Well let's see. My claim that you're smarter would compel me to suppose that
you know better, and hence would be right about me being equal.
curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "And I couldn't be happier
to discover a group that's smarter than me."
"Equal" is another option
I'll look forward to it, Steve. Wishing you an easy day at work.
lurkernomore20002000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hey Ben,
Good morning to you. I hope you have a fine day. I'm getting ready to go
off to work now. Maybe we'll chat during the day, or perhaps at the end of
the day.
Thank you, Peter. I'm a bit embarrassed to say that I've lost the website link
for learning that focusing technique, if you could send it to me again I'd be
grateful.
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with Curtis here. Use the
term equal. You're
with follow spiritual wayfarers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> mainstream20016@> wrote:
> Warnings to avoid destabilizing one's innocence certainly lay bare the
> fallacy of theory that the prime mover of relative events on a macro
> scale are due to the collect
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben Gilberti wrote:
> And I couldn't be happier to discover a group that's smarter than me.
> That's far more promising and interesting than being
>
> revered by love
I agree with Curtis here. Use the term equal. You're
with follow spiritual wayfarers here. We like to hear
about your experiences, your insights, your
understandings, but when its packaged as an implicit
"teaching" to the unevolved masses, oy vay!
--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hey Ben,
Good morning to you. I hope you have a fine day. I'm getting ready to
go off to work now. Maybe we'll chat during the day, or perhaps at the
end of the day.
Enjoy!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben Gilberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Good morning, Steve.
>
> lurkernomo
Good morning, Steve.
lurkernomore20002000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben
"And I couldn't be happier to discover a group that's smarter than me."
Curtis
"Equal" is another option mate.
Yea, the only thing worse than being preached to, is having to prop someone
up who keeps s
Ben
"And I couldn't be happier to discover a group that's smarter than me."
Curtis
"Equal" is another option mate.
Yea, the only thing worse than being preached to, is having to prop
someone up who keeps saying they're "sorry". I think Ben is going to
have a hard time relating like an eq
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben Gilberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And I couldn't be happier to discover a group that's smarter than me.
That's far more promising and interesting than being
revered by loveable simpletons.
Perhaps for the first time in years I may actually learn somethin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Warnings to avoid destabilizing one's innocence certainly lay bare the
fallacy of theory that the prime mover of relative events on a macro
scale are due to the collective consciousness of group program
generated by such fragile minds.
This is Shakespearian.
___
"And I couldn't be happier to discover a group that's smarter than me."
"Equal" is another option mate.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben Gilberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Peter.
>
> I must say, I'm very glad to have finally come to realize that the
situation is as
Thanks, Peter.
I must say, I'm very glad to have finally come to realize that the situation
is as you've described, though it took me long enough, so that I need persist
in posting things that in this forum are clearly foolish.
And I couldn't be happier to discover a group that's s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ben, I admire that you have hung on here in this forum
> after all the slings and arrows you have taken. But I
> think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned
> people being more "advanced" on this forum.
An opin
Ben, I admire that you have hung on here in this forum
after all the slings and arrows you have taken. But I
think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned
people being more "advanced" on this forum. Most of
us have been deeply immersed in very authentic
spiritual pursuits for decades. Most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2008, at 4:12 PM, feste37 wrote:
>
> > Ben's style is to admit to his errors and then make the same ones all
> > over again in his next post.
>
> Maybe next time around we'll get the Cliff's Notes version
Look, I don't mind you guys having a good laugh at my stupidity,
boorishness, arrogance, or god knows what other flaws that somehow are
all coming into lurid evidence in this particular forum for some reason.
But I've been posting things on internet forums for over 15 years now
and I guess all the
On Jan 23, 2008, at 4:12 PM, feste37 wrote:
Ben's style is to admit to his errors and then make the same ones all
over again in his next post.
Maybe next time around we'll get the Cliff's Notes version. When I
read posts like that, I really start to feel like I must have ADD.
Sal
Ben's style is to admit to his errors and then make the same ones all
over again in his next post.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Ben Gilberti wrote:
>
> > You're right. It was a reckless post and I did indulge in r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben Gilberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're right. It was a reckless post and I did indulge in ranting
and raving. I won't be so thoughtless in the future.
So there is a person behind the writing! Have you ever read William
Farrell's work "Why Men A
On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Ben Gilberti wrote:
You're right. It was a reckless post and I did indulge in ranting
and raving. I won't be so thoughtless in the future.
We'll let it go this time, Ben...
Sal
You're right. It was a reckless post and I did indulge in ranting and raving.
I won't be so thoughtless in the future.
curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Alright, I didn't mean to
rant and rave."
Yes you did, that's what you do. I think this POV was big news when
the Brad
"Alright, I didn't mean to rant and rave."
Yes you did, that's what you do. I think this POV was big news when
the Brady Bunch was on TV. Man bashing is s 70's.
"The male ego is in such a profound state of pathological deformity
that it would rather see the world destroyed than to discover
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben Gilberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>genius, now i realize there is at least one profound intellect in
this group. you sir are marvellous. may we all heal and live and love
in freedom...
>
> Well, as I've been reading the various replies to the sex post
24 matches
Mail list logo
