Share tries her hardest to create confusion:
> Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
> have as much time as usual to
> read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example
> she gave.
No, I gave no "example," Share. Rather, I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used
qualifiers in the example she gave.
What I mainly remember is how she initially respo
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used
qualifiers in the example she gave.
What I mainly remember is how she initially responded and how she continues to
write to and about me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this
laughing at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out. I was
pulling a
It grows on trees, too! Thanks!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
"Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not
Well, I couldn't figure out my question either. Let me rephrase: "Share, do
you agree that Judy *did* include qualifiers, including the one you
specifically mention (sounds like) in the section of said post below that I
have copied to this one?"
Share, this is a yes/no question. I won't t
Junior year is tough; I've got a junior also. It's decision time - maybe.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Well, I hope this is okay to say, but I think it may make it easier to have
onsite two parent input. Right now the 20 year old is listing somewhat in his
junior year. (I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
"Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not tracking this, either...its a
little out there, frankly. Do you mean actual rain, l
Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this laughing
at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out. I was pulling a
fast one on Share, but I am sure that she will exercise those traits that Feste
mentionedacceptance, forgiveness, letting goand le
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
"Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not tracking this, either...its a
little out there, frankly. Do you mean actual rain, like rain-rain, composed of
water, wet, droplets, an
Oh, I'd forgotten about this one.
Barry ordered:
> STOP be a codependent in all of this. YOU can stop it all by just
cutting them out of your life.
Ann commented:
> Says Barry in an attempt to fan the flames. Oh, how fun is this Barry? Just
> up your particular alley. You are such a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote:
>
> I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time
now though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie
Robertson. Here is a se
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I
think about music.
Amazing what a simple comma placement can accomplish.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote:
O.K. Share, l
Emily, if you'll forgive me, I can't figure out what this question means; I
wouldn't blame Share if she couldn't either:
Emily wrote:
> Here is a second question for you: "How to you remember the posts that Judy
> wrote differently than she
> wrote them?" No, this is not a setup. I am
I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time now
though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie Robertson. Here
is a second question for you: "How to you remember the posts that Judy wrote
differently than she wrote them?" No, this is not a setup. I am g
Er, Share, she's parodying you (and Barry). And very aptly, too. Can you laugh
at yourself? No, of course not. Neither can Barry.
Share upchucks:
> Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote:
Conversation between Share and Em
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I
think about music.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: "What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some interesting posts..."
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: "What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some interesting posts..."
Share: What posts of mine did you used to find interesting?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December
You misunderstand. I meant that Ann is not involved in the situation, not you.
By kind of nuts, I mean your relentless obsession with small, unimportant
details, your inability to let go of anything in the way that a normal person
would. Quite frankly, you often sound like a patient in a me
Correction: "To ask her to do that is a waste of my time currently. Maybe
later."
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
criticism, it is
Isn't that incredible? Looks like Share's defenders had the shit scared out of
them by my post documenting her untruthfulness. There's no possible rebuttal,
and they can't admit even that she "misremembered," so they're frantically
standing on their heads and wiggling their ears trying to save h
Feste sputtered:
> Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what
> you think they ought to say.
> You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation: you are right and
> everyone must acknowledge how
> right you are and how wrong your dishonest opponents ar
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
criticism, it is simply a fact based on hundreds of examples she has provided
in black and white. To ask her to do that is a waste of time. It has *n
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what you
think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation:
you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right you are and how wrong
your dishonest opponents are. They are disreputable human being
24 matches
Mail list logo