One of the swimmers, it turns out, has now admitted the robbery story was
false.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hey! what's the *derogatory term for *Brazilian*?
From: vox_9
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:45 AM
Subject:
Ugly Americans.
Ptui.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Must be the guy in jail,
He wants out.
I think they lied and embarrassed the host nation and their own.
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, Augus
Um, no. Lochte lied to both his mother and the police, saying he and three
other swimmers had been victims of an armed robbery. That wasn't true, and a
police investigation proved that he lied.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sounds like Lochte told his mom a different st
The swimmers gave the money to the manager of the gas station, not the security
guards.
The security guards had called the police and were holding the swimmers until
they arrived, but the swimmers managed to leave before the police got there. If
they thought they were being extorted (for all
http://www.salon.com/2016/08/19/medical-mudslinging-right-wingers-reach-a-new-low-with-their-smears-about-hillarys-health/
http://www.salon.com/2016/08/19/medical-mudslinging-right-wingers-reach-a-new-low-with-their-smears-about-hillarys-health/
http://www.snopes.com/clintons-secret-service-
Oh, PLEASE. She's obviously looking at something happening in front of her, in
the audience, apparently some protesters. You can hear one of them shrieking.
She's wondering whether she needs to do or say anything about it. Then the guy
comes up to reassure her that she doesn't need to be concern
I don't know which is worse, the folks who are so stupid they believe this
crap, or the folks who are too smart to believe it but push it anyway.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No, it's not scary. That's not what she does at all. This
Hillary-has-brain-problem meme is j
I suppose so. But it isn't even stupidity so much. People have a kind of
learned helplessness; they don't want to make the effort to think for
themselves, ask themselves if such-and-such awful story makes sense, maybe even
do a little research. They want someone to tell them what to think, and t
Isn't 1786 a *little* far back to be reaching for reasons to justify hating
Muslims, Doug?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
1786
White Slavery in the Mediterranean.
The slave kingdoms of North Africa and the Barbary terrorism, March 1786.
“America’s two main dipl
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/nyregion/2-killings-near-mosque-plunge-a-queens-neighborhood-into-fear.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/nyregion/2-killings-near-mosque-plunge-a-queens-neighborhood-into-fear.html
From the article:
...A day earlier, the imam and his assistant at Mr.
It's obvious to anyone with a brain. It's obvious to *you*, Mike. But you'd
rather look stupid in the hope that you can get some *really* stupid people to
think she did "go blank."
Contemptible.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yeah, yeah... that's the ticket! She got
Well, it's interesting that a post ostensibly about "America’s deep spiritual
sense of [spiritual] value about ‘inalienable’ rights" quotes only the
conflicting perspective.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No, a relevant note of perspective in that quote is America’s deep
I don't believe that's what you think. As I said, you aren't stupid, and it's
quite strikingly, blindingly obvious from the video that something disruptive
was happening in the audience in front of her; that's what she's looking at.
And when she starts to speak again, after her security people h
The Clintons are *not* liars, in fact. The "notoriety" is a function of decades
of lies about them from the right wing.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yes, the Clinton's are very smooth talkers. I think that comes with training
as lawyers, like knowing what the meaning o
It began in earnest when Clinton was elected president, of course, and reached
back into the '80s to Whitewater. It wasn't (isn't) all that "vast," but it was
intense and determined to bring down the Clintons. Ever heard of the Arkansas
Project of Richard Mellon Scaife?
---In FairfieldL
To refresh your memory:
https://www.texasobserver.org/777-the-arkansas-project-unmasked/
https://www.texasobserver.org/777-the-arkansas-project-unmasked/
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It began in earnest when Clinton was elected president, of course, and rea
Ollie, Doug has been saying Bevan was forced out. JamesAlan believes Bevan's
retirement was entirely voluntary.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
from about two months ago...
http://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/education/higher-education/new-president-named-for-mahari
Fantasy Hour with Bhairitu:
And I think Trump will win because Hillary is showing up as a really weak
candidate growing weaker every week. I the Dems wanted the White House again
they should have made sure that Bernie got the nomination. Problem? Bernie
not big on the status quo
Not a shill. Check Mr. Dictionary.
Just an informed voter who doesn't engage in silly fantasies.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
So sez the Hillary shill.:-D
On 08/21/2016 04:15 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Fantasy Hour with Bh
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The Clinton campaign must be in a state of shock today.
You mean, because she's up by 5.5? (snicker)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Throw out the fake USC/LA Times "Poll" and her lead jumps to 6.8 points.
Well, it isn't a "fake" poll, just a different methodology. HuffPo doesn't
include it in their averages, but RCP does (that's the 5.5 spread as of today).
Here, HuffPo'
Sure has fouled up your mind (not that there was much of it to be fouled up).
Ollie and I just got done "reacting to" this poll. I guess you're not reading
anything that doesn't confirm what you want to believe, huh?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Polls, polls, polls.
Oh, and I just noticed, your silly article is from yet another Russian source,
Sputniknews.com (run by the Russian government).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sure has fouled up your mind (not that there was much of it to be fouled up).
Ollie and I just got done "reacting to" t
Let's not forget, folks, that JamesAlan has a history of creating his own
evidence-less narratives out of whole cloth. Pretty funny to see him
criticizing someone else for the same thing.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I
And by the way, you claim you aren't voting for either Hillary or Trump, but
you're doing your level best to tear Hillary down, which of course helps Trump,
whether you vote for him or not. So your pose of neutrality doesn't really hold
up to examination.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups
What utter balderash. Yes, it's good to know what the Russians are saying. But
it's not at all smart to take their word for anything. The article you posted
from Sputniknews is absurd on its face; anybody who knows anything about polls
should be able to recognize that. But you swallowed it whole
You really have nothing to say except nonsense, do you?
No, the election wasn't stolen from Bernie. He lost because the voters
preferred Hillary. Duh.
There was NO evidence Bernie could have beaten Trump and a lot of evidence
that he couldn't.
Hillary is in excellent health, not at all
You've been defending the article, toots.
So when are you going to adapt to 2016?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Didn't say I "swallowed it". I put the article up for discussion and it is
getting discussed! Psst! It isn't the 1950s anymore. :-D
On 08/23/2016 09:41
So LAME.
I don't know where you got stuck, but you really need to get up to speed on
U.S.-Russia relations.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Here, wouldn't want you to miss your favorite TV show:
https://youtu.be/4wPgRlASoGA https://youtu.be/4wPgRlASoGA
On 08/23/2
Even LAMER.
They're all facts, toots, not mantras. Sorry you find them so upsetting.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Perhaps if you repeat these as mantras 108 million times they might become
true! :-D
On 08/23/2016 10:07 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [
New York Times’s Moscow Bureau Was Targeted by Hackers
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/technology/new-york-timess-moscow-bureau-was-targeted-by-hackers.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/technology/new-york-timess-moscow-bureau-was-targeted-by-hackers.html
New York Times’s Moscow
Huh??
I have no idea what you're asking about.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
So where does Judy fit in with all of this?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-the-exclusive-events-helping-to-fund-clinton-and-the-democratic-party/2016/08/23/f8ef52d4-6926-11e
P.S.: But I will point out how amusing it is that you yap and yap and yap about
how biased the mainstream media is toward Clinton, and then link to this
article from the Washington Post, no less, that snidely paints her as an
elitist hypocrite.
Now that Barry is safely tucked away in his prot
And by the way, she has nothing to explain unless and until some evidence
emerges of actual corruption or pay-to-play. So far...zilch.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary
Clinton while she was secretary of
Hillary Health Shocker!
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/hillary-health-shocker.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/hillary-health-shocker.html
Hillary Health Shocker!
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/hillary-health-shocker.html Google
and Twitter never lie
Wow, you are so out of it. You made that up about my regarding the mainstream
media as the "bastion of truth." I've never suggested such a thing.
I *have* said that you're quite egregiously wrong to think the mainstream
media is all steadfastly behind Clinton. This WaPo article is an excellent
I'm quite sure that Willytex knows the "slush fund" story has been extensively
debunked. It's a typical right-wing deliberate lie that he's passing on even
though he knows it isn't true.
Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-mon
From the Charity Navigator Web site:
Charity Navigator: We had previously evaluated this organization, but have
since determined that this charity’s atypical business model can not be
accurately captured in our current rating methodology. Our removal of The
Clinton Foundation from our site i
Bernie Sanders' new group is already in turmoil
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/bernie-sanders-group-turmoil-227297
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/bernie-sanders-group-turmoil-227297
Bernie Sanders' new group is already in turmoil
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/bernie-
Wall Street Journal: "Corporate donations to politically connected charities
aren't illegal so long as they aren't in exchange for favors. There is no
evidence of that with the Clinton Foundation. [...] All of the companies
mentioned in this article said their charitable donations had nothing to
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/08/yes-politics-sort-grubby-business
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/08/yes-politics-sort-grubby-business
Excerpt:
I've been genuinely confused about the whole Foundationgate thing. Did big
donors to the Clinton Foundation get extra sp
John, your link doesn't work. I think it must have been to an earlier article
that was taken down because it wasn't clear. Here's a link to a revised article
that is clear as crystal about what the payment is for. No need to investigate!
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-paid-dollar13-billi
Excellent, thoughtful article from Alternet. (Bhairitu, note especially #6.)
7 of the Less-Noted But Still Very Sexist Attacks on Hillary Clinton
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/7-less-noted-still-very-sexist-attacks-hillary-clinton
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/7-less-
Unfortunately, Mike, unlike with Trump, there is NO EVIDENCE that Hillary is
anything but a "good guy." So you're just flapping your gums.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Nobody gives a damn about how Trump conducted business years ago. He was a
business man, taking advan
Provide EVIDENCE that she lied or did something corrupt or illegal, or keep it
shut.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Nixon or his secretary erased 18 minutes of a tape which was evidence against
him.
Hillary purposefully deleted and wiped an unlawful server of over 30,0
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Really? Not very in depth investigation about rigged elections but just a
guess.
I guess you didn't notice the writer had a bunch of different things to cover.
She made the necessary points, though: the whole primary voting system has been
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/25/2016 09:50 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
How's the status quo working out for you, toot
You know, when you're so hopelessly out of arguments that you have to resort to
accusing supporters of the candidate you oppose of being paid shills, you
should just go away and shut up rather than expose what bad shape you're in.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In Fai
No, no, no, John, it wasn't a "ransom payment." That's a right-wing lie you've
picked up. If anything, it was the *reverse* of a ransom--the U.S. didn't give
Iran the money we owed them (that we had withheld from the arms sale 30 years
ago) until Iran had released the prisoners and they were on
Not sure why you think you're going to get away with repeating Barry's lie,
Bhairitu. It sure makes you look bad.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/25/2016 10:34 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups
Gee, too bad there's no evidence of corruption, isn't it?
And too bad the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street
Journal (!) have all said there was no evidence of conflict of interest.
FWIW, Arkansas Online is the Web version of the right-wing Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette,
Evidence? Bhairitu don't need no steenkin' evidence.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On Aug 25, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@...
[FairfieldLife] mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
No, you got it backwards. She isn't supporting me, I'
Show us the evidence that I would "just move on instead of being adamant."
You know as well as everyone else here that I'm famous for sticking with an
argument until the other guy gives up.
OOOPSIE!!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/25/2016 12:20 PM, S
I didn't say they were "wrong." They didn't make any actual claims; how could
they? There's no evidence she did anything corrupt.
No, they're satisfied with heaps of nasty innuendo. That's how the right wing
operates.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/25/2016 12
Hillary didn't "steal the primary from Bernie." He lost it because not enough
people voted for him. Sorry about that!
Because you get a big kick out of expressing your hatefulness.
(Plus which, you're fiddling with the software again. You have made several
posts now where clicking "Show message history" doesn't reveal what's in the
original post. Very clever.)
Nope. No evidence.
Are you beginning to see a *trend* here?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/25/2016 03:53 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Hillary didn't "steal the primary from Bernie." He lost it because not
enough people v
Barry never figured out that the more he lied, the less credibility he had
(duh). Bhairitu is facing the same problem now that he's started lying up a
storm. (Not that he had a lot of credibility to begin with.)
Or, I don't know, maybe Barry finally *did* realize what he'd done to his
credibi
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hillary followers don't even know what she was talking about:
Not until she explained it in her speech. It's about time everyone became
aware of it. But the alt-right's bigoted thinking is so foreign to the decent
people who support Hillary
Whoops, another bad link, John.
This is probably the same article, which MSN reprinted:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/293408-trump-claims-ignorance-on-alt-right-movement
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/293408-trump-claims-ignorance-on-alt-right-movement
Of course you can. We have free speech in this country.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It appears that you can call anyone you dislike as a member of the alt-right.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hillary followers don't even know what she was
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
What if the polls are biased against Trump?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/are-the-polls-biased-against-trump/article/2003969
http://www.weeklystandard.com/are-the-polls-biased-against-trump/article/2003969
Excerpt:
"It is just not ri
However, what Hillary's been saying about Trump is true and evidence-based.
What Trump has been saying about Hillary is not true, and there isn't a shred
of evidence for it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It's a common technique by politicians to negatively label
I first started seeing it several weeks ago; at the time, it was new to me. But
it's been around for quite some time.
No, of course I'm not an "expert" on it, but obviously I read more widely than
you guys do, so I do know more about it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
And neither does HuffPro because Clinton didn't mention White Supremacist
sites.
You mean "HuffPo."
Yup. Just a typo.
Of course they know what it is. What a silly thing to say!
Not according to that article. Ooops,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/26/2016 02:55 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
(snip)
And neither does HuffPro because Cli
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/26/2016 04:29 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
On 08/26/2016 02:55 PM, authfriend@... mailt
This link doesn't go to anything about Clinton's calendar.
Bhairitu, go take a nice long rest. You're losing it big-time.
Here's a link that works:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-clinton-calendars-wont-released-until-election-232042336--election.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-clint
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/26/2016 07:09 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
On 08/26/2016 04:29 PM, authfriend@... mailt
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/26/2016 07:23 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
This link doesn't go to anything about Clinton's calendar.
Link works and was tested here before posting. What browser are you using?
Ha ha ha. Chr
My link does. His link doesn't.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Oooopsie!
The link works and goes to the AP story about Clinton's calendar. Talk about
losing it big time and needing a rest.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
This link doesn't go to a
I use the Chrome browser. My link works, his doesn't. You've got the links
mixed up.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
His link works just fine on my Chromebook. Try another Windows web browser.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My link does. His link doesn't.
Pathetic. He's unable to cite a single actual lie. Just differences of opinon
and semantics.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Fact-Check -- Top 20 Lies in Hillary's 'Alt-Right' Speech
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/26/blue-state-blues-fact-check-top-20-l
Oopsie, no, the link goes to the map of the U.S. shown below, not the
Clinton story.
Funny how you keep getting this wrong, isn't it? Especially when you post the
actual evidence that you're wrong and still claim you're right.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ooo
And Bill Clinton (14 years ago) promptly put her down. Yep, that's conclusive
evidence that Hillary is in league with the alt-left just like Trump is in
league with the alt-right, isn't it?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Even more ironic, the Alt-Left supports Clinton.
Correction: 24 years ago. Even better!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
And Bill Clinton (14 years ago) promptly put her down. Yep, that's conclusive
evidence that Hillary is in league with the alt-left just like Trump is in
league with the alt-right, isn't it?
--
http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/03/khizr-khans-connections/
http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/03/khizr-khans-connections/
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sorta like the Republicans used Pat Smith, mother of Sean Smith, killed in the
Benghazi attack; and Kent Terry and Kelly Terry-Willis, siblings of Brian
Terry, Border Patrol agent killed in Operation Fast and Furious, speakers at
the Republican Convention, huh?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoo
Oh, gee, and how could I forget the three mothers whose children were killed by
illegal immigrants?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sorta like the Republicans used Pat Smith, mother of Sean Smith, killed in the
Benghazi attack; and Kent Terry and Kelly Terry-Willis, sibli
From the article:
Despite Coulter’s claim, Khan previously told CNN’s Anderson Cooper, “I do not
stand for any Sharia law because there is no such thing.”
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann Coulter on Khizr Khan: ‘We’re all going to be living under Sharia law if
Such a horrible human being, if you can even call Coulter a human being.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Another media zero gesturing frantically for attention - one of an endless
parade of awkward contortionists and GOP court jesters, trying to justify
Trump's childish a
Anybody who thinks Hillary is "crooked" is delusionary to start with.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Who could possibly take him seriously? This bankrupt, foul mouthed golf course
developer, with no government experience, as leader of the United States? NFW -
No Way.
A
Anybody who thinks Hillary is "crooked" is delusionary to start with.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
"The bright line seems to be outright bribery. Anything short of that is
considered — not just for the Clintons, for everyone — acceptable corruption."
A compulsion fo
HAHAHAHAHAHA! Talk about a river in Egypt!
No, of course "alt-right" wasn't a term made up by the Clinton campaign. The
term has been around since at least 2008:
In November 2008, Paul Gottfried https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Gottfried
addressed the H. L. Mencken Club about what he cal
Let me try to explain this so you can understand (but your brains are so
scrambled at this point I'm not sure you'll be able to).
Alt-right and alternative media have nothing to do with each other. That's the
first thing you need to have drilled into your noggin. I don't know where you
got th
If you were a decent human being, you'd thank me for going to the trouble of
setting you straight rather than dump on me for correcting you.
Here's another little primer for you, this one from the ADL:
Alt Right: A Primer about the New White Supremacy
http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/dom
Bhairitu, you aren't going to win this one. Anyone who's paying attention will
see that you're badly wrong, and will form a pretty low opinion of your
character and your credibility because you simply can't bring yourself to admit
it.
What on earth happened in your childhood to make it so dif
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
For your entertainment.
Dean Henderson is a liberal blogger and author. Friday night he was
interviewed by Jeff Rense (who entertains a variety of opinions unlike
narrow minded Clinton supporters).
Opinions like conspiracy theories and
Just as I said, no hands-and-knees pose in the Sun Salutation. (And yes, I've
practiced plenty of yoga asanas, including the Sun Salutation.)
Neither you nor Bhairitu seem to understand that repeating a mistake over and
over doesn't somehow make it not a mistake.
---In FairfieldLife@
KKK Endorses Hillary Clinton? Not Likely.
http://www.snopes.com/kkk-endorses-hillary-clinton/
http://www.snopes.com/kkk-endorses-hillary-clinton/
KKK Endorses Hillary Clinton? Not Likely.
http://www.snopes.com/kkk-endorses-hillary-clinton/ It's highly improbable that
a Ku Klux Klan leade
I believe he's saying Abedin has had enough of her husband sexting other women.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Are you saying that Huma Abedin prefers Hillary?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Perhaps the TMO should send a representative from Mother Divine
I believe he's saying Abedin has had enough of her husband sexting other women.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/uploads/2014/06/bill-clinton-weiner.jpg
http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/uploads/2014/06/b
No, I didn't leave out a pose. No, I didn't pray to the Sun God. No, I didn't
have a poor teacher. No, the whole point of the Sun Salutation is not to get
down on your hands and knees.
In fact, there is no hands-and-knees pose in the Sun Salutation.
(The three photos at your link are entir
And now Doug can claim that the fact that you're disagreeing with him is proof
of his contention that it's "a difficult day to substantially engage others."
;-)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Thanks, but your post just now, at close to the speed of light, spread
global
Oh, and by the way:
A Powerful Russian Weapon: The Spread of False Stories
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/29/world/europe/russia-sweden-disinformation.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/29/world/europe/russia-sweden-disinformation.html
A Powerful Russian Weapon: The Spread of False
Uh-huh. As you know, Step Six isn't what anybody sane would think of as
"getting down on your hands and knees." There are no such poses in the Sun
Salutation.
Nor is Step Six "the whole point of the exercise." The whole point of the Sun
Salutation is the sequence of all 12 poses.
Neither
This comment is growing whiskers, Mike.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Allahu akbar!
From: vox_9
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 1:57 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi's Yoga Asanas
Mahesh Yogi formulated a six m
FYI, Doug, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, "meditationist" means
"person who writes meditations."
Also, just for the record, the fact that we have tides doesn't validate the
notion of "vibrational influence of the heavenly bodies on subtle systems of
the human being." What the tid
Neither Sri Sri nor Maharishi would be happy with your attempt to distort and
demean the Sun Salutation by pretending it's about "getting down on your hands
and knees." Other yogis would just laugh at you as a clueless Westerner.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Any sa
Neither Sri Sri nor Maharishi would be happy with your attempt to distort and
demean the Sun Salutation by pretending it's about "getting down on your hands
and knees." Other yogis would just laugh at you as a clueless Westerner.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sun
501 - 600 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
