On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 04:28 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> 2. let's make a mock 0.5 release so we don't have any confusion over
> outstanding problems and test out that release before we deploy to the
> buildsys.
Whenever the trigger gets pulled, push the new mock packages through the
buildsys and I'l
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 16:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Have you tried it with plague? If not, I'll put your version
> > on my local plague server and see if it causes any grief
> > (don't expect it to).
>
> I did not see an *easy* way to set up a plague server, so we do not have
> one,
Hi,
I checked in the last bits for builder-initiated communication earlier
this week to cvs HEAD. This means that builder instances no longer have
to run _any_ server (XML-RPC, HTTP, or otherwise), and that builders can
be behind a firewall without problems. I call these "Active" builders,
as th
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The file glob for debuginfo packages should be "*-debuginfo-*" since
> the debuginfo rpms are called
>
> %{name}-debuginfo-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm
>
> and not:
>
> *.debuginfo.rpm
Thanks, committed to stable and HEAD.
D
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 14:10 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The ChangeLog doesn't cover this, but there is no BuildJob.py or
> buildjob.py anymore.
>
> Hence references to "BuildJob" objects should be called "PackageJob"
> to avoid confusion.
>
> In particular, in server/Repo.py it should be:
>
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 16:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:00:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Currently, when we sign and push built packages, we move them out of a
> > "repodir" while the build server may be copying new packages to that
> > directory.
> >
> > We
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 16:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:00:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Currently, when we sign and push built packages, we move them out of a
> > "repodir" while the build server may be copying new packages to that
> > directory.
> >
> > We
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 22:42 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 12:38:40 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Patch is applied to the Extras buildsys build server now too, so feel
> > free to use the lockfile stuff in scripts and whatever on extras64.
>
> Gr
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 14:32 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.06.2006, 12:45 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > I think this just broke two build jobs:
>
> Well, we had similar problems before and even opened a bug report to
> track it (but it got forgotten):
> https://bugzi
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 14:39 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oliver Falk wrote:
> > Hi Clark!
> >
> >
>
> Hi back Oliver!
>
> >
> > Thx for letting us know about your progress, Clark!
> >
> > Best would be you send a patch/diff to the list - firs
ms
> > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:44 AM
> > To: Discussion of Fedora build system
> > Subject: Re: New version of mock working (I think)
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > &
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 16:19 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Clark Williams
> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 4:07 PM
> > To: Discussion of Fedora build system
> > Subject: Re: New version of mo
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 19:01 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Perhaps I've been a bit overengineering this. Do we really need a full
> xml-rpc just to report status? After talking to our team, and seeing
> Mike's post, perhaps dumping to an xml file (with locking) is a saner
> solution and easier to
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 11:15 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mike McLean wrote:
> > Clark Williams wrote:
> >> Not smart enough to argue that we should wait for our build system
> >> clients to weigh in. Sigh...
> >>
> >> Dan/Jeremy/Mike/Andreas/et
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem *not* being able to build 'i686' packages (i.e.
> optional_arches=i686) anymore *after* having upgraded our plague
> server/builder (Opteron x86_64) a couple of weeks ago from
> plague-0.4.3 to *plague-0.5.0*. Th
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem *not* being able to build 'i686' packages (i.e.
> optional_arches=i686) anymore *after* having upgraded our plague
> server/builder (Opteron x86_64) a couple of weeks ago from
> plague-0.4.3 to *plague-0.5.0*. Th
s trying to make life simpler for you. My bad.
> For the good news (for me anyway), I'm also trying to learn Python
> (Diving Into Python) on my own time, so that hopefully one day I might
> be able help squash some of these bugs.. However, in the meantime,
> I/we very much appreciat
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:18 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/16/2006 10:41:55 AM:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:48 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Dan.
> > >
> > > So I ran
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:49 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> DW> and on the server, which has _no_ architecture at all, you'd have
> DW> in /etc/plague/server/targets:
> DW>
> DW> fedora-devel-core.cfg
> DW> fedora-5-core.cfg
> DW> fedora-4-core.cfg
> DW> fedora-devel-extras.cfg
> DW> fedora-5-extras.cf
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 13:09 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/19/2006 10:07:54 AM:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:49 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > > DW> and on the server, which has _no_ architecture at all, you'd
t; plague-0.4.3 to *plague-0.5.0*. The problem happens only with i686
> >> (optional_arches=i686) -- not with i386 (base_arches=i386) which
> >> continues to work flawlessly.
>
> > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/19/2006 02:07:05 PM:
> > Ok,
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 12:00 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hey all
>
> the attached patch adds support for Suns niagara arch to plague.
Committed to HEAD, thanks. How's 0.5 working out for you so far?
Dan
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redh
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 17:21 -0700, Al Pacifico wrote:
> I have fifteen CPAN packages that I'm packaging as
> RPMs for FC5, and one (and just one) of them seems to
> hang mock (mock-0.6-4.fc5). All of them check out with
> rpmlint and all build using rpmbuild. All SRPMs except
> 'perl-DBIx-Migration
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 16:50 -0700, John Villalovos wrote:
> Has anyone done any work using Mock with SuSE Linux Enterprise
> Desktop? We are working on a project where we need to build RPMS for
> Fedora, RHEL, SLED, and maybe OpenSuSE.
People have done this, yes. I believe only a few modificatio
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dan Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > As I see you've figured out, it should be fixed now. Server-side issue
> > with some database fields being way too small. They are larger now :)
>
> Yes,
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dan Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > As I see you've figured out, it should be fixed now. Server-side issue
> > with some database fields being way too small. They are larger now :)
>
> Yes,
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 02:01 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone ever seen a yum/depsolve-related error like this before in
> their *plague-0.5.0* build environment, and then tried *killing* the
> job that had caused it? This was problem three of three which I had
> mentioned in my
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 07:39 -0500, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/30/2006 03:53:13 PM:
>
> > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 02:01 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Has anyone ever seen a yum
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 22:36 -0800, Evan Klitzke wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have been trying to get plague working. I have installed the plague
> programs that come with Fedora Core 6 (4.4.1). When running
> plague-server, I get the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ plague-server
> Us
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 10:19 -0500, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Does anyone know what happened to the following *plague-0.5.0*
> programs?
>
> File: ExtrasMultiLib.py Status: Entry Invalid
> File: ExtrasPushUtils.pyStatus: Entry Invalid
> File: extras-push-new Status: Entry
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:32 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone ever seen this error before in their *plague-0.5.0* build
> environment? It surfaced last week shortly after we started
> stress-testing our buildsystem. In fact, there were three such
> errors in all, which I will p
mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Index: ChangeLog
=======
RCS file: /cvs/fedora/extras-buildsys/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.212
diff -u -r1.212 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 31 Oct 2006 16:46:20 - 1.212
+++ ChangeLog 31 Oct 2006
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 01:11 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone ever seen this error before in their *plague-0.5.0* build
> environment? This is error two of three, which I mentioned in my
> previous post. It too surfaced last week shortly after we started
> stress-testing our bu
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 23:48 -0500, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> PROBLEM # 1 Depsolve step keeps crashing due to a typo in
> the script:
>
> 364 (fuse-sshfs): Starting depsolve for arches: ['x86_64', 'i386'].
> Exception in thread PackageJob: 364/fuse-sshfs:
> [...snip...]
> > File "/us
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 13:39 +0100, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the correct Fedora mailinglist, but has anyone
> had a look at the OpenSuSe Build Service pages (
> http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service )?
>
> There are two presentations (from FOSDEM) about it and it seem
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 10:09 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 09:32, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> > The projects seem to solve similar problems.
>
> I think the major point here is that plague is open source, and all our
> rpms/srpms are freely available. You can setup your o
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 22:43 -0500, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Dan Williams wrote on 11/13/2006 03:26:58 PM:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 23:48 -0500, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > >
> > > PROBLEM # 1 Depsolve step keeps crashing due to a typo
> in
> > &g
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:28 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 13:39 +0100, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is the correct Fedora mailinglist, but has anyone
> > had a look at the OpenSuSe Build Service pages (
> >
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 18:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> $ plague-client list
> Error: an error ocurred communicating with the server.
> ' Nesting depth exceeds maximum expression depth 1.\nHINT: Increase the
> configuration parameter "max_expr_depth".\n\' in \'SELECT jobid, parent_uid,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 12:06 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> Hi Ken!
>
> Am 2007-02-25 21:26, Ken MacLeod schrieb:
> [ ... ]
> > Here's what I've done so far:
> >
> > * server/DBManager.py
> > - import sqlite3 as sqlite
> > - remove encoding="utf-8" from sqlite.connect
Why
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 13:53 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> Am 2007-02-26 13:39, Dan Williams schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 12:06 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Yeah, using a real database is the way to go.
>
> Maybe someone should also have a look at the
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 19:56 -0700, John Villalovos wrote:
> I have a question about Plague. Does Plague have the capability to
> handle dependencies where if you build one RPM that other RPMS depend
> on for their BuildRequires that you can then build all those RPMS and
> any other RPMS which mayb
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 08:58 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> On 03/28/2007 06:22 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 19:56 -0700, John Villalovos wrote:
> >> I have a question about Plague. Does Plague have the capability to
> >> handle dependencies where if y
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:18 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> On 03/28/2007 02:03 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 08:58 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> >> On 03/28/2007 06:22 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 19:56 -0700, John Villalovos w
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 22:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been working on fixing Plague 0.4.4.1 (and Plague in cvs) for Fedora
> 8 (and 7). The following test package works for me so far:
>
>
> http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/plague/plague-0.4.4.1-5.fc8.20071114.src.rpm
Do y
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 17:54 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> If in a failed job.log you see the message
>
> Job waited too long for repo to unlock. Killing it...
>
> please notify me.
>
> It's a problem in the plague server code that results in a denial of
> service for subsequent build jobs
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 03:56 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:55:56 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > > Certainly related, job #37767 just failed
> > >
> > > Failed to copy
> > > /srv/rpmbuild/server_work/fedora-5-epel/37767-php-pecl-memcache-2.2.1-1.el5/ppc/php-pecl-me
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:27 -0500, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
> The powers that be require us to use Perforce. Thus, the patch. A few
> things to note about it:
>
> * Our P4 server is running on a non-standard port and thus needs to be
> specified. scm_tuple is now created via rsplit instead. All
48 matches
Mail list logo
