On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 00:20 -0300, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
> Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> >>C++ is excellent for library development.
> >
> >
> > You have failed to consider what happens when multiple objects link to
> > different ABI-incompatible versions of libstdc++.
>
> I have not. Of course ther
Nicholas Miell wrote:
>>C++ is excellent for library development.
>
>
> You have failed to consider what happens when multiple objects link to
> different ABI-incompatible versions of libstdc++.
I have not. Of course there are problems with linking together objects
which themselves are linked a
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 21:50 -0300, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
> Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > Nice to see that somebody is finally trying to solve the problem,
> > instead of just letting the users suffer. Maybe C++ will actually be a
> > viable language for library development one day soon.
>
On 03/05/2006 12:15 AM, Leszek Matok wrote:
Dnia 05-03-2006, nie o godzinie 00:37 +0100, Erwin Rol napisał(a):
This is something that already bothers me a while, i think it never
really worked as expected, but i am not sure if it is a "my machine
only" kind of problem.
From http://www.gtk.org/a
Dnia 05-03-2006, nie o godzinie 01:34 +0100, Erwin Rol napisał(a):
> A better
> way would probably be having an extra entry always at the top (or bottom
> when the menu goes up, that holds the current selection, a bit like the
> font selection in OOo.org.
What you mean (I think) is making all GtkCo
Nicholas Miell wrote:
[SNIP]
> Nice to see that somebody is finally trying to solve the problem,
> instead of just letting the users suffer. Maybe C++ will actually be a
> viable language for library development one day soon.
C++ is excellent for library development.[1]
C++ libraries present di
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 01:15 +0100, Leszek Matok wrote:
> So probably it can be changed in the theme (or only the look and
> color, but not that behavior), but all themes I have here (Fedora 3)
> have it the way you experience and dislike. The purpose is to have the
> currently selected option righ
Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 03/04/2006 04:20 AM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 03:19 -0500, Build System wrote:
xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.0.1-3
-
* Thu Mar 02 2006 Mike A. Harris 1.0.1-3
- Made package arch specific due to pkgconfig f
Dnia 05-03-2006, nie o godzinie 00:37 +0100, Erwin Rol napisał(a):
> This is something that already bothers me a while, i think it never
> really worked as expected, but i am not sure if it is a "my machine
> only" kind of problem.
From http://www.gtk.org/api/2.6/gtk/GtkComboBox.html
"The style in
On 03/04/2006 06:37:54 PM, Erwin Rol wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> This is something that already bothers me a while, i think it never
> really worked as expected, but i am not sure if it is a "my machine
> only" kind of problem.
Happens here too - so it's not just you.
Regards, Willem Riede.
On 3/5/06, Erwin Rol wrote:
>
> Dropdown menu's that don't fit on the screen are not displayed
> correctly. For example take the gimp file-open dialog. When you move the
> dialog to the bottom border of the screen, and press the "All Files"
> dropdown menu, the menu will open, and the bottom of th
Hey all,
This is something that already bothers me a while, i think it never
really worked as expected, but i am not sure if it is a "my machine
only" kind of problem.
Dropdown menu's that don't fit on the screen are not displayed
correctly. For example take the gimp file-open dialog. When you mo
On 3/4/06, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> before suspending, log in as root on a tty, so that when you resume
> you can ctrl-alt-f1, and type 'vbetool post' (you'll have to type this
> 'blind')
> You may need to then flip back to X with alt-f7
>
> Does that do anything different ?
Uhh, no. Its not clear
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 14:37 -0800, Tom London wrote:
> No longer works for me: Thinkpad X41 (Intel 915 graphics).
I have T40 and I get exactly the same message in /var/log/messages, but
my screen does resume correctly. At the beginning, everything seems to
work fine, and then (in about 10 seconds)
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:59:15PM -0800, Tom London wrote:
> On 3/4/06, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:37:17PM -0800, Tom London wrote:
> > > No longer works for me: Thinkpad X41 (Intel 915 graphics).
> > >
> > > I tried booting with acpi_serialize, but no joy.
> > >
On 3/4/06, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:37:17PM -0800, Tom London wrote:
> > No longer works for me: Thinkpad X41 (Intel 915 graphics).
> >
> > I tried booting with acpi_serialize, but no joy.
> >
> > I do see this in /var/log/messages, believe it is when it is trying to
>
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:37:17PM -0800, Tom London wrote:
> No longer works for me: Thinkpad X41 (Intel 915 graphics).
>
> I tried booting with acpi_serialize, but no joy.
>
> I do see this in /var/log/messages, believe it is when it is trying to
> wakeup.
Is that with the latest kernel
No longer works for me: Thinkpad X41 (Intel 915 graphics).
I tried booting with acpi_serialize, but no joy.
I do see this in /var/log/messages, believe it is when it is trying to wakeup.
Mar 4 14:24:48 localhost kernel: Debug: sleeping function called from
invalid context at include/asm/semapho
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 21:09 +, Vitor Domingos wrote:
> Btw, what's the status for suspend/hibernate on FC5, specially on ATI Radeon
> cards ?
> I'm on rawhide (with tuesday updates) and it still doesnt resumes Xorg
> properlly.
My T42 laptop works great with its radeon mobility chip.
Two t
Btw, what's the status for suspend/hibernate on FC5, specially on ATI Radeon
cards ?
I'm on rawhide (with tuesday updates) and it still doesnt resumes Xorg
properlly.
//VD
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:20:26 -0500, sean wrote:
> As fc5 is fast approaching, here are my two minor annoyances:
>
> 1. ke
* Christopher Aillon [2006-03-04 10:20]:
>
> Changing from noarch -> arch-specific -> noarch typically breaks
> upgrading.
FWIW, I'm pretty sure these issues have all been dealt with during the move
from java bytecode to bytecode + native .sos. Tom Fitzsimmons would have
more details but if iss
Joachim Frieben wrote:
E.g. after removing you (GNOME) dot directories, the keyboard
settings will be regenerated correctly, and the dialog will be
gone.
2. With the new xkeyboard, a dialog comes up each time X is
started, asking if you want the X or gnome setting. There's
also a checkbox to n
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 15:14 -0500, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 14:49, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> >
> > > Yes
> > >
> > > There's no protection provided by bind-chroot that is not provided by
> > running
> > > named with SELinux in Enforcing mode.
> > >
> > I have my d
Great, i'm no longer having the kernel hang on boot withe the 2009.4.2
update (was reported here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-February/msg01375.html
-denis
On Saturday 04 March 2006 14:49, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
>
> > Yes
> >
> > There's no protection provided by bind-chroot that is not provided by
> running
> > named with SELinux in Enforcing mode.
> >
> I have my doubts about that.
>
> A chroot jail allows you to easily see what bind c
Yes
There's no protection provided by bind-chroot that is not provided by running
named with SELinux in Enforcing mode.
I have my doubts about that.
A chroot jail allows you to easily see what bind can and cannot do.
SElinux requires analysis of policy to accomplish the same thing.
It like
On Saturday 04 March 2006 14:14, Chris Tyler wrote:
>
> I noticed that the bind-chroot package is no longer installed by default
> (FC5t3 & rawhide), even through it's still present. Should we consider
> bind-chroot obsolete, since SElinux should be able to provide similar
> protection (prev
I noticed that the bind-chroot package is no longer installed by default
(FC5t3 & rawhide), even through it's still present. Should we consider
bind-chroot obsolete, since SElinux should be able to provide similar
protection (preventing named from touching files it should not, even if
compromised)
E.g. after removing you (GNOME) dot directories, the keyboard
settings will be regenerated correctly, and the dialog will be
gone.
>
> 2. With the new xkeyboard, a dialog comes up each time X is
> started, asking if you want the X or gnome setting. There's
> also a checkbox to not show the dialog
On Saturday, March 04, 2006 9:58 am, Frank Arnold wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 04.03.2006, 09:29 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > I see these messages too, on my PowerBook. I've been meaning to
> > file a bug about it but keep forgetting. Is it already being
> > tracked?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Am Samstag, den 04.03.2006, 09:29 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> I see these messages too, on my PowerBook. I've been meaning to file a
> bug about it but keep forgetting. Is it already being tracked?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156709
Regards,
Your bugzilla search inte
Any word on when the 64-bit bugs in Xair will be fixed? I have an old Voodoo
3 card (the only card I have that I could get DRI to work on with open
source drivers) that I'm dying to test with aiglx and my Athlon 64 box.
Thanks.
On Saturday, March 04, 2006 9:20 am, sean wrote:
> As fc5 is fast approaching, here are my two minor annoyances:
>
> 1. kernel messages about my dvd if there's a disk (
> unmounted) in it. /var/log/messages is filled with:
>
> hdc: media error (bad sector): status=0x51 { DriveReady
> SeekComplete E
As fc5 is fast approaching, here are my two minor annoyances:
1. kernel messages about my dvd if there's a disk (
unmounted) in it. /var/log/messages is filled with:
hdc: media error (bad sector): status=0x51 { DriveReady
SeekComplete Error }
hdc: media error (bad sector): error=0x30 {
LastF
Once upon a time, Rahul Sundaram said:
> On a related note all the RHEL documentation is being relicensed to OPL
> to match the new Fedora documentation licensing requirement and thereby
> pushing in tons of nice documentation available soon for Fedora not to
> mention less duplication of work.
On 03/04/2006 04:20 AM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 03:19 -0500, Build System wrote:
xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.0.1-3
-
* Thu Mar 02 2006 Mike A. Harris 1.0.1-3
- Made package arch specific due to pkgconfig files being placed in
lib64
Am Samstag, den 04.03.2006, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Émeric Maschino:
> Absolutely. Same situation here. Furthermore, the countdown when logging out a
> session or rebooting the system aren't working for me.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183563
Regards,
Frank
> When login on to gnome the home folder is always below trash. Should be
> in order from top down: computer, home folder, Trash.
Absolutely. Same situation here. Furthermore, the countdown when logging out a
session or rebooting the system aren't working for me.
dragoran wrote:
Vitor Domingos wrote:
Mike A. Harris wrote on 03/02/2006 07:02 PM:
Benjy Grogan wrote:
It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big
tent and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for
accelereated GL.
You don't seem to understand the problem
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 03:19 -0500, Build System wrote:
xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.0.1-3
-
* Thu Mar 02 2006 Mike A. Harris 1.0.1-3
- Made package arch specific due to pkgconfig files being placed in lib64
if the noarch packages manage to get built on x8
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 03:19 -0500, Build System wrote:
> xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.0.1-3
> -
> * Thu Mar 02 2006 Mike A. Harris 1.0.1-3
> - Made package arch specific due to pkgconfig files being placed in lib64
> if the noarch packages manage to get built on x86_64/ppc64/s390
Removed package umb-scheme
Updated Packages:
acpid-1.0.4-2
-
* Wed Mar 01 2006 Phil Knirsch - 1.0.4-2
- Added video.conf file to turn on DPMS when opening the laptop lid. Disabled
by default.
agg-2.3-4
-
* Fri Feb 17 2006 Karsten Hopp 2.3-4
- add BuildRequires freetype
Vitor Domingos wrote:
Mike A. Harris wrote on 03/02/2006 07:02 PM:
Benjy Grogan wrote:
It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big
tent and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for
accelereated GL.
You don't seem to understand the problem domain very well.
On 3/4/06, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On my system with system-config-keyboard-1.2.7-1.1
> If I run in Gnome the System --> Administration --> Keyboard tool, it
> gives absolutely nothing: only an empty window with title "Keyboard" and
> inside a keyboard-key icon with the text "select the appropria
On my system with system-config-keyboard-1.2.7-1.1
If I run in Gnome the System --> Administration --> Keyboard tool, it
gives absolutely nothing: only an empty window with title "Keyboard" and
inside a keyboard-key icon with the text "select the appropriate
keyboard for the system".
Wouldn't be us
45 matches
Mail list logo