On 7/27/2025 12:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi Timo
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/26/2025 10:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 7/26/2025 8:2
Hi
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
[...]
> Here's an idea I had to make the transition a bit more rapid:
>
> - Retire git.videolan.org, make it a pure mirror nobody can push to (except
> the mirror script).
+1
> - Make source.ffmpeg.org point to git.ffmpeg.
Hi Timo
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> On 7/26/2025 10:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> > > > On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler w
On 7/26/2025 11:07 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:42, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/26/2025 10:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpiele
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:42, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
> On 7/26/2025 10:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> >>> On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> It's still
On 7/26/2025 9:41 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> Again, many people have literal decades of experience and tooling set up
> to deal with this exact workflow.
https://xkcd.com/1172/
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org
On 7/26/2025 10:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
It's still an extended test. You cannot push to it, since it's just a
mirror.
That's not what
On 7/26/2025 9:29 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> I agree. But like mentioned in the previous message, I don't think
> giving more time changes this in practice. It will likely just move
> the "pain point" to a different date. Because at some point there will
> be "the date".
+1
> Of course this hi
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:23, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
> On 7/26/2025 10:14 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> > n Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 21:29, Timo Rothenpieler
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/26/2025 7:03 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> >>> On 7/22/2025 4:53 AM, Lynne wrote:
> ---
> src/contac
On 7/26/2025 9:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> It's just my personal opinion and it doesn't reflect anyone else in
> the community.
It also broadly reflects my view, FWIW.
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org
On 7/26/2025 9:14 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> It's what the whole vote was about, the vote was not "Let's migrate to
> this", but "Let's put this through a more extended test".
> So I'd say the list was very much informed about that?
I'd say this announcement should be amended to reflect this
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
> On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> > On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> >> It's still an extended test. You cannot push to it, since it's just a
> >> mirror.
> >
> > That's not what written in the announcement,
On 7/26/2025 10:14 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
n Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 21:29, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/26/2025 7:03 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 7/22/2025 4:53 AM, Lynne wrote:
---
src/contact | 11 +++
src/index | 52
n Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 21:29, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
> On 7/26/2025 7:03 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> > On 7/22/2025 4:53 AM, Lynne wrote:
> >> ---
> >> src/contact | 11 +++
> >> src/index | 52
> >> 2 files changed, 63 insert
On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
It's still an extended test. You cannot push to it, since it's just a
mirror.
That's not what written in the announcement, and the fact it is "still
a test" has not been communicated on this list, to
On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> It's still an extended test. You cannot push to it, since it's just a
> mirror.
That's not what written in the announcement, and the fact it is "still
a test" has not been communicated on this list, to my knowledge. It's
all about as clear as mud..
On 7/26/2025 7:03 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 7/22/2025 4:53 AM, Lynne wrote:
---
src/contact | 11 +++
src/index | 52
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
So I am a bit unclear, is development now Forgejo or ML, or both?
Bec
On 7/22/2025 4:53 AM, Lynne wrote:
> ---
> src/contact | 11 +++
> src/index | 52
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
So I am a bit unclear, is development now Forgejo or ML, or both?
Because right now, it seems like both, and that
This linear search has a complexity of O(n). When ffmpeg attempts to
parse a playlist containing approximately 100,000 segments, it
effectively causes a hang for several minutes.
This patch limits the allowed size for duplicate searches to a
reasonable value. Now it takes between 0.5 and a few
Requested to review #20023 ( https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20023
).
---
View it on FFmpeg Forgejo (
https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20023#issuecomment-499 ) or reply
to this email directly.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpe
Hi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 06:05:12PM -1000, compn wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:59:23 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > Hello Kieran
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 10:39:01AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> > wrote:
> > > > About 2. (IMHO)
> > > > * The solution is to hire car
21 matches
Mail list logo
