Patrick -
When I installed hplip for my OfficeJet J6480, the automatic configuration
didn't work correctly. Further, I couldn't fix it with either
system-config-printer, cups, or lpadmin. I had to manually delete the
printer from the printers.conf file, the restart the cups service.
Then, I am confuse.
Right now, rpm -q hplip and hpijs shwow that I did not install
hplip and hpijs
But I installed hplip from hplip-3.9.8.run, ie, that hplip and hpijs
are installed ?
So. I could remove the hplip-3.9.8, and install hpijs.rpm (fedora 11)
and it should work. But then if I
Patrick Dupre kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 20.
elokuuta 2009):
> I can try to remove hplip.
> But, when I print, do I really use hplip ?
Yes, you use the hp CUPS backend included in the hplip package
and the driver from the hpijs pacakge.
> Do I only need a ppd fil
Hello,
I can try to remove hplip.
But, when I print, do I really use hplip ?
Do I only need a ppd file ?
Where do I get the hp-laserjet_p1005.ppd.gz file ?
Am I wrong ?
Thank.
I shouldn't really butt in,
but what is the advantage of using hplip,
as opposed to just giving the printer in
I shouldn't really butt in,
but what is the advantage of using hplip,
as opposed to just giving the printer in CUPS?
Well, maybe I am being unfair.
I run hplip with my ancient LaserJet 5L,
because hplip suggested it could clean the print-head,
and tell me how low the cartridge was;
but in f
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:00 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I did try the .tgz file as well as the .run file
> In my opinion their identical
> 3.8.9
Neither of those is the Fedora package. :-(
Sorry, can't help. Maybe ask the HPLIP maintainers.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Descript
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 21:03 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
OK, but is was working with the version 3.9.6b !
Patrick, are you using Fedora packages now, or downloading and compiling
HPLIP yourself?
I did try the .tgz file as well as the .run file
In my
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 21:03 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> OK, but is was working with the version 3.9.6b !
Patrick, are you using Fedora packages now, or downloading and compiling
HPLIP yourself?
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-l
OK, but is was working with the version 3.9.6b !
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 19:25:47 Patrick Dupre wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
When I make lpr of the attached file I only get blank pages !
I am using fedora 11 and hplip 3.9.8
lpr doesn&#
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 19:25:47 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> When I make lpr of the attached file I only get blank pages !
> >> I am using fedora 11 and hplip 3.9
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
When I make lpr of the attached file I only get blank pages !
I am using fedora 11 and hplip 3.9.8
lpr doesn't grock postscript. You need to feed the file through something
like ghostscript first:
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
When I make lpr of the attached file I only get blank pages !
I am using fedora 11 and hplip 3.9.8
lpr doesn't grock postscript. You need to feed the file through
something like ghostscript first:
gs -sOutputFile=%pipe%lpr name-of-fi
Hello,
When I make lpr of the attached file I only get blank pages !
I am using fedora 11 and hplip 3.9.8
Any idea ?
Thank.
--
---
==
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 08:36 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> So... When will we see 3.9.8 hit the repositories?
As soon as your local mirror updates. I submitted this as a test update
on Friday.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-list
On Saturday 08 August 2009 16:37:17 Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 16:04 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:36:56 Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > > I noticed that the current available version on the F11 repos for HPLIP
>
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 16:04 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:36:56 Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > I noticed that the current available version on the F11 repos for HPLIP
> > is 3.9.2, but the most current version available from HP is version
> > 3.
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:41:07 +0100
Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
> And other have had nothing but trouble.
> ymmv
I noticed when investigating my problems with printing DVDs
that the newest hplip is a complete transformation from
the old ghostscript based drivers to a direct raster driv
On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:36:56 Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> I noticed that the current available version on the F11 repos for HPLIP
> is 3.9.2, but the most current version available from HP is version
> 3.9.8.
>
> A friend of mine installed this version on his F11 x8
On 08/08/09 16:01, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
--snip--
>
> Amazing what:
>
> yum --enablerepo updates-testing check-update hplip
>
> ...is able to tell you. :)
>
> Is there a BZ existing already so I don't have to create another one?
>
No need, now that y
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 15:41 +0100, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
> On 08/08/09 15:36, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > I noticed that the current available version on the F11 repos for HPLIP
> > is 3.9.2, but the most current version available from HP is version
> > 3.9.8.
On 08/08/09 15:36, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> I noticed that the current available version on the F11 repos for HPLIP
> is 3.9.2, but the most current version available from HP is version
> 3.9.8.
>
> A friend of mine installed this version on his F11 x86_64 system and
> f
I noticed that the current available version on the F11 repos for HPLIP
is 3.9.2, but the most current version available from HP is version
3.9.8.
A friend of mine installed this version on his F11 x86_64 system and
found that it works much MUCH better.
So... When will we see 3.9.8 hit the
, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when checking on the
>>>>>> printer status.
>>>>>>
>>>&g
On 06/23/2009 08:09 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/20/2009 01:50 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 06/20/2009 06:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/20/2009 01:50 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>
>> On 06/20/2009 06:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>
>>>> After installing hplip-gui, I got
On 06/20/2009 01:50 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 06/20/2009 06:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when checking on the
printer status.
audit2allow generated the following policy
module cups20090619 1.0
On 06/20/2009 06:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when checking on the
printer status.
audit2allow generated the following policy
module cups20090619 1.0;
require {
type hwdata_t;
type xdm_t;
class dir
On 06/20/2009 06:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when checking on the
printer status.
audit2allow generated the following policy
module cups20090619 1.0;
require {
type hwdata_t;
type xdm_t;
class dir
On 06/19/2009 07:10 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when checking on the
printer status.
audit2allow generated the following policy
module cups20090619 1.0;
require {
type hwdata_t;
type xdm_t;
class dir search;
class file { read getattr open
After installing hplip-gui, I got selinux errors when checking on the
printer status.
audit2allow generated the following policy
module cups20090619 1.0;
require {
type hwdata_t;
type xdm_t;
class dir search;
class file { read getattr open
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:52 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Yea, I was gonna do that if the problem shows up in the real fedora 11
> release tomorrow (or just add to the existing bug 495672 which does
> look like the same issue). Assuming the release really happens
> tomorrow :-).
OK, yes, that does l
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:38:44 +0100
Tim Waugh wrote:
> However, it would be really useful if you could file a bug against
> Fedora for tracking it, otherwise it will never appear on my radar for
> fixing.
Yea, I was gonna do that if the problem shows up in the real fedora 11
release tomorrow (or j
Tom Horsley wrote:
Just curious: Anyone know if it is possible to downgrade the newest
version of hplip that will be in fedora 11 to the old version
from fedora 10? Looks like the new version has lost the ability
to set the media tray correctly :-(.
https://answers.launchpad.net/hplip/+question
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:29 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Just curious: Anyone know if it is possible to downgrade the newest
> version of hplip that will be in fedora 11 to the old version
> from fedora 10? Looks like the new version has lost the ability
> to set the media tr
Just curious: Anyone know if it is possible to downgrade the newest
version of hplip that will be in fedora 11 to the old version
from fedora 10? Looks like the new version has lost the ability
to set the media tray correctly :-(.
https://answers.launchpad.net/hplip/+question/63943
Just
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:45:13 + (GMT)
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> What do you thing of this problem (fedora 10):
I think you could have found a better subject line than "scratch".
However:
> error: The printer you are trying to setup requires a binary driver
> plug-in and it failed to install.
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:56:49 -0500
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
>> Mostly just wanted to make sure they really work :-).
>>
>
> OK, I'm impressed. I plugged in the USB cable, and both the
> printer and scanner just worked.
>
> I ran system-config-printer, and the printer wa
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:56:49 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Mostly just wanted to make sure they really work :-).
OK, I'm impressed. I plugged in the USB cable, and both the
printer and scanner just worked.
I ran system-config-printer, and the printer was already
defined. The paper sizes all listed,
On Monday 26 January 2009 03:44:24 Anthony Messina wrote:
> On Sunday 25 January 2009 19:21:26 Tom Horsley wrote:
> > Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
> > gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
> > all-in-one products (too bad they didn&#
On Sunday 25 January 2009 19:21:26 Tom Horsley wrote:
> Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
> gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
> all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
> support for their stand alone scanners).
>
> Is anyone
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 18:36 -0800, Richard England wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
> > gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
> > all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
> > support f
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:02:31 +1930
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> I'm using a C5180 all-in-one on my LAN and it works fine. I normally
>> use the GUI for scanning but I just tried scanimage and the scanner
>> lit up and moved, so I guess the
Tom Horsley wrote:
Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
support for their stand alone scanners).
Is anyone actually using one of the HP all-in-one
devices on fedora 10
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:02:31 +1930
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'm using a C5180 all-in-one on my LAN and it works fine. I normally
> use the GUI for scanning but I just tried scanimage and the scanner
> lit up and moved, so I guess the answer is yes. If there's some
> specific option you'd like
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
> gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
> all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
> support for their stand alone scanners).
>
> Is anyone actually using one of the HP all-
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
> gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
> all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
> support for their stand alone scanners).
>
> Is anyone ac
Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have
gotten scanner support added for most of HP's
all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit
support for their stand alone scanners).
Is anyone actually using one of the HP all-in-one
devices on fedora 10 and gotten the scann
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> (1) is a generic tool that dates from before CUPS existed and is
> designed for Fedora, (2) is an attempt to rationalize the various
> spooler systems and is not just for Linux, and (3) is distributed by HP.
> Since you have an HP printer, just u
Andrea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to update hplip to the latest version (2.8.7) to support a new printer.
>
> So I have downloaded the src rpm from fedora 10 and rebuilt the rpm.
> Everything went fine.
> Installed ok (replacing the f9 version 2.8.2)
>
> Now when I lau
Hi,
I need to update hplip to the latest version (2.8.7) to support a new printer.
So I have downloaded the src rpm from fedora 10 and rebuilt the rpm.
Everything went fine.
Installed ok (replacing the f9 version 2.8.2)
Now when I launch system-config-printer I cannot see my the new drivers.
In
50 matches
Mail list logo
