Re: [FFmpeg-user] Towards better trims & concatenations

2024-01-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 1/6/24 17:20, Jim DeLaHunt wrote: Mark: Hi Jim, On 2024-01-06 11:52, Mark Filipak wrote: Below is what I plan to submit to trac. I welcome comments and corrections. … Good for you, digging into the details and specifics of how FFMpeg performs trims and concatenations. But what I am mi

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Towards better trims & concatenations

2024-01-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 1/6/24 17:20, Jim DeLaHunt wrote: Mark: I'm going to respond twice. Every son is wrong. Let me make that clear: Every son is wrong in some respect. Every son played by MPV shows that MPV is trying to deal with something unexpected. None of the MPV "FPS" report screens (i.e., [shift][I]) g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Towards better trims & concatenations

2024-01-06 Thread Jim DeLaHunt
Mark: On 2024-01-06 11:52, Mark Filipak wrote: Below is what I plan to submit to trac. I welcome comments and corrections. … Good for you, digging into the details and specifics of how FFMpeg performs trims and concatenations. But what I am missing here is a concise problem statement. You

[FFmpeg-user] Towards better trims & concatenations

2024-01-06 Thread Mark Filipak
Below is what I plan to submit to trac. I welcome comments and corrections. What I wrote pretty much goes to the heart of FFmpeg, so I expect push-back. The more people who confirm what I have written, the better. The files are over 500 MB. If you want them, ask. But I recommend you modify the scr