Greg Woods wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 13:42 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On my system, I turn off NetworkManager and build (by hand) a ifcfg-br0
script to define the bridge, and make ifcfg-eth0 part of the bridge, moving
all IPADDR and such parameters to the bridge.
This was going to be my
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:55 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 16:11:11 Greg Woods wrote:
I'm guessing I could set up a VM that has a real IP address rather than
using NAT
In VirtualBox you set this up as follows:
* open VirtualBox
* open the settings window for
Greg Woods wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:55 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 16:11:11 Greg Woods wrote:
I'm guessing I could set up a VM that has a real IP address rather than
using NAT
In VirtualBox you set this up as follows:
* open VirtualBox
* open the settings
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 12:42 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 16:11:11 Greg Woods wrote:
I'm guessing I could set up a VM that has a real IP address rather than
using NAT
Now I need to figure out how to do this for KVM.
This script may contain useful information
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:16:24 -0700
Greg Woods wrote:
What confuses me is that on my Centos 5/Xen boxes, eth0 has the
regular IP address, there is another pseudo-device called peth0 which
is what is seen in virt-manager, and the bridge configuration appears to
be much more complicated.
All
From: Tom Horsley
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:42 AM
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Using USB devices in VMs under KVM fc11 or fc12
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:16:24 -0700
Greg Woods wrote:
What confuses me is that on my Centos 5/Xen boxes, eth0 has
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 13:42 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On my system, I turn off NetworkManager and build (by hand) a ifcfg-br0
script to define the bridge, and make ifcfg-eth0 part of the bridge, moving
all IPADDR and such parameters to the bridge.
This was going to be my next step. I actually
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:54:26 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Has anyone tried this, and if so can you comment on the viability of this as a
way to control USB devices?
My one attempt to use a non-trivial usb device resulted in this:
On 12/06/2009 08:42 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:54:26 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Has anyone tried this, and if so can you comment on the viability of
this as a way to control USB devices?
My one attempt to use a non-trivial usb device resulted in
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:44 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I was/am hoping to be able to use windows vm to program a universal
remote via usb too ... by the way have you tried virtualbox ? I wonder
if it has better usb support than qemu?
Still not very good though. I have never been able to sync
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:44 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
On 12/06/2009 08:42 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:54:26 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Has anyone tried this, and if so can you comment on the viability of
this as a way to control USB devices?
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 16:11 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
VirtualBox works for me (to the extent of synching my old Palm Tx) but
you have to use the non-free version as the free one doesn't have USB
support.
How much does it cost to get a home user license for the non-free
version?
On 12/06/2009 11:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:44 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I plan to try Xen at some point but I doubt if it will be any better.
I suspect Xen is dying/dead and not well supported now ... at least
kms is in upstream kernel, and VB has sun (or whoever!)
On 12/06/2009 11:57 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
I suspect Xen is dying/dead and not well supported now ... at least
kms is in upstream kernel, and VB has sun (or whoever!) keeping the
kernel modules updated.
s/kms/kvm/
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 16:28:10 Greg Woods wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 16:11 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
VirtualBox works for me (to the extent of synching my old Palm Tx) but
you have to use the non-free version as the free one doesn't have USB
support.
How much does it cost
On 12/06/2009 09:44 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
On 12/06/2009 08:42 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:54:26 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Has anyone tried this, and if so can you comment on the viability of
this as a way to control USB devices?
My one attempt to
On Sunday 06 December 2009 16:11:11 Greg Woods wrote:
I'm guessing I could set up a VM that has a real IP address rather than
using NAT, but the GUIs don't generally support this and I haven't yet
learned how to create a VM or a virtual network from the command line.
If I did that I could
On 12/06/2009 12:48 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I'm using VirtualBox (not the OSE version) to run an XP VM that I use
with for iTunes/iPhone and a Logitech Harmony remote control. It seems
to handle USB well.
Funnily enough there is a linux package for that controller too ...
(concordance /
On 12/06/2009 10:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
The problem is that the device appears to be recognized just fine, but I
can never establish a sync connection.
You can try Sun's VirtualBox. For something like the Palm, that only
appears when you hit the sync button/icon, so you need to create a
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 09:28 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 16:11 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
VirtualBox works for me (to the extent of synching my old Palm Tx) but
you have to use the non-free version as the free one doesn't have USB
support.
How much does it cost
Mail Lists wrote:
On 12/06/2009 11:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:44 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I plan to try Xen at some point but I doubt if it will be any better.
I suspect Xen is dying/dead and not well supported now ... at least
kms is in upstream kernel, and VB
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 16:11:11 Greg Woods wrote:
I'm guessing I could set up a VM that has a real IP address rather than
using NAT, but the GUIs don't generally support this and I haven't yet
learned how to create a VM or a virtual network from the command line.
If I
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 11:57 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
On 12/06/2009 11:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
I plan to try Xen at some point but I doubt if it will be any better.
I suspect Xen is dying/dead and not well supported now ...
That depends on what distro you are running. Xen is well
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:39 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
The VirtualBox-OSE (the open-source edition) is in rpmfusion and doesn't have
USB support. The VirtualBox (the Sun closed-source edition) is in Sun's yum
repository and does support USB.
OK, then I am using the non-free version
Has anyone tried this, and if so can you comment on the viability of this as a
way to control USB devices? Some devices are simply not usefully supported at
the application level in Linux, although the drivers are fine. Therefore the
need to run an app, preferably in a VM rather than under wine
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:54:26 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Has anyone tried this, and if so can you comment on the viability of this as
a
way to control USB devices?
My one attempt to use a non-trivial usb device resulted in this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524723
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
