ohm.
I got some mantras from one of MMY Pudits - a Professor in Sanskrit -
and the instruction how to use it - and they contain Ohm. I am
meditating TM of course - but when I use the Mantras with OHM, they
are very powerful and blissfull - and gives a lot of energy. So wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
> >
OM is the first sound of creation, it contains all the energ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
>
> My understanding is it is associated with the Goddess Kali.
>
> I can see why, Maharishi would say that married women,
>
> should not relate to cl
I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
My understanding is it is associated with the Goddess Kali.
I can see why, Maharishi would say that married women,
should not relate to closely: to the insatiable Kali.
And the sound of Aum,
Is that Universal sound or vibration of C
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Plus advanced
> >
> >
>
> Sorry, I'm probably confusing some here. In general, mantra
shastra
> divides mantras between shakti and shiva mantras. Shakti mantras
are
> considered more intense than shiva
> Plus advanced>
>Sorry, I'm probably confusing some here. In general,
mantra shastra divides mantras between shakti and shiva mantras.
Shakti mantras are considered more intense than shiva mantras and therefore
usually not given to the general public. This is held in a lot of
trad
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > shukra69 wrote:
> >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>TM mantras are m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shukra69" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and Siddha Yoga uses Shiva
> > mantras. Hence why TM'ers live in the heads. Plus advanced
> technique
cardemaister wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>shukra69 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shukra69 wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >>TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and Siddha Yoga uses Shiva
> >>mantras. Hence why TM'ers live in the head
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
