Fedora Weekly News #164

2009-02-23 Thread Pascal Calarco
Fedora Weekly News Issue 164 Welcome to Fedora Weekly News Issue 164 for the week ending February 22nd, 2009. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue164 This week Announcements showcases Fedora Unity respins of Fedora 10, PlanetFedora selects some great blog entries on how to tag audio

Re: Starry background

2009-02-23 Thread Anuja KR
hi its looking good, it might look better, if the background is dark navvy blue, rather than black. though black is a conventional color of night sky, but to gel with fedora color scheme its better to use blue shades. anuja 2009/2/21 brian hurren brianhur...@yahoo.com I have just made up

Re: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27

2009-02-23 Thread brian hurren
/fedora-art-list/attachments/20090223/52060c71/attachment.html -- ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list End of Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27

cool *-wallpaper

2009-02-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
Hey, I saw this at design shack's latest blog post on designer's workstation: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bartelme/3292776820/ It's kind of a neat concept, it could be used for x monitors since it tiles. Anyhow just thought I'd point it out as a hey coolkind of thing.:) ~m

Re: cool *-wallpaper

2009-02-23 Thread Pavel Shevchuk
When i hooked up second (smaller) monitor i found that it's practically impossible to find good tiling wallpapers. I have 1 (one) =( On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hey, I saw this at design shack's latest blog post on designer's workstation:

Re: Background

2009-02-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
- Original Message From: Máirín Duffy mai...@linuxgrrl.com I *think* we're going to be okay. I'll know by Monday whether or not we might have an issue. I am going to cram this weekend and try to iterate on what we've got. Okay I am a bit worried at this point. I had no time

Re: cool *-wallpaper

2009-02-23 Thread Konstantinos Antonakoglou
Actually, it kind of reminds me an idea I had for Fedora, but instead of the sequence of colors of this wallpaper, we could use #00(cyan) , #000FFF, #FF (both are blue) and #0F (black). That means the 4 Fs and colors very familiar to Fedora. On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:09 -0800, Máirín

Re: F11 wallpaper mockup proposal

2009-02-23 Thread Paolo Leoni
I've a new proposal for you... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:F11-wallpaper-deepsky-mockup5.jpg The background photo was taken at Thermopylae, the place of historical battle with Leonidas and Spartans. Maybe It would be better a more stylized background...and what about for a spartan

Re: F11 wallpaper mockup proposal

2009-02-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
Hi Paolo, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:F11-wallpaper-deepsky-mockup5.jpg Could you provide us the source image information (url, license, etc) for the images you've got here? I do like the landscape but it seems maybe like it's not wide enough horizontally? ~m

Re: Help out with the f11 wallpaper?

2009-02-23 Thread Bob Peterson
- Máirín Duffy mai...@linuxgrrl.com wrote: | A) Greek columns, high-res, including either the top or bottom of the | pillar, straight-on / dead-on perspective, no angles. Will this work? I took this. http://www.robertpeterson.org/pict0072.JPG | B) A photo of a lake or body of water, with

Re: F11 wallpaper mockup proposal

2009-02-23 Thread Paolo Leoni
2009/2/23 Máirín Duffy mai...@linuxgrrl.com Could you provide us the source image information (url, license, etc) for the images you've got here? I do like the landscape but it seems maybe like it's not wide enough horizontally? I downloaded the helmet image here:

Re: F11 wallpaper mockup proposal

2009-02-23 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:59:47AM +0100, Paolo Leoni wrote: 2009/2/23 Máirín Duffy mai...@linuxgrrl.com Could you provide us the source image information (url, license, etc) for the images you've got here? I do like the landscape but it seems maybe like it's not wide enough

Tirthankar

2009-02-23 Thread tirthankar bachhar
Hello everyone, I'm tirthankar.i'm very new in fedora art.i just want to know what kind of work should i start first. If you kindly tell me i'll be very happy then. Thank you. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com

Re: cool *-wallpaper

2009-02-23 Thread Justin Fuhrer
Máirín Duffy wrote: Hey, I saw this at design shack's latest blog post on designer's workstation: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bartelme/3292776820/ It's kind of a neat concept, it could be used for x monitors since it tiles. Anyhow just thought I'd point it out as a hey coolkind of thing.:)

Re: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27

2009-02-23 Thread Nicu Buculei
brian hurren wrote: I made the background stars in the picture using Gimp, first I copied bg layes. then I opened noise/hurl, set percent to 1, and iterations to 1, and then hurled random pixels over the screen. Then I copied that layer and enlarged it by 200%, I repeated this step to give

Re: Tirthankar

2009-02-23 Thread Nicu Buculei
tirthankar bachhar wrote: Hello everyone, Hello and welcome! I'm tirthankar.i'm very new in fedora art.i just want to know what kind of work should i start first. If you kindly tell me i'll be very happy then. If you are looking for something to work on, we have some incoming requests

Re: Revisor (or Anaconda?) spin - unable to install on i586

2009-02-23 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Martin Langhoff wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com wrote: Can you maybe send me a log file with both Revisor as well as YUM set to debuglevel 9? Hi Jeroen, last week you mentioned the logs made sense... any news on this track? Did this evolve into

Is koji the right build tool for me? and some newbie questions

2009-02-23 Thread Zubin Sethna
Hi all Hope this is the correct mailing list to ask these questions. I've being looking at using koji for our in house project. After perusing the docs I have managed to set up a koji server with the web, xml-rpc, kojira and command line client components working. So now I want to do the

RE: Is koji the right build tool for me? and some newbie questions

2009-02-23 Thread Zubin Sethna
Thanks for the response Jitesh. When I look to see what koji requires for install I get: [zset...@einstein koji-packages]$ rpm -q --requires -p koji-1.2.0-3.fc7.noarch.rpm warning: koji-1.2.0-3.fc7.noarch.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 /bin/bash /usr/bin/python

rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10728/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel import.log,1.4,1.5

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11072/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS

rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11328/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel import.log,1.12,1.13

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11923/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/fontpackages/devel import.log,1.11,1.12

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12915/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13197/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13498/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13836/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14248/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS

rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14625/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14901/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15618/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15961/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16578/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16859/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17113/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

[Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table

2009-02-23 Thread kla
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 08:49:08 + 2009 --- *** Issue 99482 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17378/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17624/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18099/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18559/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18817/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19278/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19671/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/xgridfit/devel import.log,1.4,1.5 xgridfit.spec,1.10,1.11

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20719/devel Modified Files: import.log xgridfit.spec Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21004/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS

rpms/fontconfig/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 fontconfig.spec, 1.122, 1.123

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21733/devel Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild --- NEW FILE import.log ---

rpms/fontforge/devel fontforge.spec,1.40,1.41 import.log,1.1,1.2

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22446/devel Modified Files: fontforge.spec import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: fontforge.spec === RCS

rpms/stix-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20449/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file:

[Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 09:57:39 EDT --- From #11, I've done 1, 2, 5 and 6. I could

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 10:32:36 EDT --- 3. is mostly just filling the

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 10:40:47 EDT --- Well, for 7, do I need a compat- package? I

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 10:53:26 EDT --- You need a compat package if

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 11:12:02 EDT --- How does a compat subpackage doing the same

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 12:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19)

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 12:18:18 EDT --- repoquery gives me:

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state. Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 13:41:09 EDT --- The point of a compat package

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state. Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font

[Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 13:50:39 EDT --- Exactly! We both want that, I think, but what

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 14:05:50 EDT --- IIRC freefont has several

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 14:15:01 EDT --- So instead of main package, subpackages for

[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 14:25:11 EDT --- That way the only packages

[Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #7 from Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 15:51:00 EDT --- shrug.. I take it I just need to change

rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel efont-unicode-bdf.spec,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Author: mtasaka Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30615/efont-unicode-bdf/devel Modified Files: efont-unicode-bdf.spec Log Message: Mass rebuild, etc part 2 Index: efont-unicode-bdf.spec

[Bug 487061] New: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state. Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state. Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070 Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 487070] New: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861 Alias: CVE-2006-3467

rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel abyssinica-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21542 Modified Files: abyssinica-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: abyssinica-fonts.spec

[Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070 Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/alfont/devel alfont.spec,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/alfont/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28558 Modified Files: alfont.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: alfont.spec

rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4970 Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec

rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5114 Modified Files: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index:

rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12290 Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index:

rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12614 Modified Files: asana-math-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: asana-math-fonts.spec

rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6202 Modified Files: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec

rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.16,1.17

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6382 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec

rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel bitmap-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20257 Modified Files: bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: bitmap-fonts.spec

rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.14, 1.15

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20990 Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #42 from Ryo Dairiki ryo-dair...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-23 23:59:14 EDT --- Problem: - Chinese gryphs

rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel brettfont-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1834 Modified Files: brettfont-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: brettfont-fonts.spec

[Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 01:48:10 EDT --- The issue is

rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18998 Modified Files: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec

[Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 02:09:38 EDT --- Perhaps you can test with the

[Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24264 Modified Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index:

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7

2009-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27613 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec

Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)

2009-02-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le jeudi 19 février 2009 à 20:30 +0100, AKanda a écrit : Hello, Hi Akanda, The last update for VLgothicsvlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch is perhaps not good. (Install by yum.) Sorry for the delay, I was hoping other CJK users would answer, I don't use CJK myself. Chinese, Korean and

Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)

2009-02-23 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
Chinese, Korean and Japanese fonts are an old source of pain for font packagers, due to: ... CJK information processing being very hard to do correctly. See Ken Lunde's amazing 900-page tome, CJKV Information Processing, which recently appeared in its second edition:

Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)

2009-02-23 Thread Qianqian Fang
1. the way Unicode.org decided it would be a good idea to have them share codepoints (Han unification), Using unified code points to represent Han glyphs is nothing wrong, the only issue is the current fonts and fontconfig are not capable of distinguishing the z-variants, as Unicode

Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)

2009-02-23 Thread Jens Petersen
I think the particular problem here under F10 is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 - Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is quite the opposite: this happens most often when people are trying to read CJK text under non-CJK locales. Pango does not assume

Re: Outage Notification - Koji, plague 2009-02-21 15:00 UTC

2009-02-23 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:37:22PM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote: This has been completed and building is back to normal. please report any odd failures. there has been a very large change in koji. noarch subpackages are now supported, which needs srpms to be built in a chroot. the

security policy addition

2009-02-23 Thread Mike McGrath
Hey all, I've added an additional Self Access policy to our security policy: http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/security-policy/en-US/html-single/ Admins and users must not give themselves access to resources unless it is an emergency or a setup issue. Follow normal steps to get in a

  1   2   3   >