[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #52 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14 13:21:25 EDT --- No problem, thanks for taking care of this :) -- C

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #51 from D Haley 2009-04-14 07:12:19 EDT --- Hi Orcan, Yes, just to clarify, I pushed that in as an update. So

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #50 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-25 22:21:31 EDT --- Yes, but that has nothing to do with what I am sayin

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #49 from D Haley 2009-03-25 21:01:03 EDT --- OK, but could you explain where I am misunderstanding? The bit tha

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #48 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-25 18:57:27 EDT --- For instance, take a look at our libreadline-java pa

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #47 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-25 18:51:43 EDT --- I don't get that implication from those guidelines.

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #46 from D Haley 2009-03-25 18:12:34 EDT --- >Could you please add an unversioned symlink to the versioned jar

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-23 11:59:45 EDT --- flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-23 11:50:13 EDT --- flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-04 11:28:30 EDT --- flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-28 22:23:50 EDT --- flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10 has been submitted as an upda

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-28 22:24:58 EDT --- flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc9 has been submitted as an updat

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #34 from D Haley 2009-02-24 03:35:51 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-11.spec SRPM URL: ht

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #31 from D Haley 2009-02-19 08:52:29 EDT --- Apologies for delay in the response, haven't had a chance to look

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #30 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-15 19:19:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331996) --> (ht

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #29 from D Haley 2009-01-22 06:09:42 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-9.spec SRPM URL: htt

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #28 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-01-20 16:31:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to c

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-01-20 15:53:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) [...] > strip --

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-01-20 15:40:41 EDT --- Some more comments: Requires: libX11 >= 1

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #25 from D Haley 2009-01-20 09:08:07 EDT --- Hopefully this package is near completion. I must be close to winn

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-01-19 17:55:25 EDT --- Some comments before full review: Why do

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-12-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2008-12-19 19:10:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-7.spec SRPM URL: htt

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-12-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Bug 464781 depends on bug 469471, which changed state. Bug 469471 Summary: Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swin

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-12-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-03 12:47:44 EDT --- For the record, it is acceptable for sp

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-12-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #20 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-03 09:56:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-6

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-12-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-01 13:35:19 EDT --- #001: missing ant-commons-logging as B

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-11-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-23 07:33:58 EDT --- #001: Missing BuildRequires: ant-commo

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-11-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-11-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-11-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #16 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-16 07:28:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-4

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-11-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-02 08:38:19 EDT --- mycae, if you modified your spec/srpm, w

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-11-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-01 12:37:25 EDT --- You are supposed to inc

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #13 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-01 02:07:07 EDT --- I have uploaded the new spec & src rpm. Now pen

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-28 18:01:42 EDT --- Looks like you got an a

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #11 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 08:52:08 EDT --- This has been reported as a bug at scilab, as t

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 07:57:57 EDT --- Well, while I cannot find out yet where

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #8 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 06:05:50 EDT --- Looks like this might be dead in the water. Unl

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #9 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 06:06:31 EDT --- Sorry about the dup, forgot the JMF FAQ link: ht

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 05:32:45 EDT --- Well, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pack

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #6 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 04:43:48 EDT --- Hello, Sorry about that, but the spec file I up

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #4 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-13 03:45:26 EDT --- Yes, I am aiming to get a scilab package uploade

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.

2008-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #1 from D Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-30 09:56:46 EDT --- I had to fiddle the %install section to get it t