On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis are working on the mail man migration.
The major features include:
1)
On 01/06/2010 05:48 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:09:56 -0600 (CST), Mike McGrath
mmcgr...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I'm interested in working on it with you -from the composing side as
well. I'm assuming I'm gonna need to read up a lot, is there a Fedora
reference page somewhere
On 01/07/2010 12:34 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And it was fairly easy ;-) For those interested:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055
$ curl -I http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gpxe.spec
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:33:18 GMT
On 12/22/2009 06:36 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
- Use the alternatives system to point to one stack or the other for the
system default stack (think standalone applications).
Not that I'm anywhere near an expert in ruby matters, but I have
Hi there,
Not that anything is set in stone yet, but I wanted to give you a
heads-up on packaging changes in Ruby that we (the Ruby SIG) are trying
to figure out.
The ultimate goal is to make Fedora the best development platform out
there no matter what it is exactly you target.
Core features
, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen
kana...@kanarip.comwrote:
On 12/14/2009 10:46 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 12/14/2009 09:36 PM, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
Would someone be interested to make a talk on Fedora Community
infrastructure at FOSDEM'10 - Belgium
On 12/14/2009 10:27 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I woke up today and we're still having dns issues on at least one of my
hosts.
Could everyone that has access please do a dig fedoraproject.org on all
their hosts and tell me if any of them cannot resolve?
I'm fine from 7 different locations in
On 12/14/2009 09:36 PM, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
Would someone be interested to make a talk on Fedora Community
infrastructure at FOSDEM'10 - Belgium -?
* FedoraCommunity, opensourced LaunchPad, Bugzilla extensions, etc...
BTW, as the rule have changed at FOSDEM, you will do your
On 12/14/2009 10:46 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 12/14/2009 09:36 PM, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
Would someone be interested to make a talk on Fedora Community
infrastructure at FOSDEM'10 - Belgium -?
* FedoraCommunity, opensourced LaunchPad, Bugzilla extensions, etc...
BTW
On 11/25/2009 08:38 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Instead of this I would pretty much like to have the normal install DVD
being full (4GB, instead of 3.0-3.3GB as now), so when installing a
computer I have more content on local media and less stuff to get from
online sources, resulting in a shorter
On 11/25/2009 03:26 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Matthew Miller wrote:
So would this mean one disk with two repositories on it, or is
everything
mashed together all in one repository?
it'd be easy to have two sets of repodata in two different dirs pointing
to the same set of
On 11/25/2009 03:39 PM, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 13:18 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Also, the way I understand this works, you can just include x86_64
packages in the one repository...
You can but that will break x86_64, because i386 will need i386
packages that x86_64
On 11/24/2009 05:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
(I really don't want to maintain the mingw32-sha256sum package for
Fedora, as it's just a quick and dirty hack to built a small subset of
of coreutils for Windows.)
Thoughts?
Well, if you
On 11/23/2009 06:12 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
In an effort to work on the cvs side of
https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/165 I'd like to have an
offsite copy of cvs1:/cvs/pkgs to test on. Being that this is in
violation of our security policy
On 11/23/2009 05:18 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 06:12 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
In an effort to work on the cvs side of
https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/165 I'd like to have an
offsite copy of cvs1:/cvs/pkgs to test on. Being that this is in
violation of our security
On 11/23/2009 06:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 05:18 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Just curious, what part of the policy does a local copy from a public
rsync location conflict with?
Having pressed Ctrl+Enter before I was done
On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
mod_wsgi) and one that we wrote ourselves[1] is our mirrorlist server.
It's the backend that powers:
On 10/26/2009 12:37 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
mod_wsgi
On 10/15/2009 08:03 PM, Peter Scheie wrote:
From a running Centos liveCD (minimal) I want to launch anaconda with a
kickstart file. Right now we build a small ISO using isolinux that
loads the kernel and points it to the kickstart file on an HTTP server
(ks=http://blah.blah.blah/ks.cfg). But
harry.dev...@faa.gov wrote:
We have our development servers here where I work that are running
CentOS 5.2 64-bit on them. One of our projects has a LiveCD that we
build and provide. It is currently built on a Fedora 8 PC that I have
but we'd like to move to Fedora 11 or 12.
What I'd like
Alan Pevec wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Francesco Crippa fcri...@byte-code.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've got a problem with the script livecd-iso-to-pxe... It creates the right
files (under /tftboot directory) but I can't pxeboot a machine with this configuration.
During the pxeboot,
On 09/26/2009 11:47 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote:
Am Samstag, den 26.09.2009, 23:26 +0200 schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen:
Pungi does not support selecting exact package nevra in the %packages
manifest of a kickstart, but Revisor does; use --kickstart-nevra
I guess you mean --kickstart-exact-nevra
On 09/23/2009 10:24 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I am building an auto install iso for some repeated, specialized
deployments and I have run into a problem. I am building them with
pungi and using the latest packages from fedora 11, but a bug in the
2.6.30 kernel seems to be preventing me from
On 09/14/2009 03:45 AM, À wrote:
Hi, xiao li
This is very normally error.
FWIW, I have this error on Fedora 11 regularly, too.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
On 07/28/2009 03:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
For those that had not noticed, rubygem-rails-2.3.3 requires
rubygem-rack whatever-is-available-now, so...
-- Jeroen
On 07/28/2009 03:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
On 07/28/2009 12:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review
and
I've built at least a few anaconda
On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part
of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the
fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a
significant amount more bits[1], ...
Hey,
appreciate if the verdict goes in the ticket;
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/180
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 07/07/2009 06:39 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:24 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
If you take into account that the proposal concerns security fixes only,
then every update has to be labeled a security update (and preferably
have some kind of CVE/bug# attached??). We
on the proposal. So I'll be happy to wait
and see what comes of this.
+1 to all of the above.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
security fixes at all.
I think it is worse. It causes people to have an expectation that
something will get security updates, and when it doesn't happen and
they get compromised, they will not be very happy.
The same goes for current releases, don't you think?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
On 07/07/2009 12:29 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 07/06/2009 03:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Bugzilla spam. If we keep the release open for random bug filing, we
have no good way of telling bugzilla that only specific users should get
bugs for specific releases of Fedora. Ownership is at a
On 07/07/2009 12:07 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 23:58 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
You can find more details at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features
whether people can opt-in later,
at any given point, or whether they opt-in because I share their
personal information.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 07/02/2009 05:31 PM, Xavier Toth wrote:
It's a one liner.
--- anaconda-11.5.0.12/yuminstall.py.orig 2009-06-30
09:05:19.0 -0500
+++ anaconda-11.5.0.12/yuminstall.py2009-06-30 09:06:03.0 -0500
@@ -575,8 +575,7 @@
YumSorter.getReposFromConfig(self)
#
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:13:07 +0100, Christopher Brown
snecklif...@gmail.com
wrote:
Honestly, I'm impressed by your persistence but I think simply trying
to re-instate Fedora Legacy (which it sounds like this is what you are
trying to do) is doomed to permanent failure.
I love your
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:03:01 +0200, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Whether 6 months of additional availability of security updates is going
to help, and to what extend, we'll have to see. Compared to the current
situation, that'll give an environment 7
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:27:43 +0100, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 17:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
As described on the Feature page, but if there's any specific
questions
about the reasoning on there I'll be happy to answer those questions.
I
in the paragraph on the Feature page,
or ...?
Thanks,
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:25:08 +0100, Christopher Brown
snecklif...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/7/6 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:13:07 +0100, Christopher Brown
snecklif...@gmail.com
wrote:
Honestly, I'm impressed by your persistence but I think simply trying
to re
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:56:43 -0400, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
wrote:
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
- The issue I have with this plan (and the others very like it) is that
if you say we will just do updates for the things we have people
willing to do updates it means the
On 07/06/2009 09:19 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen (kana...@kanarip.com) said:
These two are my big concerns - doing this badly is worse than not
doing it, IMO. When it comes to user's security, I don't want to give
promises we can't keep, or leave them in a bind.
This has been
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:20:38 + (UTC), Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen, Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:30:46 +0200:
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0200, Julian Aloofi
To be honest, I think environments that work like that won't use Fedora
anyway if it wasn't supported
On 07/05/2009 12:12 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:03:05PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it
turns out to be. This disqualifies
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:44 +0100, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of
approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:22:41 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de
wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote
I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
Is it that time of the year
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0200, Julian Aloofi
julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle reads:
Say a desktop environment runs Fedora 9 today, then within a month
after Fedora 11 is released, the user can choose to either upgrade to
On 06/23/2009 06:14 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:22:07 -0400,
Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen (kana...@kanarip.com) said:
So yeah, the problem we get with i386/x86_64 hybrids is more that we
would reduce the available size to either
On 06/17/2009 11:49 PM, Robert L Cochran wrote:
I just installed puppet, meaning
puppet.noarch 0.24.8-1.fc11
puppet-server.noarch 0.24.8-1.fc11
On Fedora 11 x86_64.
I then began following instructions at this website:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/SimplestPuppetInstallRecipe
and
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:11:11 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 01:01 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The question is not *if* Fedora Unity would take on that burden, the
question is whether upstream will let us.
Upstream accepts reasonable patches
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:15:54 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 00:30 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Your signature promotes freedom^2 but this pisses you off?
The reasoning behind it is what irks me. It really seems to come down
to I'm just going to do
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:48:07 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 01:37 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Dear Jesse,
you yourself do not accept patches beyond what you then, at that moment,
think are applicable use-cases of Fedora Project Release
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:56:58 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
Something else not terribly unreasonable, instead of split CD media, a
single CD offered that is netinst.iso plus the contents of @core and
@base if it'll fit on a CD. Then they can do whatever custom install
they
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:34:37 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 17:54 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
If Fedora Unity's motivation to continue a service to the community -at
it's own expense, not yours- is holding you and the other teams hostage,
call
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:20:09 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen
kana...@kanarip.com
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:37:41 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 03:30 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
A script that takes the DVD image to produce the CD versions would
basically
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:37:14 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka
mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/15/2009 03:52 AM +9:00:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472622
Reported in Nov 2008.
Is it really that difficult to fix it?
No, but I have
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:00:02 -0400 (EDT), Seth Vidal
skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Valent Turkovic wrote:
I have a few ideas and suggestions on how to improve Fedora Planet
site, please tell me what do you think about them.
1. Search
- currently there isn't any
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:34:19 +, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 14:53 +, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
I appreciate the clarification from you and Matt on the request. As
you know Jesse my, and Unity's, goal has been for a while has been to
get Fedora in
those that request or even require split CD media? If
that is too much to ask from a anaconda/qa/releng perspective, would the
Fedora Project maybe consider finally allowing those from Fedora Unity that
do it anyway, to do it *via* the Fedora Project?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
[1
installer images. You would point it at a
mounted DVD, configure a repository pointing to the DVD, and voila, you can
do anything you like with it.
This is what I use to create the Everything spins too; I just change the
package payload, but do not change the installer images.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van
On 05/26/2009 05:44 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 15:50:49 Seth Vidal wrote:
I was changing some settings with my mobile phone company and in order to
change my password they made me use what looks a lot like 2 factor auth:
something I know: my current password
something I have:
van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
places... dont know.
livecd-tools (and the pretty Revisor UI) have a feature to base a compose
off of another LiveCD since... like... the beginning of either of these
projects... or at least since midst 2007.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora
On 05/15/2009 07:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/15/2009 10:36 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I would like to object to the image of Fedora merely being an
alternative, especially in the context of being an alternative to
Microsoft Windows. If anything, Microsoft Windows is a very sad
On 05/15/2009 08:03 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I also think the Fedora Project
is stronger in it's development edge/focus, thriving Free Software
innovation by early adoption and being a platform (often? most?) used by
upstream developers, yada yada, blabla, insert other things here
On 05/15/2009 02:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I helped write what is described in the front page of what Fedora is
for. To quote from http://fedoraproject.org
Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that showcases the latest in
free and open source software. ...
While I think what
or the DVD perform the installation of Fedora.
Hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
that have been removed from the mirror because for example they've
expired and have been superseeded by another update to said package).
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
jigdofy_everything.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
___
Fedora
creating your own customised version. Revisor is a tool that
lets you do just this, and in this tutorial, we'll show you how...
Read more:
http://www.pcplus.co.uk/node/3020
Please digg:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Tutorial_Build_Your_Own_Linux_Distro_With_Fedora
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
On 04/23/2009 10:48 PM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
Let it ROAR
That's actually nice !
Is « roar » an action verb in english ?
If so, it could be nice to use it as the main verb of the sentance,
something like « Roar with pleasure » (but with something other than «
pleasure »,
Hello,
I'm sending you this announcement because it's a very interesting event
organized by the Dutch UUG, on the subject of Filesystems Storage,
with key people giving keynotes and sessions amongst which is the core
developer of ext4.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
==
Every
in the chroot will
run. I suspect rpm is preventing installation of x86_64 packages on a
i386 host.
I think it's YUM that does not include the x86_64 in the pkgSack (using
yum.rpmUtils.arch.getArchList() over rpmUtils.arch.getBaseArch()).
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys
van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
they finally shipped the
icon in system-logos. :(
I think generic-logos is open for provenpackagers like yourself. You can
log the bug and fix it.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com wrote:
If I gave you some 2.1.4 revisor packages to test on Fedora 9 (I'm not sure
they work but there have been no major changes), are you able to test them?
Yes. My only 'compat' concern
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you planning on updating the F-9 or F-11 packages with it?
Hi Jeroen,
- is there a revision coming on the F-9 or F10 branches?
I'm planning a release for F-10.
- can you check
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
Two things:
1) Should we get reporters to stop calling it Red Hat Fedora?
Yes.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com wrote:
Can you maybe send me a log file with both Revisor as well as YUM set to
debuglevel 9?
Hi Jeroen,
last week you mentioned the logs made sense... any news on this track?
Did this evolve
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com wrote:
Since your first mail, I've tried to reproduce this. I have no problems
producing installation media with both openssl.i386 and openssl.i686 in the
RPM payload (Packages/ directory
. This however is
using a fresh git clone off of master, not the released version of
Revisor on Fedora 9.
Are you composing Live media by any chance? I can see how there is no
.i386 version of openssl installed.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora
seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Well, a URL that was:
/git/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=252c7c1bf9779dbdba94abe47350c866ba8ca421
is now (in the test instance):
/cgit/initscripts.git/commit/?id=252c7c1bf9779dbdba94abe47350c866ba8ca421
We may
for appointments I found it to be useless.
Nonetheless, it could be worthwhile for allocating Test days and
Events -and things of the sort.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list
Clint Savage wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, guys. Uh, quick intro for those who see the redhat.com and wonder
who I am - I'm Adam Williamson. I'm new in the Fedora QA department here
at RH, my job is to drive
from my side.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Hey,
I'd like the following patch to be applied. It fixes the redirects for
RPM-GPG-KEY files for secondary arches not to be redirected to
/pub/fedora-secondary/, so that Jigdo's can find the files.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
commit b240e804a23e4171d21de19f0de0ec4b34586654
Frank Murphy wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
You may be interested in participating in our Test Team even if only you
report your upgrade from Fedora 8 went good or bad.
http://lists.fedoraunity.org/pipermail/test-team/2009-January/000304.html
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Hi
Teb (Zikula NL) wrote:
Hi all,
I have just subscribed to both the fedora-infrastructure-list and the
fedora-docs-list to keep you (and myself) updated about the
documentation project.
Hello Arjen,
good to hear we have another Dutchman on board ;-) Welkom!
Kind regards,
Jeroen van
,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Fedora Unity and Cooperation KDE- Gnome might raise some eyebrows but
would not be easy to auto-sanity-check.
/me raises one or two eyebrows...
I see we're being used as an example but I'm not sure I understand what
you're saying ;-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van
to exist.
If you are going to change anything, maybe consider using [files] vs.
/path/to/files/ since that name for the mount appears to be most
commonly used.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora
Hey there,
I was interviewed by HowSoftwareIsBuilt.com a few weeks ago; the
interview's transcript is online now;
http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/12/21/interview-with-jeroen-van-meeuwen-fedora-project-vice-president-fedora-emea/
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora
Bryan Kearney wrote:
My goal is to not re-write the logic in these other tools
(appliance-creator, punci, virt-convert, ec2-converter, etc) but rather
to make a controlled use of them since the output of one becomes the
input to another. To achieve this, the code basically replaces the
around to applying this diff;
I've pushed the update to EPEL-5 testing.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
Connie Sieh wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Martin Langhoff wrote:
Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot
build a F9 + updates installer CD.
The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the
stock F9 config files that ship
and it
wasn't there. It was a directory higher.
this fixed the problem:
sudo ln -s /usr/share/revisor/comps-cleanup.xsl
/usr/share/revisor/comps/comps-cleanup.xsl
Fixed in GIT, thanks.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
this problem.
Nevertheless I dug through the code and found a little discrepancy, now
having resolved the issue (in GIT).
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
to release one of it's
infamous Re-Spins which include a new rebuilt stage2.img as well.
However, this Re-Spin will first need to pass our testing before we
release it.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
