Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Short on effective force, the Dome group meditation is understaffed by several thousand meditators.. Likewise, The British army is understaffed by several thousand troops. Needing ‘recruits, the Brits look at gen Z and millennials. "We understand the drive they have to succeed and recogn

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

The communal meditating numbers? There are mornings here more recently with 150 or so meditating in the men’s Dome, doing 'program'.. 160 or 170 is common now in the men’s Dome in the mornings. Less than doubling these and roughly you get totals between the Men’s and Women’s Domes. Evenings are

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

LOOK, the peculiar communal hurts we have here with the Dome numbers run over three decades. It serves no good just to get in to editing the old guidelines. The strict preservationist element (the tru-believer) gets too defended in their narrative trying to have discussion, a consideration, even

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Regardless it is okay, the Meissner-like effect is a good enough metaphor for the experience of superradiance where two or more gather in meditation. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The Meissner effect results in a magnetic field being repelled in a superconducting metal.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

The Meissner effect results in a magnetic field being repelled in a superconducting metal. So what is being repelled with meditation? City-Data.com reports that Fairfield has more crime than 67.6% of U.S. cites and other reports indicate Fairfield rates a C+ for crime, 20% higher than the natio

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

1171 messages written in this “The Dome Numbers” FairfieldLife thread? Reading back in to this “Dome Numbers” thread even to before the start of the IA assembly in 2006 the long unsolved problem has been in the written guidelines for membership that have separated, disaffiliated, dissociated

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Nice unity sentiments, but the statistical fact as well as experience of meditators is that both proximity and numbers together meditating effectively matter to the Meissner-like spiritual effect in wellbeing on people. The science well indicates there is a significant benefit to collective med

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

What we are meditating for in the end, is so there is no other, only the Self. Community is nice, but it is a more superficial view. Unity is not created by packing bodies in proximity, it can be done alone, in a cave, or anywhere if you have persistence.  Packing bodies in proximity can have b

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers and Super Storms

Buck, don't be so sure the Settles are behind the move - if Big Bopper Bevan and the others TMO Top Dogs can get the money shifted to the Latin American countries where the financial oversight is harder to achieve than here in the US, Big Bopper and the boys at the top including Girish and the S

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Yep, I must say, this is the most credible statement I've heard re: the benefits of TM :).   From: authfriend To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 5:21 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers   --- In FairfieldLife@yaho

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

"The dome for men is formally known as the "Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome of Pure Knowledge" and the dome for ladies is the "Bagambhrini Golden Dome of Pure Knowledge", but they are commonly called the "Men's Dome" and the "Ladies' Dome". Buildings used for Yogic Flying, such as the Golden Do

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Well, I have lots more posts, so I will say, that the only thing that I consistently note by Judy is that "no one else has ever gotten' into a dispute with Curtis (except Robin, possibly) and therefore, we don't have the kind of "first-person" experience of conversing with him in such a vein."  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

OMGcan you believe this?  Wordsdon't mess with a true editor, and Judy is that, give it up, just give it up.  Or, if you're like me, and tend to stay more big picture, than you end up with "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and "yes" and

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

"You can interpret it however you want. The *fact* is that I happen to be seriously unphotogenic--all the women in my family are--and using a Webcam is the only way I can end up with a photo that actually looks  like me." Baby, geez.  Actually, you posted an absolutely wonderful photo of you here

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

"Now if both you and Curtis read all this, then I hypothesise that nothing or something will happen as a result, and that is not saying anything of course."   I tell ya... you made my hit and miss day with this quotethis is some pretty amusing stuff here.  Don't  mind me though - I'm workin

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:33 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote: She expressed her opinion about selling the magic yogi sandals. Mark was not browbeaten by anything said, he is a tough resilient guy. But here you betray your actual belief about the term bullying which is that a power differential is wh

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Wow...it just gets better and better.  Sesame oil is one of my favorites, I will admit...as is grapeseed oil in salad dressings and of course the artisan's 100% RAW organic coconut oil.    From: Susan To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, Februar

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Feb 29, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Susan wrote: > I missed Sal's goodbye to FFL, or her exit, or however she handled it. Did > she feel driven away? Get sick of the arguing, what? IIRC, she left during the Robin fiasco. She probably just din't have the time to read his encyclicals.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Or you could learn how simple it is to use the Yahoo! advanced search feature, before performing the foot-in-mouth asana! Sent from my iPad On Feb 22, 2012, at 2:33 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > What I would like to know is what kind of life someone has that goes about > actually counting the wo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:06 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote: No, it is a part of all the definitions I read, Websters' for example. Do you think we can't look things up too? bullying The Dictionary built into the Mac gives the following, current definitions, each which emphasizes the power differ

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:45 PM, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" wrote: > > Cyberbullying would be another mischaracterization of Sal's > behavior if you used it for her. The power differential in > this case is flooding social interaction groups with

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On 02/21/2012 08:30 PM, seventhray1 wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey wrote: > >> Now, where did Sunshine Sal run off to? >> I miss her.> > Want my theory? Well here it is anyway. Sal was the subject of some > pretty heavy duty ridicule from Judy. I'm am not even making a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:10 AM, shukra69 wrote: > Rajas are all sweet and humble people doing more than anyone for the > betterment of the world. Gag. Isn't it getting a little lonely on that river in Egypt, shuk? Sal

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 24, 2011, at 8:25 PM, feste37 wrote: > Nothing to do with us-versus-them. It should have been obvious from the > thread that I was referring to the meditating community. You are a very > argumentative poster, Ms. Sal. Name-calling when you don't get agreement? A childish and silly tacti

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut wrote: > > > > > > But Marcos did leave, and that was surely a very positive thing > > > for the Philippines. See, I don't think the Maharishi Effect, > > > if it exists, necessarily always

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 24, 2011, at 7:49 PM, feste37 wrote: > Buck is right. It's the most effective way of letting people know, because > almost everyone goes to Everybody's. Nothing weird about it. Well, if you say so, fest. But what you really mean, I would guess, is, "It's the most effective way of letti

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 24, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Buck wrote: > Om, > you don't live in Fairfield? I live here and I think it's weird. You don't see the non-TM people decorating Hy-Vee like that. > Actually it works pretty good in the community here. > The domes don't serve as a communal place the way they once d

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Rick Archer wrote: >> In memorial, a couple more of us have passed on just recently. Lisa Robb > and Charlie Morenus now. >> >> They died? Recently? Hadn't heard. Didn't see their photos on the > Everybody's door. Don't go to the dome so I can't view the "door of deat

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

-Original Message- From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 5:08 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Rick Archer wrote

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Rick Archer wrote: > In memorial, a couple more of us have passed on just recently. Lisa Robb and > Charlie Morenus now. > > They died? Recently? Hadn’t heard. Didn’t see their photos on the Everybody’s > door. Don’t go to the dome so I can’t view the “door of death

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Buck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 4:30 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers In memorial, a couple more of us have passed on just recently. Lisa Robb and Charli

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > The only time I heard Maharishi voiced a regret, was that due to slack > organizational matters we were not able to go to Cuba, someone made a silly > mistake which prevented us from going there. > Maharishi commented; if we had been able to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:30 AM, blusc0ut wrote: > I've said here before that a great deal of MMY's > teaching ends up in contradiction or paradox or > infinite regress when you take it right down to the > nitty-gritty. "Support of nature," for example, falls > apart in the face of "Unfathomable i

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:30 AM, blusc0ut wrote: As he himself said, many would just make experiences up, or exaggerate whatever experiences they had, amplify them. The Maharishi said that? That's interesting. With rise of the DIY satsang culture, it's now given these same people a venue to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 16, 2011, at 11:05 AM, cardemaister wrote: > "To those who studied the great teachings of S[h]ankara [...] > Buddhistic philosophies looked contemptible. [...] > As S[h]ankara continued his merciless refutation of all hostile > creeds and philosophies, the teachings of the Tatha[a]gata bec

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

That's interesting since everyone from the Patanjali tradition, the Kasmhir Shaivite tradition to the Holy Shankaracharya Order says essentially the opposite. Siddhi cultivation = no enlightenment. Sawry. You do get the drama of rising and falling, which some seem to find very exciting and can't

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 15, 2011, at 4:12 AM, blusc0ut wrote: > The 'purity of the teaching' argument will always be used for the status quo. Actually, I don't know of anyone who uses that phrase or anything like it except for a few TM pseudo-Nazis. Like "blood libel," people generally recognize that it has o

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > I talked to a Purush friend in later 90's who was involved in big hotel > projects, buying, renovating, selling. He described things like this -- the > same patttern. In fact his comment was, "it's great for cultivating > non-attachment

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:29 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > Pretty foolish relying on Mahesh for prognostications. I mean what kind of > > rishi needs to constantly be consulting jyotishis? > > Joke of the week ! > > The Jyotish'jis ran after Maharishi, not the other way around as you wish. I gues

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:56 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > Yeah, communism worked out just great. > > Read the quote again, perhaps it helps. And while we're at it; there has not > been 1 - one - country on this planet which practised cosmmmunism. Ever. In > your naivite you confuse dictatorship wi

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:07 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:39 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers There are points that can be discussed until the face turns blue, particu

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TurquoiseB Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:27 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > > > *From:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto: > FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Joe > *Sent:* Friday, January 14, 2011 11:02 AM > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers > > >

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joe Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:02 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers Bullshit. (unless you were bouncing on a trampoline) If you're not in lotus,

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:54 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:33 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:27 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" wrote: > > Nice Tart, very well said. I agree. Wise and accurate, but also the perfect answer to TM TB fundamentalists who try to drive off people who are re-examining these things on FFL with "Why are

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:46 AM, blusc0ut wrote: > That's 34 years ago, 34 YEARS ! Yet the Turq go on and on about the TMO year after year, post after post even today. And you are still at it, right? Still first stage of flying. People here are talking with other like minded people about their

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:07 PM, emptybill wrote: Humm ... the "measured" (mita) siddhi? In contrast to the unmeasured (amita) siddhi or immeasurable radiance (amitaabha) siddhi? This sounds like Turq's fantasy obsession ... amitalingam siddhi. It's just how the monist tantrics refer to the p

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:47 PM, blusc0ut wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > Why can't the "padme hum's" and others in Fairfield gather somewhere and do their mumbojumbo together ? Because they are not into the mumbojumbo of doing group programs? Or mi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:04 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: Seriously, the question of whether Nabby realizes how crazy he is arises. He really believes that ]he could get "Cooties" from someone performing another style of meditation. You'd think they'd worry about all the people SLEEPING during progra

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 12, 2011, at 3:07 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "TurquoiseB" wrote: >> >> Not to go all metaphysical on your ass while you're >> just having fun or anything, but isn't it fascinating >> that some people's view of the universe they live in >> is of a Big Se

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Buck wrote: > In memorial, > Hada is out today. > > With company of family and friends, awake to the end, > with the Gita, the Puja, chanting, went in to the transcendent > and left. Spectacular Maha-samadhi. > > Jai Don Potts! Wow, that's a shock. What did he die

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 7:09 PM, yifuxero wrote: > Tourette's - very far fetched; Don't go all Judy and Jim on me. I said "Tourette's-like". Didn't you know any Sidhas who had Tourette's-like symptoms?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:37 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > And there are other, more anecdotal examples of an entire > > country that learned to meditate and embrace awakening as > > part of their lives. Not only did strife and war disappear, > > but the healthcare system became an integrated model be

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:37 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > One involves what's come to be called "mirror neurons", which > > are a way we each keep track internally within ourselves of > > how others around us are, how their minds are. The other was > > research on advanced meditators who then were pu

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:10 PM, sparaig wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:28 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > All of this translates into: my gobbledygook belief is better than > > > yours because I say so. > > > > > > Which is fine, but be aw

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 8:41 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > What would you say, Vaj, to the suggestion (not original > with me) that ALL of the myths of the enlightened being > able to positively transform the environment were invented > to sucker people into paying for their lives so that they > didn't have

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:41 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > I would say that both the Patanjali tradition says that and the > Buddhist traditions say that Awakened Mind can transform > environments, indeed whole world systems. What would you say, Vaj, to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:28 PM, sparaig wrote: All of this translates into: my gobbledygook belief is better than yours because I say so. Which is fine, but be aware that you're still spouting gobbledygook beliefs in the eyes (ears?) of most of humanity. There's been on-going research on a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 6:02 PM, jpgillam wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:45 AM, jpgillam wrote: > > > How about Maharishi's notion that simply transcending > > "enlivens" the transcendent for people in the vicinity? Any > > recognition of that ide

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:32 PM, sparaig wrote: > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote: > [...] >> I agree with this more or less. A lot of people >> are like myself, though...came to FF to be part >> of the meditating community, then for various >> reasons stopped going to the D

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:45 PM, yifuxero wrote: > RE: Global connectivity (not with TM)...right Vaj!) in spite of the loose > usage of the word "Global" in the TMO. > There's a lot of connectivity in Buddhism. > > Marcio - you'd be better off getting into Buddhism and its many available > techniqu

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:45 AM, jpgillam wrote: > How about Maharishi's notion that simply transcending > "enlivens" the transcendent for people in the vicinity? Any > recognition of that idea in your tradition? As I pointed out before, IMO the Maharishi's claim, based on his connecting TM with

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:25 PM, sparaig wrote: > Well that's what I'm saying...dishonesty is encouraged. >> What a bunch of hypocrites~~that's their idea of whirled >> peas? >> > > Well, is dishonesty encouraged, or are they simply hiding their heads in the > sand? I have no idea, spare. > I atte

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:32 AM, jpgillam wrote: For that matter, I'd like to hear from anyone about these issues. All of the people who have issues with the TM organization, for example, might want to weigh in with their perspectives and those of their teaching traditions. In many tantric mantra

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:20 AM, cardemaister wrote: > > > > There has been no "peace creating effect" because there is no such thing as the ME. Lovely if there was, but there isn't. > > > FWIW, IMO ME might be something like this: An example from Nature: When a queen ant is spatially separate

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:49 AM, feste37 wrote: > Unfortunately the Movement says inconsistent things about the numbers. I have > just received the University Report, 2009-2010, which in most respects is a > very impressive brochure. However, in the first paragraph of the article on > the IA course,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Jan 5, 2011, at 1:08 PM, jpgillam wrote: 1. Whether there's such a phenomenon as collective consciousness. 2. Whether group meditations have an effect on collective consciousness. 3. Whether there's any relationship between consciousness and activity. 4. Whether TMSP meets the scriptu

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

There has been no "peace creating effect" because there is no such thing as the ME. Lovely if there was, but there isn't. --- On Wed, 1/5/11, feste37 wrote: > From: feste37 > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wednesday, January 5, 2011, 9

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jpgillam Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:44 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers WHAT R the DOME Numbers?

In a message dated 4/3/2008 9:28:13 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Apr 3, 2008, at 4:55 AM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote: Thanks Sal, seems Jeffrey is making the wrong assumptions. He could come and visit and see something else from what he is thinking. It is a re

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Apr 3, 2008, at 4:55 AM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote: Thanks Sal, seems Jeffrey is making the wrong assumptions. He could come and visit and see something else from what he is thinking. It is a really nice place to live. The TMO just is a large neighbor in the neighborhood. Lots going on otherwis

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:48 PM, Jeffrey wrote: Hi Sal, you may be perfectly happy, and that's good for you. But so many people seem to complain endlessly about the injustice and unfairness within the community, yadda yadda. And generally they make good points. I am not saying that you should be mise

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

On Apr 2, 2008, at 7:57 PM, Jeffrey wrote: Doug, you make many good points about the dogmatism and the accepted bad behaviors of the TM Movement. What I can't understand is why so many people stay in a situation where there is so little respect and concern for them as indidviduals, and where the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

> but Settle was > apparently wondering why > people who are not required to be in the domes are > not attending even > when it is fee-free My point is they are not attending for all the same reasons that the ones who are forced to attend would not attend if they could get away with it. We us

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

Many, if not most, dome-goers attend program only because they are virtually forced to. For CCP, it meant show up regularly or face a humiliating trip to the course office to explain why you are not regular. For students, it meant miss a minimal number of programs or fail. I cn't imagine what the