Hi gilpel;
I am no hardware expert; but maybe I can suggest some things to double
check and to remove and reinstall.
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 09:36 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> I'm trying :) But I never enabled rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing, and I
> installed the new update for kernel 2.6.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 19:50:33 +,
"Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> >The live spins already do everything installs, as they copy over the file
> >system rather than doing package based installation. Maybe that is a solution
> >the original poster could use.
>
> Really, a 700mb CD has everything
This issue has been resolved. The Makefile that resides in /var/yp/
does not export the shadow file by default.
-- A
Original Message
Subject:YPBIND Failure
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:19:31 -0600
From: Ashley M. Kirchner
To: Community assistance, encourag
> Hi;
>
> To whom it may concern:
>
>> > If you got that from RPMfusion, it's from the
>> > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing repo.
>>
> Yes it was.
>> I am not sure whether it came from the rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
>> repo or not. In frustration, at one point I might have downloaded it
>Steve Underwood wrote:
>> On 08/22/2009 12:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Steve Underwood wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
Fedora 11 has changed the input method system yet again. The new
system looks like its probably an improvement. However, I can't find
many of the input methods that us
> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:19:31 -0600
> From: ash...@pcraft.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: YPBIND Failure
>
>
> I'm trying to replace an old server (still running RH7.3) with a new
> one (running FC11). For the most part, everything works .
I'm trying to replace an old server (still running RH7.3) with a new
one (running FC11). For the most part, everything works ... except the
YP setup. The way things are configured is that this machine is the YP
master, and then I have a 3rd machine that's binding to it to get the
user in
On 08/23/2009 05:20 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:54:20 -0700
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Is there a Package Manager/Yum exclusion
list where I can prevent PM/Y from updating
certain packages?
Yep. In /etc/yum.conf in the [main] section
put a line like I have:
exclude=f
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:09:43 -0700
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> How can I resolve this problem?
The /var/log/Xorg.0.log may have info on why it picks the
modes it does. Maybe the driver isn't getting the EDID
info from the monitor. Maybe the default refresh rates
it uses instead exclude that mode?
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:28:13 +1000
Roger wrote:
> On the contrary, I enjoy going through all the options and selecting
> only the ones I need.
And I'd enjoy a lot more being able to select all the optional packages
up front then go through and unselect the ones I happen to know
I don't want (whi
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:54:20 -0700
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Is there a Package Manager/Yum exclusion
> list where I can prevent PM/Y from updating
> certain packages?
Yep. In /etc/yum.conf in the [main] section
put a line like I have:
exclude=freenx nx nxclient freenx-server
(I've got a very
On 8/23/2009 7:28 PM, Roger wrote:
> On 08/23/2009 06:50 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
>> On Sunday 23 August 2009 00:13:28 Markus Kesaromous wrote:
>>
>>> During fedora install, if the user selects a customized install rather
>>> than the default, the user has to manually click on each and every
>>>
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:14:10 -0500
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
When I filed a bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592612
the response from the epiphany developers was
"Thanks for taking the time to file this bug report. Can y
On 08/23/2009 06:50 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 23 August 2009 00:13:28 Markus Kesaromous wrote:
During fedora install, if the user selects a customized install rather
than the default, the user has to manually click on each and every app in
the selected group. This is horribly tedious
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:27 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> [...] While we can't do the former, as
> Seth explained because of necessary updates to so many other
> dependencies, [...]
My apologies. It was Rahul who explained this, but linked to Seth's blog
post about the $packagename-owner mail alias
On F8/9/10, I was able to drop in my xorg.conf
file into /etc/X11 directory and was able to get
the X display to recognize the Monitor type and
get 1600x1200 resolution, but for some reason,
I am not able to do this with F11.
My montor is a Hitachi CM715, and my onboard
video is an Intel 82945G/
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:14:10 -0500
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> Steve Blackwell wrote:
> >
> > When I filed a bug
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592612
> >
> > the response from the epiphany developers was
> >
> > "Thanks for taking the time to file this bug report. Can y
Is there a Package Manager/Yum exclusion
list where I can prevent PM/Y from updating
certain packages?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelin
2009/8/23 Cameron Simpson :
> On 21Aug2009 05:17, ann kok wrote:
> | ls -1 but I only want the file to list not directory
>
> Please don't top-post. PLease BELOW and TRIM the quoted material for
> context, as I have done.
>
> Have you tried:
>
> ls -l | grep '^-'
I don't understand why this thre
On 21Aug2009 05:17, ann kok wrote:
| ls -1 but I only want the file to list not directory
Please don't top-post. PLease BELOW and TRIM the quoted material for
context, as I have done.
Have you tried:
ls -l | grep '^-'
Cheers,
--
Cameron Simpson DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/runtime/spell/de.utf-8.spl
> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/runtime/spell/de.utf-8.sug
>
> Note: the "sug" file is not important but should improve spelling
> (don't know how)
>
> I've downloaded those files and saved into $HOME/.vim/spell
> Then I've tr
Hi Ann;
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 12:07 -0700, ann kok wrote:
> > >
> > > ]$ find . -maxdepth 1 -type f ! -name '.*'
> > > or,
> > > ]$ find . -maxdepth 1 -type f ! -regex '^.*/\..*'
> > > or,
> > > ]$ ls -hl | grep ^-
> > >
>
> This works fine
> but there is ./file as result
> How can remove ./ i
Hello everybody.
I bought some songs on a site, and they must be played before being
legalized, as I do this on Linux for legalized and allow me to tap WMA?
regards
Caio
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Gu
2009/8/23 Christoph Höger :
> Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2009, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Marco Guazzone:
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> [cut text]
>>
>> > I am missing something. If you get the file how do you get vim to
>> > correct the misspelled words?
>> >>
>>
>> Once you have
>The live spins already do everything installs, as they copy over the file
>system rather than doing package based installation. Maybe that is a solution
>the original poster could use.
Really, a 700mb CD has everything installed in it, so when it copies the fs
over,
everything is installed?
I w
> >
> > ]$ find . -maxdepth 1 -type f ! -name '.*'
> > or,
> > ]$ find . -maxdepth 1 -type f ! -regex '^.*/\..*'
> > or,
> > ]$ ls -hl | grep ^-
> >
This works fine
but there is ./file as result
How can remove ./ in the command also?
> > And I am sure there are a dozen seperate pe
Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2009, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Marco Guazzone:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> [cut text]
>
> > I am missing something. If you get the file how do you get vim to
> > correct the misspelled words?
> >>
>
> Once you have the dictionary file in $HOME/.vim/s
--- On Sun, 8/23/09, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
> Subject: Re: list files but not directory
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Received: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 12:26 PM
> Steven W. Orr wrote:
> >
> > Two things!
> >
>
On 08/23/2009 01:53 PM, brian wrote:
2.6.29.6-217.2.8.fc11.i586
Since yesterday, my computer has been shutting down randomly. Several
times, I had walked away from the box with nothing special running. I
thought it might be a hardware issue, checked connections, etc.
Just happened again. One
> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:25:03 -0400
> From: ryan.b.ly...@gmail.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: FC11 - flash plugin for Firefox
>
> If you search for 'leigh123' and 'flash-plugin' and '64 bit' and 'rpm'
> on fedoraforums.org, there is a
2.6.29.6-217.2.8.fc11.i586
Since yesterday, my computer has been shutting down randomly. Several
times, I had walked away from the box with nothing special running. I
thought it might be a hardware issue, checked connections, etc.
I wanted to know if there might be something in /var/log that
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 22:12 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>> Kpackagekit persistently pops up notices, overlaying whatever is
>> on-screen. Clicking the 'do not notify me' link does not do anything.
>> How can I kill this?
>
> In Gnome, the packagekit nag
On 08/23/2009 05:18 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
>
>
> Matthew Saltzman-2 wrote:
>>
>>
>> You should be good to go at that point, at least until the kernel
>> version number changes from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30.
>>
>>
>
> What is the significance of 2.6.30 in this regard? Are you implying that
> the akm
Steve Blackwell wrote:
>
> When I filed a bug
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592612
>
> the response from the epiphany developers was
>
> "Thanks for taking the time to file this bug report. Can you reproduce
> this problem with Epiphany 2.27.x with the WebKit backend?
>
> Becau
Steve Blackwell wrote:
> This plainly says >>> there will be no more bugfixes for version
> 2.26 and earlier. <<<
>
> Now you say there will be bugfixes. Who am I to believe?
That says the upstream developers will not provide bugfixes to that
release. It doesn't preclude the Fedora package mainta
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:27:53 -0700
Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 11:59 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> > That's what I was afraid of. The effect is that epiphany is not
> > maintained in F10. There won't be any bug fixes.
>
> That is certainly NOT the case. Fedora 10's Epiphany pac
Hello Michael,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:47:54 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:23:41 +0200, wwp wrote:
>
> > > Let RPM verify the installed packages (use "root" for that):
> > >
> > > rpm -V k3b k3b-libs k3b-extras-freeworld
> >
> > This commands outputs nothing and ret
Hi;
To whom it may concern:
> > If you got that from RPMfusion, it's from the
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing repo.
>
Yes it was.
> I am not sure whether it came from the rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> repo or not. In frustration, at one point I might have downloaded it
> from t
On 08/23/2009 09:29 PM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> That's what I was afraid of. The effect is that epiphany is not
> maintained in F10. There won't be any bug fixes.
Epiphany used to only do bug fixes in sync with GNOME and GNOME doesn't
do bug fixes for the version in Fedora 10 at this point anywa
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 11:59 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> That's what I was afraid of. The effect is that epiphany is not
> maintained in F10. There won't be any bug fixes.
That is certainly NOT the case. Fedora 10's Epiphany package, just as
all F-10 packages, will stop being maintained only wh
Steven W. Orr wrote:
>
> Two things!
>
> 1. Bash syntax:
> This will not work:
> function lsp() { ls $@ && less }
> If you do it in one line then it would have to be
> function lsp() { ls $@ && less; }
>
Yes - I did forget the ; at the end of the command. Bad morning...
> If you say ls && less
If you search for 'leigh123' and 'flash-plugin' and '64 bit' and 'rpm'
on fedoraforums.org, there is a very nice RPM and yum repo for Adobe's
64-bit flash-plugin. The packager keeps it reasonably well updated,
too.
-Ryan
On 2009-08-23, John Aldrich wrote:
> Coming into this discussion late, but
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 11:18 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> On 08/22/09 16:46, quoth Mikkel L. Ellertson:
> >> Just remember: "Do one simple thing and do i well." ;-)
> >>
> > And to carry this one step farther, you can create aliases or
> > function to do things you require often. For example, you
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:19:02 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/23/2009 08:45 PM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> > Anybody know how I can contact the epiphany Fedora package
> > maintainer?
...
> > In case whoever it is hangs out on this list, I want to know if
> > there are plans to release a 2.27.x
On 08/23/2009 08:45 PM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> Anybody know how I can contact the epiphany Fedora package maintainer?
>
> Googling led me to believe that it was but an
> e-mail to that address was rejected.
>
> Reason:5.2.1 ... Mailbox disabled for this
> recipient
>
> In case whoever it
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 00:41:27 +0930,
Tim wrote:
>
> Sure, some of the problems may be down to some packages which are merely
> problematic in combination. But there's always been some packages which
> were mutually exclusive. And there always will be, unless you eradicate
> such packages f
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:23:41 +0200, wwp wrote:
> > Let RPM verify the installed packages (use "root" for that):
> >
> > rpm -V k3b k3b-libs k3b-extras-freeworld
>
> This commands outputs nothing and returns 0.
Good. That means those packages passed the verification.
The long(er) verification
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:39:52 +0100
"Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)" wrote:
> On 23/08/09 16:37, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg00722.html
>
That's the one. Read all the follow-ups.
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:37:05 +0100
"Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)" wrote:
> On 23/08/09 16:15, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> > Anybody know how I can contact the epiphany Fedora package
> > maintainer?
> >
> > Googling led me to believe that it was but
> > an e-mail to that address was rejected.
> >
> > R
On 08/23/2009 09:09 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
> On 23/08/09 16:37, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg00722.html
Frank,
If you read the rest of the thread, Adam later clarified what he meant
https://www.redhat.com/archi
On 23/08/09 16:37, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg00722.html
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communic
On 23/08/09 16:15, Steve Blackwell wrote:
Anybody know how I can contact the epiphany Fedora package maintainer?
Googling led me to believe that it was but an
e-mail to that address was rejected.
Reason:5.2.1... Mailbox disabled for this
recipient
In case whoever it is hangs out on this l
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:59:18 +0200, Zoltan wrote:
> > I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac
> > or mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10.
> > Blank CD-R inserted and recognized, flac/mp3 files show correct
> > permissions for user.
> >
> >
I found this article:
http://dailypackage.fedorabook.com/index.php?/archives/172-Wednesday-Why-How-does-Pulseaudio-start.html
but it appears that it no longer applies.
$ ps -ef | grep pulse
steve30603 1 0 10:07 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/pulseaudio
--start --log-target=syslog
so either
On 08/22/09 16:46, quoth Mikkel L. Ellertson:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> There is just one thing that baffles me here --- isn't a directory also a
>> file?
>> Given that, what you ask for is not an option to list only files, it is an
>> option to list everything except directories. In other wor
Anybody know how I can contact the epiphany Fedora package maintainer?
Googling led me to believe that it was but an
e-mail to that address was rejected.
Reason:5.2.1 ... Mailbox disabled for this
recipient
In case whoever it is hangs out on this list, I want to know if there
are plans to r
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 22:12 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> Kpackagekit persistently pops up notices, overlaying whatever is
> on-screen. Clicking the 'do not notify me' link does not do anything.
> How can I kill this?
In Gnome, the packagekit nagger is a program started by Gnome session.
It's in
Anne Wilson:
>> It was explained long ago that installing "everything" would throw up some
>> serious conflicts/problems that would stop many thing working correctly.
Bruno Wolff III:
> Which was really an indication of problems that needed to get fixed, not
> specifically that there should never
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
> Unfortunately pavucontrol is not self-explanatory and apparently there is no
> help available, so I don't see how I should use it. Perhaps PulseAudio is
> somewhat premature in its present state of development?
>
You may want to visit http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/Documentat
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 23/08/09 00:59, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> There are both system wide and user preference settings. For user
>> preferences, I like to use pavucontrol (Applications --> Sound &
>> Video --> PulseAudio Volume Control). Pick the Playback tab. You
>> click on the down arro
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 09:50:39 +0100,
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 23 August 2009 00:13:28 Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> > During fedora install, if the user selects a customized install rather
> > than the default, the user has to manually click on each and every app in
> > the selected group
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>>
> Seems more complicated than using aspell ot ispell on the vim file.
> --
> ===
> The story you are about to hear is true. Only the names have been
> changed to protect the
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Friday 21 August 2009 18:20:06 William M. Quarles wrote:
I'm trying to set up a spanning desktop on my Dell Latitude C640 laptop,
which has an ATI Radeon Mobility 7500 graphics chipset and a Dell 1504FP
LCD monitor in analog (VGA) mode. I use Gnome on Fedora 10.
I can
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:30 +0200, Marco Guazzone wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> [cut text]
>
> > I am missing something. If you get the file how do you get vim to
> > correct the misspelled words?
> >>
>
> Once you have the dictionary file in $HOME/.vim/spell (i
Coming into this discussion late, but there *is* a Beta version of Flash
for x86_64 linux here: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
Scroll down to the bottom and you'll find the link to the download.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.r
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:37 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> James Bridge wrote:
> > I am trying to use avidemux in fedora 11 but when I try to play a video
> > I get the message "trouble initializing audio device". The video plays,
> > but silently. Prefs for sound give various options, including AL
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 02:18 -0700, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
>
> Matthew Saltzman-2 wrote:
> >
> >
> > You should be good to go at that point, at least until the kernel
> > version number changes from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30.
> >
> >
>
> What is the significance of 2.6.30 in this regard? Are you imply
On 08/22/2009 10:12 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Kpackagekit persistently pops up notices, overlaying whatever is
on-screen. Clicking the 'do not notify me' link does not do anything.
How can I kill this?
It's another of the little things I classify as "we're smarter than
you are, so we are going t
Hello Michael,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:38:58 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:25:39 +0100, Anne wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 23 August 2009 10:36:50 wwp wrote:
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac or
> > > mp3
Hello Zoltan,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:59:18 +0200 Zoltan Szabo wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:36:50 +0200
> wwp wrote:
>
> > Hello there,
> >
> >
> > I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac
> > or mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10.
On Sunday 23 August 2009 12:25:39 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 23 August 2009 10:36:50 wwp wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> >
> > I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac or
> > mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10. Blank
> > CD-R inserted and
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Arun Shrimali wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Didar Hossain wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Arun Shrimali wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Didar Hossain
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Arun Shrimali wrote:
> Dear
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:25:39 +0100, Anne wrote:
> On Sunday 23 August 2009 10:36:50 wwp wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> >
> > I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac or
> > mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10. Blank
> > CD-R inserted and reco
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:19:30 +0930
Tim wrote:
> I suspect that really *needs* to be an *or*. If one's used kmod-nvidia,
> then tried akmod-nvidia, without removing the former, that may be a
> cause for problems.
I don't think so - all akmod-nvidia does is build and install the
same kmod-nvidia r
On Sunday 23 August 2009 10:36:50 wwp wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
> I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac or
> mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10. Blank
> CD-R inserted and recognized, flac/mp3 files show correct permissions
> for user.
>
>
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:36:50 +0200
wwp wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
> I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac
> or mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10.
> Blank CD-R inserted and recognized, flac/mp3 files show correct
> permissions for user
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 05:07 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> make sure you have the kmod-nvidia or akmod-nvidia RPM for the
> correct architecture
I suspect that really *needs* to be an *or*. If one's used kmod-nvidia,
then tried akmod-nvidia, without removing the former, that may be a
cause for
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 11:36 +0200, wwp wrote:
> I have no clue about what was changed that could prevent this
> operation, maybe a yum update..
>
> Any hint?
>
Hint: Look in the /var/log/yum.log file.
Need more help? Post the tail end of the file, include what's been
recently installed since
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:50 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> It was explained long ago that installing "everything" would throw up
> some serious conflicts/problems that would stop many thing working
> correctly.
And even an "install almost everything" option is likely to be just as
problematic. It's
On 23/08/09 00:59, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>> I have two pieces of audio hardware. How do I tell pulseaudio on Fedora 11
>> which one to use? Does a config file exist for that purpose and how is its
>> syntax?
>>
> There are both system wide and user preference settings. F
On 22/08/09 23:24, stan wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:27:30 +0200
> "Erik P. Olsen" wrote:
>
>> I have two pieces of audio hardware. How do I tell pulseaudio on
>> Fedora 11 which one to use? Does a config file exist for that purpose
>> and how is its syntax?
>>
>
> I think it is in (Gnome men
Hello there,
I'm getting an error when attempting to create an audio CD from flac or
mp3 files. K3b 1.0.5 (using KDE 3.5.10-13-fc10) within Fedora 10. Blank
CD-R inserted and recognized, flac/mp3 files show correct permissions
for user.
The point is that the necessary plug-ins are loaded as seen
Matthew Saltzman-2 wrote:
>
>
> You should be good to go at that point, at least until the kernel
> version number changes from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30.
>
>
What is the significance of 2.6.30 in this regard? Are you implying that
the akmod-nvidia and/or kmod-nvidia won't work with 2.6.30?
--
Vie
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 10:57 +1000, Roger wrote:
>
> I think this probably means that you don't have the kernel-devel RPM
> for
> that kernel.
>
>
> I run Fedora 11 and have problems with video every kernel update so
> have reverted to a kernel from 2 months ago.
>
> Does the above mean that I
On Sunday 23 August 2009 00:13:28 Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> During fedora install, if the user selects a customized install rather
> than the default, the user has to manually click on each and every app in
> the selected group. This is horribly tedious. In the old RH releases, you
> could just c
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
[cut text]
> I am missing something. If you get the file how do you get vim to
> correct the misspelled words?
>>
Once you have the dictionary file in $HOME/.vim/spell (in this case
the file is "de.utf-8.spl") you can spell check inside ViM by
86 matches
Mail list logo
